Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kian-Wei Kor

dblp:00/3105 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › open-ended question answering
definitional question answering
0.112007
Interesting nuggets and their impact on definitional question answering · SIGIR 2007
Information retrieval › document retrieval › passage retrieval
sentence retrieval
0.012007
Interesting nuggets and their impact on definitional question answering · SIGIR 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linguistic patterns · 0.1human interest model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Interesting nuggets and their impact on definitional question answering
abstract
Current approaches to identifying definitional sentences in the context of Question Answering mainly involve the use of linguistic or syntactic patterns to identify informative nuggets. This is insufficient as they do not address the novelty factor that a definitional nugget must also possess. This paper proposes to address the deficiency by building a "Human Interest Model" from external knowledge. It is hoped that such a model will allow the computation of human interest in the sentence with respect to the topic. We compare and contrast our model with current definitional question answering models to show that interestingness plays an important factor in definitional question answering.
Kian-Wei Kor, Tat-Seng Chua
SIGIR1