Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luc Moulinier

dblp:01/3173 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction › template-based modeling
homology modeling
0.112006
MAGOS: multiple alignment and modelling server · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology
multiple sequence alignment
0.112006
MAGOS: multiple alignment and modelling server · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure
0.112006
MAGOS: multiple alignment and modelling server · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.012008
RReportGenerator: automatic reports from routine statistical analysis using R · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data preprocessing
microarray quality control
0.012008
RReportGenerator: automatic reports from routine statistical analysis using R · Bioinform. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

r · 0.1bioconductor · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Spliceator: multi-species splice site prediction using convolutional neural networks
abstract
BACKGROUND: Ab initio prediction of splice sites is an essential step in eukaryotic genome annotation. Recent predictors have exploited Deep Learning algorithms and reliable gene structures from model organisms. However, Deep Learning methods for non-model organisms are lacking. RESULTS: We developed Spliceator to predict splice sites in a wide range of species, including model and non-model organisms. Spliceator uses a convolutional neural network and is trained on carefully validated data from over 100 organisms. We show that Spliceator achieves consistently high accuracy (89-92%) compared to existing methods on independent benchmarks from human, fish, fly, worm, plant and protist organisms. CONCLUSIONS: Spliceator is a new Deep Learning method trained on high-quality data, which can be used to predict splice sites in diverse organisms, ranging from human to protists, with consistently high accuracy.
Nicolas Scalzitti, Arnaud Kress, Romain Orhand, Luc Moulinier, Anne Jeannin-Girardon, Pierre Collet, Olivier Poch, Julie Dawn Thompson
BMC Bioinform.5
2008 RReportGenerator: automatic reports from routine statistical analysis using R
abstract
UNLABELLED: With the establishment of high-throughput (HT) screening methods there is an increasing need for automatic analysis methods. Here we present RReportGenerator, a user-friendly portal for automatic routine analysis using the statistical platform R and Bioconductor. RReportGenerator is designed to analyze data using predefined analysis scenarios via a graphical user interface (GUI). A report in pdf format combining text, figures and tables is automatically generated and results may be exported. To demonstrate suitable analysis tasks we provide direct web access to a collection of analysis scenarios for summarizing data from transfected cell arrays (TCA), segmentation of CGH data, and microarray quality control and normalization. AVAILABILITY: RReportGenerator, a user manual and a collection of analysis scenarios are available under a GNU public license on http://www-bio3d-igbmc.u-strasbg.fr/~wraff
Wolfgang Raffelsberger, Yannick Krause, Luc Moulinier, David Kieffer, Anne-Laure Morand, Laurent Brino, Olivier Poch
Bioinform.3
2007 Blast sampling for structural and functional analyses
abstract
BACKGROUND: The post-genomic era is characterised by a torrent of biological information flooding the public databases. As a direct consequence, similarity searches starting with a single query sequence frequently lead to the identification of hundreds, or even thousands of potential homologues. The huge volume of data renders the subsequent structural, functional and evolutionary analyses very difficult. It is therefore essential to develop new strategies for efficient sampling of this large sequence space, in order to reduce the number of sequences to be processed. At the same time, it is important to retain the most pertinent sequences for structural and functional studies. RESULTS: An exhaustive analysis on a large scale test set (284 protein families) was performed to compare the efficiency of four different sampling methods aimed at selecting the most pertinent sequences. These four methods sample the proteins detected by BlastP searches and can be divided into two categories: two customisable methods where the user defines either the maximal number or the percentage of sequences to be selected; two automatic methods in which the number of sequences selected is determined by the program. We focused our analysis on the potential information content of the sampled sets of sequences using multiple alignment of complete sequences as the main validation tool. The study considered two criteria: the total number of sequences in BlastP and their associated E-values. The subsequent analyses investigated the influence of the sampling methods on the E-value distributions, the sequence coverage, the final multiple alignment quality and the active site characterisation at various residue conservation thresholds as a function of these criteria. CONCLUSION: The comparative analysis of the four sampling methods allows us to propose a suitable sampling strategy that significantly reduces the number of homologous sequences required for alignment, while at the same time maintaining the relevant information concerning the active site residues.
Anne Friedrich, Raymond Ripp, Nicolas B. Garnier, Emmanuel Bettler, Gilbert Deléage, Olivier Poch, Luc Moulinier
BMC Bioinform.7
2006 MAGOS: multiple alignment and modelling server
abstract
Abstract Summary: MAGOS is a web server allowing automated protein modelling coupled to the creation of a hierarchical and annotated multiple alignment of complete sequences. MAGOS is designed for an interactive approach of structural information within the framework of the evolutionary relevance of mined and predicted sequence information. Availability: The web server is freely available at Supplementary information: The website supplies detailed explanations and illustrations of processes and results at Contact: [email protected]
Nicolas B. Garnier, Anne Friedrich, Raphael Bolze, Emmanuel Bettler, Luc Moulinier, Christophe Geourjon, Julie Dawn Thompson, Gilbert Deléage, Olivier Poch
Bioinform.5