VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christian Albers
dblp:00/10453
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 46% Learning paradigms · 23% Learning theory · 23% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Emerging computing paradigms · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › brain-inspired learning
associative learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Perfect Associative Learning with Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
perceptron |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Perfect Associative Learning with Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › spiking neural network
spike-timing-dependent plasticity |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Perfect Associative Learning with Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
spiking neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Perfect Associative Learning with Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity · NIPS 2013 |
Emerging computing paradigms
neuromorphic computing |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Spike timing-dependent plasticity as dynamic filter · NIPS 2010 |
Emerging computing paradigms › neuromorphic computing › synaptic plasticity
spike-timing-dependent plasticity |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Spike timing-dependent plasticity as dynamic filter · NIPS 2010 |
Emerging computing paradigms › neuromorphic computing
spiking neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Spike timing-dependent plasticity as dynamic filter · NIPS 2010 |
Emerging computing paradigms › neuromorphic computing
synaptic plasticity |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Spike timing-dependent plasticity as dynamic filter · NIPS 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spike-timing-dependent plasticity · 0.2hebbian learning · 0.2anti-hebbian learning · 0.2dynamical systems analysis · 0.1differential equation model · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | WDWorm: A runtime-efficient and user-friendly GUI-based toolbox for experimenting with the nerve net of C. elegansabstractNerve net simulators of C. elegans heavily support research of its nerve net functionality by offering the possibility to conduct digital experiments instead of real ones. However, current software tools are complex and difficult to use for non-programmers. With WDWorm, we offer a user-friendly toolbox with graphical user interface for simulating and experimenting with C. elegans’ nerve net. It does not require an installation and allows for several modifications of the nerve net, including parameter changes of each neuron and connection or the deactivation of individual neurons. Furthermore, a comparison with other software tools highlights that WDWorm is currently the most runtime-efficient approach for simulating and digitally experimenting with C. elegans . To invite other developers and researchers, we provide the source code in an open-access format under a CC-BY 4.0 Creative Commons license. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/dsacri/WDWorm . Sebastian Jenderny, Daniel Sacristán, Philipp Hövel, Christian Albers, Isabella Beyer, Karlheinz Ochs |
Neurocomputing | 4 |
| 2013 | Perfect Associative Learning with Spike-Timing-Dependent PlasticityabstractRecent extensions of the Perceptron, as e.g. the Tempotron, suggest that this theoretical concept is highly relevant also for understanding networks of spiking neurons in the brain. It is not known, however, how the computational power of the Perceptron and of its variants might be accomplished by the plasticity mechanisms of real synapses. Here we prove that spike-timing-dependent plasticity having an anti-Hebbian form for excitatory synapses as well as a spike-timing-dependent plasticity of Hebbian shape for inhibitory synapses are sufficient for realizing the original Perceptron Learning Rule if the respective plasticity mechanisms act in concert with the hyperpolarisation of the post-synaptic neurons. We also show that with these simple yet biologically realistic dynamics Tempotrons are efficiently learned. The proposed mechanism might underly the acquisition of mappings of spatio-temporal activity patterns in one area of the brain onto other spatio-temporal spike patterns in another region and of long term memories in cortex. Our results underline that learning processes in realistic networks of spiking neurons depend crucially on the interactions of synaptic plasticity mechanisms with the dynamics of participating neurons. Christian Albers, Maren Westkott, Klaus Pawelzik |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2010 | Spike timing-dependent plasticity as dynamic filterabstractWhen stimulated with complex action potential sequences synapses exhibit spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) with attenuated and enhanced pre- and postsynaptic contributions to long-term synaptic modifications. In order to investigate the functional consequences of these contribution dynamics (CD) we propose a minimal model formulated in terms of differential equations. We find that our model reproduces a wide range of experimental results with a small number of biophysically interpretable parameters. The model allows to investigate the susceptibility of STDP to arbitrary time courses of pre- and postsynaptic activities, i.e. its nonlinear filter properties. We demonstrate this for the simple example of small periodic modulations of pre- and postsynaptic firing rates for which our model can be solved. It predicts synaptic strengthening for synchronous rate modulations. For low baseline rates modifications are dominant in the theta frequency range, a result which underlines the well known relevance of theta activities in hippocampus and cortex for learning. We also find emphasis of low baseline spike rates and suppression for high baseline rates. The latter suggests a mechanism of network activity regulation inherent in STDP. Furthermore, our novel formulation provides a general framework for investigating the joint dynamics of neuronal activity and the CD of STDP in both spike-based as well as rate-based neuronal network models. Joscha Tapani Schmiedt, Christian Albers, Klaus Pawelzik |
NIPS | 2 |