Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arvind Raghunathan
dblp:01/6649
· DBLP profile ↗
15ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 10Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
8 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 94% Approximation and online algorithms · 4% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 1% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 77% Representation and self-supervised learning · 23% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers |
Memory systems · 29% Embedded and real-time systems · 28% Cloud and datacenter computing · 24% |
Topics — the 27 heaviest of 29, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Constrained Optimization From a Control Perspective via Feedback Linearization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › nonlinear optimization
sequential quadratic programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Constrained Optimization From a Control Perspective via Feedback Linearization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric deep learning
3d feature learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Learning to Rank 3D Features · ECCV (1) 2014 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms |
0.0 | 3 | 1993 | On-line algorithms for cache sharing · STOC 1993 Online Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints · STOC 1990 Online Algorithms for Finger Searching (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
online algorithms |
0.0 | 2 | 1993 | On-line algorithms for cache sharing · STOC 1993 Online Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints · STOC 1990 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
online scheduling |
0.0 | 2 | 1991 | On the competitiveness of on-line real-time task scheduling · RTSS 1991 On-line Scheduling in the Presence of Overload · FOCS 1991 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
server problems |
0.0 | 2 | 1990 | Online Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints · STOC 1990 Online Algorithms for Finger Searching (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990 |
Memory systems
cache management |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | On-line algorithms for cache sharing · STOC 1993 |
Memory systems › cache management
cache sharing |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | On-line algorithms for cache sharing · STOC 1993 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
caching |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | On-line algorithms for cache sharing · STOC 1993 |
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling |
0.0 | 2 | 1991 | On-line Scheduling in the Presence of Overload · FOCS 1991 On the competitiveness of on-line real-time task scheduling · RTSS 1991 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
competitive analysis |
0.0 | 2 | 1991 | On the competitiveness of on-line real-time task scheduling · RTSS 1991 Online Algorithms for Finger Searching (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
overload scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | On-line Scheduling in the Presence of Overload · FOCS 1991 |
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
checkpointing |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Online Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints · STOC 1990 |
Distributed systems › fault tolerance › checkpointing
checkpoint placement |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Online Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints · STOC 1990 |
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures › search trees
finger search |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Online Algorithms for Finger Searching (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990 |
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design
search structures |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Online Algorithms for Finger Searching (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph minors
forbidden minors |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Constructive Results from Graph Minors: Linkless Embeddings · FOCS 1988 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph minors |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Constructive Results from Graph Minors: Linkless Embeddings · FOCS 1988 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
topological graph theory |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Constructive Results from Graph Minors: Linkless Embeddings · FOCS 1988 |
Operating systems › resource management
memory management |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | On-line algorithms for cache sharing · STOC 1993 |
Operating systems › resource management › memory management
page replacement |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | On-line algorithms for cache sharing · STOC 1993 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
online real-time scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | On the competitiveness of on-line real-time task scheduling · RTSS 1991 |
Algorithms and data structures
priority queues |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | On-line Scheduling in the Presence of Overload · FOCS 1991 |
Distributed computing theory
checkpointing |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Online Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints · STOC 1990 |
Coding theory
source coding |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Online Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints · STOC 1990 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph classes
perfect graph |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Covering Orthogonal Polygons with Star Polygons: The Perfect Graph Approach · SCG 1988 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
momentum acceleration · 0.9feedback linearization · 0.9learning to rank · 0.2competitive analysis · 0.1online algorithm design · 0.0online algorithms · 0.0online algorithm · 0.0forking servers · 0.0topological graph theory · 0.0perfect graph approach · 0.0graph minor theory · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Constrained Optimization From a Control Perspective via Feedback LinearizationabstractTools from control and dynamical systems have proven valuable for analyzing and developing optimization methods. In this paper, we establish rigorous theoretical foundations for using feedback linearization—a well-established nonlinear control technique—to solve constrained optimization problems. For equality-constrained optimization, we establish global convergence rates to first-order Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) points and uncover the close connection between the FL method and the Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) algorithm. Building on this relationship, we extend the FL approach to handle inequality-constrained problems. Furthermore, we introduce a momentum-accelerated feedback linearization algorithm and provide a rigorous convergence guarantee. Runyu Zhang 0001, Arvind Raghunathan, Jeff S. Shamma, Na Li 0002 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2014 | Learning to Rank 3D Features
Oncel Tuzel, Ming-Yu Liu 0001, Yuichi Taguchi, Arvind Raghunathan |
ECCV (1) | 4 |
