Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kanela Kaligosi
dblp:01/3245
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 50% Computational complexity · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity
query complexity |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Towards Optimal Multiple Selection · ICALP 2005 |
Algorithms and data structures › selection
selection algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Towards Optimal Multiple Selection · ICALP 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lower bound · 0.1comparison model · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Cycle bases of graphs and sampled manifolds
Craig Gotsman, Kanela Kaligosi, Kurt Mehlhorn, Dimitrios Michail 0001, Evangelia Pyrga |
Comput. Aided Geom. Des. | 2 |
| 2006 | Faster Algorithms for Computing Longest Common Increasing SubsequencesabstractWe present algorithms for finding a longest common increasing subsequence of two or more input sequences. For two sequences of lengths m and n, where m≥n, we present an algorithm with an output-dependent expected running time of $O((m+n\ell) \log\log \sigma + {\ensuremath{\mathit{Sort}}})$ and O(m) space, where ℓ is the length of an LCIS, σ is the size of the alphabet, and ${\ensuremath{\mathit{Sort}}}$ is the time to sort each input sequence. For k≥3 length-n sequences we present an algorithm which improves the previous best bound by more than a factor k for many inputs. In both cases, our algorithms are conceptually quite simple but rely on existing sophisticated data structures. Finally, we introduce the problem of longest common weakly-increasing (or non-decreasing) subsequences (LCWIS), for which we present an O(m+nlogn)-time algorithm for the 3-letter alphabet case. For the extensively studied longest common subsequence problem, comparable speedups have not been achieved for small alphabets. Gerth Stølting Brodal, Kanela Kaligosi, Irit Katriel, Martin Kutz |
CPM | 2 |
| 2006 | How Branch Mispredictions Affect Quicksort
Kanela Kaligosi, Peter Sanders 0001 |
ESA | 1 |
| 2005 | Towards Optimal Multiple Selection
Kanela Kaligosi, Kurt Mehlhorn, J. Ian Munro, Peter Sanders 0001 |
ICALP | 1 |