Kerry Bernstein

dblp:01/3440 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 6 · 4 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
5 papers
Emerging computing paradigms · 21% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 18% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 17%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
optical interconnection networks
0.112010
Device and Architecture Outlook for Beyond CMOS Switches · Proc. IEEE 2010
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture
0.112010
Device and Architecture Outlook for Beyond CMOS Switches · Proc. IEEE 2010
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › chip multiprocessor
3d chip multiprocessor
0.112009
Mitigating Memory Wall Effects in High-Clock-Rate and Multicore CMOS 3-D Processor Memory Stacks · Proc. IEEE 2009
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
chip multiprocessor
0.112009
Mitigating Memory Wall Effects in High-Clock-Rate and Multicore CMOS 3-D Processor Memory Stacks · Proc. IEEE 2009
Memory systems
memory wall
0.112009
Mitigating Memory Wall Effects in High-Clock-Rate and Multicore CMOS 3-D Processor Memory Stacks · Proc. IEEE 2009
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › die-to-die interconnect
3d interconnect
0.112007
Interconnects in the Third Dimension: Design Challenges for 3D ICs · DAC 2007
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.112007
Interconnects in the Third Dimension: Design Challenges for 3D ICs · DAC 2007
Integrated circuit design › 3d integration
through-silicon via
0.112007
Interconnects in the Third Dimension: Design Challenges for 3D ICs · DAC 2007
Integrated circuit design
technology scaling
0.012003
Microarchitecture on the MOSFET Diet · MICRO 2003
Memory systems › memory hierarchy
cache hierarchy
0.012009
Mitigating Memory Wall Effects in High-Clock-Rate and Multicore CMOS 3-D Processor Memory Stacks · Proc. IEEE 2009
Integrated circuit design
3d integration
0.012007
Interconnects in the Third Dimension: Design Challenges for 3D ICs · DAC 2007
Energy-efficient computing
leakage power reduction
0.012003
Reshaping EDA for power · DAC 2003
Integrated circuit design
low-power circuit design
0.012003
Reshaping EDA for power · DAC 2003
Energy-efficient computing
voltage scaling
0.012003
Reshaping EDA for power · DAC 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

architectural simulation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Device and Architecture Outlook for Beyond CMOS Switches
abstract
Sooner or later, fundamental limitations destine complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) scaling to a conclusion. A number of unique switches have been proposed as replacements, many of which do not even use electron charge as the state variable. Instead, these nanoscale structures pass tokens in the spin, excitonic, photonic, magnetic, quantum, or even heat domains. Emergent physical behaviors and idiosyncrasies of these novel switches can complement the execution of specific algorithms or workloads by enabling quite unique architectures. Ultimately, exploiting these unusual responses will extend throughput in high-performance computing. Alternative tokens also require new transport mechanisms to replace the conventional chip wire interconnect schemes of charge-based computing. New intrinsic limits to scaling in post-CMOS technologies are likely to be bounded ultimately by thermodynamic entropy and Shannon noise.
Kerry Bernstein, Ralph K. Cavin III, Wolfgang Porod, Alan C. Seabaugh, Jeff Welser
Proc. IEEE1
2009 Mitigating Memory Wall Effects in High-Clock-Rate and Multicore CMOS 3-D Processor Memory Stacks
abstract
Three-dimensional chip (3-D) stacking technology provides a new approach to address the so-called memory wall problem. Memory processor chip stacking reduces this memory wall problem, permitting faster clock rates (with suitable processor logic) or permitting multicore access to shared memory using a large number of vertical vias between tiers in the stack, for ultrawide bit path transfer of data and address information to and from various levels of cache. Although a limited amount of parallel access is possible using conventional two-dimensional (2-D) chip memory-processor approaches, 3-D memory-processor stacking greatly extends this to much larger capacity memories. We evaluate high-clock-rate processors as well as shared memory processors with a large number of cores. Various architectural design options to reduce the impact of the memory wall on the processor performance are explored and validated through simulations. Certain architectural features can be implemented in a 3-D chip, such as an ultrawide, ultrashort vertical bus with low parasitic resistance and the elimination of conventional electrostatic discharge, and packaging parasitics required in multiple package 2-D solutions. The objective is to reduce the clocks per instruction figure of merit for high clock speeds in order to deliver significant performance levels. High-clock-rate processors can be designed with SiGe heterostructure bipolar transistors to obtain processors operating on the order of 16 or 32 GHz.
Philip Jacob 0001, Aamir Zia, Okan Erdogan, Paul M. Belemjian, Jin Woo Kim, Michael Chu, Russell P. Kraft, John F. McDonald 0001, Kerry Bernstein
Proc. IEEE9
2007 Interconnects in the Third Dimension: Design Challenges for 3D ICs
abstract
Despite generation upon generation of scaling, computer chips have until now remained essentially 2-dimensional. Improvements in on-chip wire delay and in the maximum number of I/O per chip have not been able to keep up with transistor performance growth; it has become steadily harder to hide the discrepancy. 3D chip technologies come in a number of flavors, but are expected to enable the extension of CMOS performance. Designing in three dimensions, however, forces the industry to look at formerly-two- dimensional integration issues quite differently, and requires the re-fitting of multiple existing EDA capabilities.
