Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Souvik Maiti

dblp:00/7003 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular property prediction
melting temperature prediction
0.112005
Oligonucleotide properties determination and primer designing: a critical examination of predictions · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › synthetic biology
oligonucleotide design
0.112005
Oligonucleotide properties determination and primer designing: a critical examination of predictions · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
primer design
0.012005
Oligonucleotide properties determination and primer designing: a critical examination of predictions · Bioinform. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nearest neighbor · 0.1comparative analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Oligonucleotide properties determination and primer designing: a critical examination of predictions
abstract
MOTIVATION: Precise prediction of melting temperature (T(m)), secondary structures and design of oligonucleotides determine the efficiency and success of experimentation in molecular biology. Availability of a plethora of software and the users unawareness about their limitations compromises the accuracy and reliability of the predictions. RESULTS: Comparative analysis of 56 modules was done for T(m) prediction using a large set of oligonucleotide sequences spanning the whole range of GC-content and length. Allawi module of the calculator 'MELTING', Nearest Neighbor (NN) of oligo calculator (McLab), NN of T(m) Calculation for Oligos (Biomath Calculator, Promega) and HYTHER provided the most precise T(m) predictions. A model has also been proposed to calculate the optimum annealing temperature integrating the already reported formulations. Secondary structure predictions of oligonucleotides reveal a large number of structures in contrast to the experimental observations. Of the 11 primer designing tools evaluated, Primer 3 and WebPrimer performed the best for the AT-rich templates, Exon Primer for AT = GC templates, and Primer Design Assistant, Primer3 and Primer Quest for GC-rich templates. This study provides optimal choice for application to the user, increasing the success of a variety of experimentations, especially those that have high-throughput and complex assay designs. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The details of the oligonucleotides and of the different modules of T(m) prediction considered for the study are provided as Supplementary Information, available at Bioinformatics online.
Sreenivas Chavali, Anubha Mahajan, Rubina Tabassum, Souvik Maiti, Dwaipayan Bharadwaj
Bioinform.4