Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arnold Meijster
dblp:00/5773
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Image and video processing · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Parallel and multicore computing · 92% Memory systems · 8% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing
mathematical morphology |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Hybrid Shared-Memory Parallel Max-Tree Algorithm for Extreme Dynamic-Range Images · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2018 |
Image and video processing › mathematical morphology
morphological filtering |
0.1 | 2 | 2008 | Concurrent Computation of Attribute Filters on Shared Memory Parallel Machines · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008 A Comparison of Algorithms for Connected Set Openings and Closings · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | A Hybrid Shared-Memory Parallel Max-Tree Algorithm for Extreme Dynamic-Range Images · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2018 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms
shared-memory parallel algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | A Hybrid Shared-Memory Parallel Max-Tree Algorithm for Extreme Dynamic-Range Images · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2018 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms
parallel image processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Concurrent Computation of Attribute Filters on Shared Memory Parallel Machines · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008 |
Image and video processing › mathematical morphology
connected operators |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | A Comparison of Algorithms for Connected Set Openings and Closings · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002 |
Image and video processing › mathematical morphology
pattern spectrum |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | A Comparison of Algorithms for Connected Set Openings and Closings · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002 |
Memory systems › cache
cache behavior |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Concurrent Computation of Attribute Filters on Shared Memory Parallel Machines · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
merging algorithm · 0.7flooding algorithm · 0.7shared-memory parallelism · 0.2min-tree · 0.2max-tree · 0.2union-find · 0.0priority queue · 0.0hierarchical queue · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | A Hybrid Shared-Memory Parallel Max-Tree Algorithm for Extreme Dynamic-Range ImagesabstractMax-trees, or component trees, are graph structures that represent the connected components of an image in a hierarchical way. Nowadays, many application fields rely on images with high-dynamic range or floating point values. Efficient sequential algorithms exist to build trees and compute attributes for images of any bit depth. However, we show that the current parallel algorithms perform poorly already with integers at bit depths higher than 16 bits per pixel. We propose a parallel method combining the two worlds of flooding and merging max-tree algorithms. First, a pilot max-tree of a quantized version of the image is built in parallel using a flooding method. Later, this structure is used in a parallel leaf-to-root approach to compute efficiently the final max-tree and to drive the merging of the sub-trees computed by the threads. We present an analysis of the performance both on simulated and actual 2D images and 3D volumes. Execution times are about better than the fastest sequential algorithm and speed-up goes up to on 64 threads. Ugo Moschini, Arnold Meijster, Michael H. F. Wilkinson |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2008 | Concurrent Computation of Attribute Filters on Shared Memory Parallel MachinesabstractMorphological attribute filters have not previously been parallelized, mainly because they are both global and non-separable. We propose a parallel algorithm that achieves efficient parallelism for a large class of attribute filters, including attribute openings, closings, thinnings and thickenings, based on Salembier's Max-Trees and Min-trees. The image or volume is first partitioned in multiple slices. We then compute the Max-trees of each slice using any sequential Max-Tree algorithm. Subsequently, the Max-trees of the slices can be merged to obtain the Max-tree of the image. A C-implementation yielded good speed-ups on both a 16-processor MIPS 14000 parallel machine, and a dual-core Opteron-based machine. It is shown that the speed-up of the parallel algorithm is a direct measure of the gain with respect to the sequential algorithm used. Furthermore, the concurrent algorithm shows a speed gain of up to 72 percent on a single-core processor, due to reduced cache thrashing. Michael H. F. Wilkinson, Wim H. Hesselink, Jan-Eppo Jonker, Arnold Meijster |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 5 |
| 2002 | A Comparison of Algorithms for Connected Set Openings and ClosingsabstractThe implementation of morphological connected set operators for image filtering and pattern recognition is discussed. Two earlier algorithms based on priority queues and hierarchical queues, respectively, are compared to a more recent union-find approach. Unlike the earlier algorithms which process regional extrema in the image sequentially, the union-find method allows simultaneous processing of extrema. In the context of area openings, closings, and pattern spectra, the union-find algorithm outperforms the previous methods on almost all natural and synthetic images tested. Finally, extensions to pattern spectra and the more general class of attribute operators are presented for all three algorithms, and memory usages are compared. Arnold Meijster, Michael H. F. Wilkinson |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2001 | Fast computation of morphological area pattern spectraabstractAn area based counterpart of the binary structural opening spectra is developed. It is shown that these area opening and closing spectra can be computed using an adaptation of Tarjan's (1975) union-find algorithm. These spectra provide rotation, translation, and scale invariant pattern vectors for texture analysis. Arnold Meijster, Michael H. F. Wilkinson |
ICIP (3) | 1 |
| 2001 | Concurrent determination of connected components
Wim H. Hesselink, Arnold Meijster, Coenraad Bron |
Sci. Comput. Program. | 2 |
| 2000 | The Watershed Transform: Definitions, Algorithms and Parallelization StrategiesabstractThe watershed transform is the method of choice for image segmentation in the field of mathematical morphology. We present a critical review of several definitions of the watershed transform and the associated sequential algorithms, and discuss vario Jos B. T. M. Roerdink, Arnold Meijster |
Fundam. Informaticae | 2 |
| 1995 | A Proposal for the Implementation of a Parallel Watershed Algorithm
Arnold Meijster, Jos B. T. M. Roerdink |
CAIP | 1 |