VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jarno Vanhatalo
dblp:01/5592
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-6831-0211ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 97% Trustworthy machine learning · 3% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › feature selection
bayesian variable selection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Gaussian process model and Bayesian variable selection for mapping function-valued quantitative traits with incomplete phenotypic data · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
quantitative trait locus mapping |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Gaussian process model and Bayesian variable selection for mapping function-valued quantitative traits with incomplete phenotypic data · Bioinform. 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process regression |
0.2 | 2 | 2011 | Robust Gaussian Process Regression with a Student-t Likelihood · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 Gaussian process regression with Student-t likelihood · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | GPstuff: Bayesian modeling with Gaussian processes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › gaussian process regression
robust gaussian process regression |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Robust Gaussian Process Regression with a Student-t Likelihood · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Gaussian process regression with Student-t likelihood · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
laplace approximation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Gaussian process regression with Student-t likelihood · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Gaussian process regression with Student-t likelihood · NIPS 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gaussian process · 0.5bayesian inference · 0.5wavelets · 0.4penalized b-splines · 0.4student-t likelihood · 0.1gaussian process regression · 0.1variational approximation · 0.1scale mixture representation · 0.1markov chain monte carlo · 0.1laplace approximation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | A Gaussian process model and Bayesian variable selection for mapping function-valued quantitative traits with incomplete phenotypic dataabstractMOTIVATION: Recent advances in high dimensional phenotyping bring time as an extra dimension into the phenotypes. This promotes the quantitative trait locus (QTL) studies of function-valued traits such as those related to growth and development. Existing approaches for analyzing functional traits utilize either parametric methods or semi-parametric approaches based on splines and wavelets. However, very limited choices of software tools are currently available for practical implementation of functional QTL mapping and variable selection. RESULTS: We propose a Bayesian Gaussian process (GP) approach for functional QTL mapping. We use GPs to model the continuously varying coefficients which describe how the effects of molecular markers on the quantitative trait are changing over time. We use an efficient gradient based algorithm to estimate the tuning parameters of GPs. Notably, the GP approach is directly applicable to the incomplete datasets having even larger than 50% missing data rate (among phenotypes). We further develop a stepwise algorithm to search through the model space in terms of genetic variants, and use a minimal increase of Bayesian posterior probability as a stopping rule to focus on only a small set of putative QTL. We also discuss the connection between GP and penalized B-splines and wavelets. On two simulated and three real datasets, our GP approach demonstrates great flexibility for modeling different types of phenotypic trajectories with low computational cost. The proposed model selection approach finds the most likely QTL reliably in tested datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Software and simulated data are available as a MATLAB package 'GPQTLmapping', and they can be downloaded from GitHub (https://github.com/jpvanhat/GPQTLmapping). Real datasets used in case studies are publicly available at QTL Archive. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jarno Vanhatalo, Mikko J. Sillanpää |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2013 | GPstuff: Bayesian modeling with Gaussian processes
Jarno Vanhatalo, Jaakko Riihimäki, Jouni Hartikainen, Pasi Jylänki, Ville Tolvanen, Aki Vehtari |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2011 | Robust Gaussian Process Regression with a Student-t Likelihood
Pasi Jylänki, Jarno Vanhatalo, Aki Vehtari |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2010 | Speeding up the binary Gaussian process classification
Jarno Vanhatalo, Aki Vehtari |
UAI | 1 |
| 2009 | Gaussian process regression with Student-t likelihoodabstractIn the Gaussian process regression the observation model is commonly assumed to be Gaussian, which is convenient in computational perspective. However, the drawback is that the predictive accuracy of the model can be significantly compromised if the observations are contaminated by outliers. A robust observation model, such as the Student-t distribution, reduces the influence of outlying observations and improves the predictions. The problem, however, is the analytically intractable inference. In this work, we discuss the properties of a Gaussian process regression model with the Student-t likelihood and utilize the Laplace approximation for approximate inference. We compare our approach to a variational approximation and a Markov chain Monte Carlo scheme, which utilize the commonly used scale mixture representation of the Student-t distribution. Jarno Vanhatalo, Pasi Jylänki, Aki Vehtari |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2008 | Modelling local and global phenomena with sparse Gaussian processes
Jarno Vanhatalo, Aki Vehtari |
UAI | 1 |