Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Takeshige Miyoshi

dblp:00/88 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 4 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 77% Requirements engineering and software design · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › specification
specification methods
0.011993
An Empirical Study of Evaluating Software Development Environment Quality · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

software quality evaluation process model · 0.0ISO/IEC 9126 quality model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 The Need for Obtaining Real Sponsor Satisfaction that Leads to Steady Generation of SPI Effects
Takeshige Miyoshi
SPICE1
2015 Emphasis on Personal Attributes/Skills to Produce 'Quality' Assessment Outputs that Lead to Steady Generation of SPI Effects
Takeshige Miyoshi
SPICE1
1993 An Empirical Study of Evaluating Software Development Environment Quality
abstract
A study that evaluates new-paradigm-oriented software development environments which have been developed in the five-year formal approach to software environment technology (FASET) project is reviewed. For this study, a software environment evaluation technology based on a software quality evaluation process model defined in ISO/IEC 9126 has been developed. The evaluation technology has been applied to the R&D project at the middle and final phase of development. The evaluation results provide useful information to develop a widely acceptable evaluation technology and to improve the new-paradigm-oriented software development environments that are based on various specification methods: the algebraic specification method, function-oriented specification method, declarative specification method, natural-language-oriented specification method, diagrammatic specification method, state-transition-oriented specification method, and model-based specification method.>
Takeshige Miyoshi, Motoei Azuma
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1
1989 Evaluating software development environment quality
abstract
An evaluation technology for software development environments based on a software quality evaluation process model was developed. This evaluation technology was applied to a software development environments project, FASET (formal approach to software environment technology), to evaluate prototype environments. The quality evaluation process model and its concept are presented, the technology for evaluating a software development environment is described, and the experimental process and results of the FASET project are shown.>
Takeshige Miyoshi, Yasuko Togashi, Motoei Azuma
COMPSAC1