Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Earl Hubbell

dblp:01/4660 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-7301-3759ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
5 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
gene fusion detection
0.412019
Alignment-free filtering for cfNA fusion fragments · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.132005
Analysis of high density expression microarrays with signed-rank call algorithms · Bioinform. 2002
Robust estimators for expression analysis · Bioinform. 2002
Dynamic model based algorithms for screening and genotyping over 100K SNPs on oligonucleotide microarrays · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.112005
Dynamic model based algorithms for screening and genotyping over 100K SNPs on oligonucleotide microarrays · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genotyping
0.112005
Dynamic model based algorithms for screening and genotyping over 100K SNPs on oligonucleotide microarrays · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.022002
Robust estimators for expression analysis · Bioinform. 2002
Analysis of high density expression microarrays with signed-rank call algorithms · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data preprocessing
microarray quality assessment
0.011999
Fidelity Probes for DNA Arrays · ISMB 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

max-cover filtering · 0.4alignment-free k-mer matching · 0.4maximum likelihood estimation · 0.1dynamic model-based algorithm · 0.1wilcoxon signed-rank test · 0.0robust estimation · 0.0normalization · 0.0hierarchical modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Alignment-free filtering for cfNA fusion fragments
abstract
MOTIVATION: Cell-free nucleic acid (cfNA) sequencing data require improvements to existing fusion detection methods along multiple axes: high depth of sequencing, low allele fractions, short fragment lengths and specialized barcodes, such as unique molecular identifiers. RESULTS: AF4 was developed to address these challenges. It uses a novel alignment-free kmer-based method to detect candidate fusion fragments with high sensitivity and orders of magnitude faster than existing tools. Candidate fragments are then filtered using a max-cover criterion that significantly reduces spurious matches while retaining authentic fusion fragments. This efficient first stage reduces the data sufficiently that commonly used criteria can process the remaining information, or sophisticated filtering policies that may not scale to the raw reads can be used. AF4 provides both targeted and de novo fusion detection modes. We demonstrate both modes in benchmark simulated and real RNA-seq data as well as clinical and cell-line cfNA data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: AF4 is open sourced, licensed under Apache License 2.0, and is available at: https://github.com/grailbio/bio/tree/master/fusion.
Yasushi Saito, Arjun A. Rao, Hyunsung John Kim, Eric Scott, Matthew H. Larson, Wenying Pan, Mohini Desai, Earl Hubbell
Bioinform.10
2009 Resolving deconvolution ambiguity in gene alternative splicing
abstract
BACKGROUND: For many gene structures it is impossible to resolve intensity data uniquely to establish abundances of splice variants. This was empirically noted by Wang et al. in which it was called a "degeneracy problem". The ambiguity results from an ill-posed problem where additional information is needed in order to obtain an unique answer in splice variant deconvolution. RESULTS: In this paper, we analyze the situations under which the problem occurs and perform a rigorous mathematical study which gives necessary and sufficient conditions on how many and what type of constraints are needed to resolve all ambiguity. This analysis is generally applicable to matrix models of splice variants. We explore the proposal that probe sequence information may provide sufficient additional constraints to resolve real-world instances. However, probe behavior cannot be predicted with sufficient accuracy by any existing probe sequence model, and so we present a Bayesian framework for estimating variant abundances by incorporating the prediction uncertainty from the micro-model of probe responsiveness into the macro-model of probe intensities. CONCLUSION: The matrix analysis of constraints provides a tool for detecting real-world instances in which additional constraints may be necessary to resolve splice variants. While purely mathematical constraints can be stated without error, real-world constraints may themselves be poorly resolved. Our Bayesian framework provides a generic solution to the problem of uniquely estimating transcript abundances given additional constraints that themselves may be uncertain, such as regression fit to probe sequence models. We demonstrate the efficacy of it by extensive simulations as well as various biological data.
