Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Antony Bryant

dblp:01/3344 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
0000-0002-2748-7395ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
software engineering practice
0.012000
It's engineering Jim ... but not as we know it: software engineering - solution to the software crisis, or part of the problem? · ICSE 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

conceptual analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 The future of information systems - Thinking Informatically
abstract
Many of those who are active within the academic field of information systems (IS) are constantly seeking a firm disciplinary basis for their endeavours. In many respects, such efforts are based upon a mistaken view of how disciplines are actually constituted, and the purposes that they serve. In many respects, it would be far more fruitful if those working within the field of IS were to accept a more fluid and contingent notion of a discipline; simultaneously recognizing the contested nature of many of the core concepts – particularly information, communication and technology. In so doing, we will be Thinking Informatically.
Antony Bryant
Eur. J. Inf. Syst.1
2000 Chinese Encyclopaedias and Balinese Cockfights - Lessons for Business Process Change and Knowledge Management
Antony Bryant
EKAW1
2000 It's engineering Jim ... but not as we know it: software engineering - solution to the software crisis, or part of the problem?
abstract
This paper considers the impact and role of the 'engineering' metaphor, and argues that it is time to reconsider its impact on software development practice.
Antony Bryant
ICSE1