Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Stein 0002

dblp:00/2843-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0003-4127-6353ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.812024
LiGNN: Graph Neural Networks at LinkedIn · KDD 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning
0.812024
LiGNN: Graph Neural Networks at LinkedIn · KDD 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › scalable graph neural network
scalable graph neural network training
0.812024
LiGNN: Graph Neural Networks at LinkedIn · KDD 2024
Information retrieval
candidate selection
0.212016
CaSMoS: A Framework for Learning Candidate Selection Models over Structured Queries and Documents · KDD 2016
Information retrieval
query processing
0.212016
CaSMoS: A Framework for Learning Candidate Selection Models over Structured Queries and Documents · KDD 2016
Information retrieval › query processing
structured query processing
0.212016
CaSMoS: A Framework for Learning Candidate Selection Models over Structured Queries and Documents · KDD 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temporal graph architecture · 0.8neighbor sampling · 0.8cold start via graph densification · 0.8weighted AND query · 0.2constrained feature selection · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 LiGNN: Graph Neural Networks at LinkedIn
abstract
In this paper, we present LiGNN, a deployed large-scale Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) Framework. We share our insight on developing and deployment of GNNs at large scale at LinkedIn. We present a set of algorithmic improvements to the quality of GNN representation learning including temporal graph architectures with long term losses, effective cold start solutions via graph densification, ID embeddings and multi-hop neighbor sampling. We explain how we built and sped up by 7x our large-scale training on LinkedIn graphs with adaptive sampling of neighbors, grouping and slicing of training data batches, specialized shared-memory queue and local gradient optimization. We summarize our deployment lessons and learnings gathered from A/B test experiments. The techniques presented in this work have contributed to an approximate relative improvements of 1% of Job application hearing back rate, 2% Ads CTR lift, 0.5% of Feed engaged daily active users, 0.2% session lift and 0.1% weekly active user lift from people recommendation. We believe that this work can provide practical solutions and insights for engineers who are interested in applying Graph neural networks at large scale.
Fedor Borisyuk, Shihai He, Yunbo Ouyang, Morteza Ramezani, Peng Du 0004, Xiaochen Hou, Chengming Jiang 0001, Nitin Pasumarthy, Priya Bannur, Birjodh Singh Tiwana, Ping Liu 0002, Siddharth Dangi, Daqi Sun, Zhoutao Pei, Sirou Zhu, Qianqi Shen, Kuang-Hsuan Lee, David Stein 0002, Baolei Li, Haichao Wei, Amol Ghoting
KDD19
2016 CaSMoS: A Framework for Learning Candidate Selection Models over Structured Queries and Documents
abstract
User experience at social media and web platforms such as LinkedIn is heavily dependent on the performance and scalability of its products. Applications such as personalized search and recommendations require real-time scoring of millions of structured candidate documents associated with each query, with strict latency constraints. In such applications, the query incorporates the context of the user (in addition to search keywords if present), and hence can become very large, comprising of thousands of Boolean clauses over hundreds of document attributes. Consequently, candidate selection techniques need to be applied since it is infeasible to retrieve and score all matching documents from the underlying inverted index. We propose CaSMoS, a machine learned candidate selection framework that makes use of Weighted AND (WAND) query. Our framework is designed to prune irrelevant documents and retrieve documents that are likely to be part of the top-k results for the query. We apply a constrained feature selection algorithm to learn positive weights for feature combinations that are used as part of the weighted candidate selection query. We have implemented and deployed this system to be executed in real time using LinkedIn's Galene search platform. We perform extensive evaluation with different training data approaches and parameter settings, and investigate the scalability of the proposed candidate selection model. Our deployment of this system as part of LinkedIn's job recommendation engine has resulted in significant reduction in latency (up to 25%) without sacrificing the quality of the retrieved results, thereby paving the way for more sophisticated scoring models.
Fedor Borisyuk, Krishnaram Kenthapadi, David Stein 0002, Bo Zhao 0001
KDD3