Massive datasets related to infectious diseases became available after the COVID-19 pandemic, supporting data-driven approaches in modeling and forecasting infectious diseases. However, these approaches are known to exacerbate data biases present in the training data such as having certain demographic groups being over or underrepresented in the data. Such data collection biases may propagate through the modeling and prediction pipelines to decision-making, and the consequences are relatively unknown. Therefore, efforts are needed to understand how data collection bias affects data-driven infectious disease models. This datasets and benchmarks paper provides a suite of datasets, each corresponding to a simulated disease spread among a population of 5000 simulated agents over 90 days in Atlanta and San Francisco. For each dataset, we provide not only the full (simulated ground truth) of the disease spread in terms of when, where, and by whom the disease spreads, but also information on which cases are observed when different types and degrees of data collection bias are applied. The agents' characteristics, check-ins, and social network data are also available to support downstream tasks. Additionally, we also describe how to use the simulation to re-generate the data and to generate new datasets in different regions and with different parameters. With the provided datasets and the simulation tools, researchers studying the spread of infectious diseases may better understand, account for, and correct the systematic bias caused by the inherent real-world data bias, and hence improve the prediction of infectious diseases.

Point-of-interest (POI) recommendation considers spatio-temporal factors like distance, peak hours, and user check-ins. Given their influence on both consumer experience and POI business, it’s crucial to consider fairness from multiple perspectives. Unfortunately, these systems often provide less accurate recommendations to inactive users and less exposure to unpopular POIs. This paper develops a post-filter method that includes provider and consumer fairness in existing models, aiming to balance fairness metrics like item exposure with performance metrics such as precision and distance. Experiments show that a linear scoring model for provider fairness in re-scoring items offers the best balance between performance and long-tail exposure, sometimes without much precision loss. Addressing consumer fairness by recommending more popular POIs to inactive users increased precision in some models and datasets. However, combinations that reached the Pareto front of consumer and provider fairness resulted in the lowest precision values, highlighting that tradeoffs depend greatly on the model and dataset.

App usage prediction is important for smartphone system optimization to enhance user experience. Existing modeling approaches utilize historical app usage logs along with a wide range of semantic information to predict the app usage; however, they are only effective in certain scenarios and cannot be generalized across different situations. This paper address this problem by developing a model called Contextual and Semantic Embedding model for App Usage Prediction (CoSEM) for app usage prediction that leverages integration of 1) semantic information embedding and 2) contextual information embedding based on historical app usage of individuals. Extensive experiments show that the combination of semantic information and history app usage information enables our model to outperform the baselines on three real-world datasets, achieving an MRR score over 0.55,0.57,0.86 and Hit rate scores of more than 0.71, 0.75, and 0.95, respectively.