Yiyuan She, Earl Hubbell, Hui Wang 0007
BMC Bioinform.2
2005 Dynamic model based algorithms for screening and genotyping over 100K SNPs on oligonucleotide microarrays
abstract
MOTIVATION: A high density of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) coverage on the genome is desirable and often an essential requirement for population genetics studies. Region-specific or chromosome-specific linkage studies also benefit from the availability of as many high quality SNPs as possible. The availability of millions of SNPs from both Perlegen and the public domain and the development of an efficient microarray-based assay for genotyping SNPs has brought up some interesting analytical challenges. Effective methods for the selection of optimal subsets of SNPs spanning the genome and methods for accurately calling genotypes from probe hybridization patterns have enabled the development of a new microarray-based system for robustly genotyping over 100,000 SNPs per sample. RESULTS: We introduce a new dynamic model-based algorithm (DM) for screening over 3 million SNPs and genotyping over 100,000 SNPs. The model is based on four possible underlying states: Null, A, AB and B for each probe quartet. We calculate a probe-level log likelihood for each model and then select between the four competing models with an SNP-level statistical aggregation across multiple probe quartets to provide a high-quality genotype call along with a quality measure of the call. We assess performance with HapMap reference genotypes, informative Mendelian inheritance relationship in families, and consistency between DM and another genotype classification method. At a call rate of 95.91% the concordance with reference genotypes from the HapMap Project is 99.81% based on over 1.5 million genotypes, the Mendelian error rate is 0.018% based on 10 trios, and the consistency between DM and MPAM is 99.90% at a comparable rate of 97.18%. We also develop methods for SNP selection and optimal probe selection. AVAILABILITY: The DM algorithm is available in Affymetrix's Genotyping Tools software package and in Affymetrix's GDAS software package. See http://www.affymetrix.com for further information. 10 K and 100 K mapping array data are available on the Affymetrix website.
Xiaojun Di, Hajime Matsuzaki, Teresa A. Webster, Earl Hubbell, Shoulian Dong, Dan Bartell, Jing Huang 0024, Richard Chiles, Geoffrey Yang, Mei-mei Shen, David Kulp, Giulia C. Kennedy, Rui Mei, Keith W. Jones, Simon Cawley
Bioinform.4
2002 Robust estimators for expression analysis
abstract
Abstract Motivation: We consider the problem of estimating values associated with gene expression from oligonucleotide arrays. Such estimates should linearly track concentration, yield non-negative results, have statistical guarantees of robustness against outliers, and allow estimates of significance and variance. Results: A hierarchy of simple models is used to design robust estimators meeting these goals for both stand alone and comparative experiments. This algorithm has been validated against an extensive panel of known spike experiments, and shows comparable performance to existing standards. Availability: Algorithms available commercially as part of the MAS 5.0 software package. Data sets available from the Affymetrix website. Contact: [email protected] Supplemental Information: http://www.affymetrix.com/community/publications/affymetrix/index.affx * To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Earl Hubbell, Rui Mei
Bioinform.1
2002 Analysis of high density expression microarrays with signed-rank call algorithms
abstract
MOTIVATION: We consider the detection of expressed genes and the comparison of them in different experiments with the high-density oligonucleotide microarrays. The results are summarized as the detection calls and comparison calls, and they should be robust against data outliers over a wide target concentration range. It is also helpful to provide parameters that can be adjusted by the user to balance specificity and sensitivity under various experimental conditions. RESULTS: We present rank-based algorithms for making detection and comparison calls on expression microarrays. The detection call algorithm utilizes the discrimination scores. The comparison call algorithm utilizes intensity differences. Both algorithms are based on Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. Several parameters in the algorithms can be adjusted by the user to alter levels of specificity and sensitivity. The algorithms were developed and analyzed using spiked-in genes arrayed in a Latin square format. In the call process, p-values are calculated to give a confidence level for the pertinent hypotheses. For comparison calls made between two arrays, two primary normalization factors are defined. To overcome the difficulty that constant normalization factors do not fit all probe sets, we perturb these primary normalization factors and make increasing or decreasing calls only if all resulting p-values fall within a defined critical region. Our algorithms also automatically handle scanner saturation.
Rui Mei, Xiaojun Di, Thomas B. Ryder, Earl Hubbell, S. Dee, Teresa A. Webster, C. A. Harrington, Ming-Hsiu Ho, J. Baid, S. P. Smeekens
Bioinform.5
1999 Fidelity Probes for DNA Arrays
Earl Hubbell, Pavel A. Pevzner
ISMB1