Kerry Bernstein, Paul S. Andry, Jerome Cann, Philip G. Emma, David Greenberg, Wilfried Haensch, Mike Ignatowski, Steven J. Koester, John Magerlein, Ruchir Puri, Albert M. Young
DAC1
2006 Design space exploration for 3D architectures
abstract
As technology scales, interconnects have become a major performance bottleneck and a major source of power consumption for microprocessors. Increasing interconnect costs make it necessary to consider alternate ways of building modern microprocessors. One promising option is 3D architectures where a stack of multiple device layers with direct vertical tunneling through them are put together on the same chip. As fabrication of 3D integrated circuits has become viable, developing CAD tools and architectural techniques is imperative to explore the design space to 3D microarchitectures. In this article, we give a brief introduction to 3D integration technology, discuss the EDA design tools that can enable the adoption of 3D ICs, and present the implementation of various microprocessor components using 3D technology. An industrial case study is presented as an initial attempt to design 3D microarchitectures.
Yuan Xie 0001, Gabriel H. Loh, Bryan Black, Kerry Bernstein
ACM J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst.4
2003 Reshaping EDA for power
abstract
Today's rising power densities have been widely cited as the foremost challenge to continued CMOS scaling. In fact, the current power crisis is reminiscent of the final days previous technologies, such as the once popular bipolar and NMOS technologies and even vacuum tubes. How CMOS technology will respond to the current power challenge to extend CMOS scaling to sub-90nm technology is an important question for designer and CAD tool developers alike. With aggressive scaling a number of new challenges have arisen, such as leakage control, heat removal and power supply distribution, that need to be addressed using new design techniques in conjunction with new CAD solutions.This panel brings together experts in circuit design and CAD tool development to discuss the current status of low-power design and provide opinions on what new EDA capabilities are most important in the power-constrained design era. For instance, how will power be distributed in a robust fashion in sub-90nm ICs, and what are the critical EDA analysis and optimization capabilities? What are the best techniques for leakage reduction, not only in standby modes, but also in the active mode? And how far will voltage scaling take us in attacking the dynamic power consumption issue? What will a power-centric design flow look like and how will it change the way we design ICs? The objective of the panel is to explore these issues and formulate a list of critical issues that need to be addressed by the EDA community to enable successful scaling of CMOS into the sub-90nm era.
Jan M. Rabaey, Dennis Sylvester, David T. Blaauw, Kerry Bernstein, Jerry Frenkil, Mark Horowitz, Wolfgang Nebel, Takayasu Sakurai
DAC4
2003 Design and CAD Challenges in sub-90nm CMOS Technologies
Kerry Bernstein, Ching-Te Chuang, Rajiv V. Joshi, Ruchir Puri
ICCAD1
2003 Microarchitecture on the MOSFET Diet
abstract
Microarchitecture and technology scaling have historically shared responsibility for the microprocessor's phenomenal generation-over-generation performance improvement. The era marked by unrestrained proliferation of successively scaled, leakier devices to achieve incremental architectural transaction rate growth is coming to a close, however. Increased pipeline depth has caused non-linear latch density expansion; shorter FO4-equivalent cycles have made control logic substantially more complex. The resulting energy per operation, scaled-process-induced delay variation, logic corruption due to soft errors, and erosion in die area access latency has become real-world constraints. This talk explores how features of past technologies have influenced high speed microarchitectures, and how the characteristics of proposed new devices and interconnects for lithographies beyond 90 nm may shape future machine design. Given our industry's power-restricted ability to continue scaling, and the approach of fundamental, quantum-mechanical precision boundaries, the role of microarchitecture in extending CMOS performance is more important than ever.
Kerry Bernstein
MICRO1
1996 Practical performance/power alternatives within an existing CMOS technology generation
abstract
The tremendous demand for advanced microprocessors is making developers offer a superior product at a competitive price which meets specific performance, power, and reliability requirements. Today's products are designed and built with essentially the same design, fabrication, and test tools used by all industry manufacturers and are constrained by the same device physics, package impedance, heat dissipation capability, and battery energy density limitations. In addition, the current technology generation presents a new set of difficult challenges for the treatment of power dissipation. Lowering voltage to reduce power diminishes FET overdrive and the performance of the device. Recapturing performance by migrating quickly to the next scaled technology generation, however, makes low-power designs expensive, and is not always necessary. Standard full scaling preserves physical and electrical relationships between parameters. On the other hand, selective scaling of specific device parameters may allow the exploitation of existing tools and designs by the use of a different design point on the process "surface". This paper describes recent attempts to explore the feasibility of selective scaling and anticipated constraints associated with future technology generations.
Kerry Bernstein, John E. Bertsch, William F. Clark, John J. Ellis-Monaghan, Lawrence G. Heller, Edward J. Nowak
ISLPED1