| 1994 | On-Line Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints
Marshall W. Bern, Daniel H. Greene, Arvind Raghunathan, Madhu Sudan 0001 |
Algorithmica | 3 |
| 1994 | Asynchronous PRAMs with Memory Latency
Chip Martel, Arvind Raghunathan |
J. Parallel Distributed Comput. | 2 |
| 1993 | On-line algorithms for cache sharingabstractA single physical computer memory may be used for more than one type of page, with the amount of memory devoted to each type under software control.For example, the effective size of memory can be increased by storing some pages in compressed form and decompressing on demand.This introduces another level to the memory hierarchy, and the sizes of two adjacent levels may be varied dynamically.We present an algorithm for varying the mixture of pages in a two-type cache, and then analyze the "competitiveness" of our algorithm.We also report progress in partially automating the design and analysis of on-line algorithms. Marshall W. Bern, Daniel H. Greene, Arvind Raghunathan |
STOC | 3 |
| 1992 | On the Competitiveness of On-Line Real-Time Task Scheduling
Sanjoy Baruah, Gilad Koren, Decao Mao, Bud Mishra, Arvind Raghunathan, Louis E. Rosier, Dennis E. Shasha, Fuxing Wang |
Real Time Syst. | 5 |
| 1992 | The Problem of Compatible RepresentativesabstractThis paper attaches a name to a natural class of combinatorial problems and points out that the class includes many important special cases. One special case, a simple problem of placing nonoverlapping labels on a rectangular map, is shown to be NP-complete. Donald E. Knuth, Arvind Raghunathan |
SIAM J. Discret. Math. | 2 |
| 1991 | On-line Scheduling in the Presence of OverloadabstractThe preemptive scheduling of sporadic tasks on a uniprocessor is considered. A task may arrive at any time, and is characterized by a value that reflects its importance, an execution time that is the amount of processor time needed to completely execute the task, and a deadline by which the task is to complete execution. The goal is to maximize the sum of the values of the completed tasks. An online scheduling algorithm that achieves optimal performance when the system is underloaded and provides a nontrivial performance guarantee when the system is overloaded is designed. The algorithm is implemented using simple data structures to run at a cost of O(log n) time per task, where n bounds the number of tasks in the system at any instant. Upper bounds on the best performance guarantee obtainable by an online algorithm in a variety of settings are derived.> Sanjoy Baruah, Gilad Koren, Bud Mishra, Arvind Raghunathan, Louis E. Rosier, Dennis E. Shasha |
FOCS | 4 |
| 1991 | On the competitiveness of on-line real-time task schedulingabstractThe authors study the performance of online algorithms in environments where no value is obtained for the partial execution of a request. They prove that no online scheduling algorithm can have a competitive factor greater than 0.25 times the optimal. They further refine this bound by considering the effect of the loading factor. Other models of task systems (for example, tasks systems consisting of many types of task requests), are considered. Similar upper bounds on the competitive factor that can be made by online scheduling algorithms in these environments are proved. It is shown that the performance bound of 0.25 is tight by means of a simple online uniprocessor scheduling algorithm has a competitive factor of 1/4. The authors extend the discussion to systems with dual processors. They show that the upper bound for the dual-processor online scheduling problem is 1/2 if all tasks have the same value density. This bound is tight if the tasks all also have zero laxity.> Sanjoy Baruah, Gilad Koren, Decao Mao, Bud Mishra, Arvind Raghunathan, Louis E. Rosier, Dennis E. Shasha, Fuxing Wang |
RTSS | 5 |
| 1990 | Online Algorithms for Finger Searching (Extended Abstract)abstractThe technique of speeding up access into search structures by maintaining fingers that point to various locations of the search structure is considered. The problem of choosing, in a large search structure, locations at which to maintain fingers is treated. In particular, a server problem in which k servers move along a line segment of length m, where m is the number of keys in the search structure, is addressed. Since fingers may be arbitrarily copied, a server is allowed to jump, or fork, to a location currently occupied by another server. Online algorithms are presented and their competitiveness analyzed. It is shown that the case in which k=2 behaves differently from the case in which k>or=3, by showing that there is a four-competitive algorithm for k=2 that never forks its fingers. For k>or=3, it is shown that any online algorithm that does not fork its fingers can be at most Omega (m/sup 1/2/)-competitive. The main result is that for k=3 there is an online algorithm that forks and is constant competitive (independent of m, the size of the search structure). The algorithm is simple and implementable.> Richard Cole 0001, Arvind Raghunathan |
FOCS | 2 |
| 1990 | Online Algorithms for Locating CheckpointsabstractMotivated by applications in data compression, debugging, and physical simulation, we consider the problem of adaptively choosing locations in a long computation at which to save intermediate results.Such checkpoints allow faster recomputation of arbitrary requested points within the computation.We abstract the problem to a server problem in which k servers move along a line in a single direction, modeling the fact that most computations are not reversible.Since checkpoints may be arbitrarily copied, we allow a server to jump to any location currently occupied by another server.We present online algorithms and analyze their competitiveness.We give lower bounds on the competitiveness of any online algorithm and show that our algorithms achieve these bounds within relatively small factors. Marshall W. Bern, Daniel H. Greene, Arvind Raghunathan, Madhu Sudan 0001 |
STOC | 3 |
| 1990 | Covering Orthogonal Polygons with Star Polygons: The Perfect Graph Approach
Rajeev Motwani 0001, Arvind Raghunathan, Huzur Saran |
J. Comput. Syst. Sci. | 2 |
| 1989 | Perfect Graphs and Orthogonally Convex CoversabstractThe combinatorial structure of visibility in simple orthogonal polygons is studied. It is shown that the visibility graph of a horizontally or vertically convex polygon is a permutation graph. In general, orthogonal polygons can have concavities (dents) with four possible orientations. In the case where the polygon has three dent orientations, it is shown that the visibility graph is weakly triangulated. Since weakly triangulated graphs are perfect, a polynomial algorithm for this polygon covering problem is obtained. Furthermore, the following duality relationship is obtained. The minimum number of orthogonally convex polygons needed to cover an orthogonal polygon P with at most three dent orientations is equal to the maximum number of points of P, no two of which can be contained together in an orthogonally convex covering polygon. Finally, it shown that in the case of orthogonal polygons with all four dent orientations, the above duality relationship fails to hold. Rajeev Motwani 0001, Arvind Raghunathan, Huzur Saran |
SIAM J. Discret. Math. | 2 |
| 1988 | Covering Orthogonal Polygons with Star Polygons: The Perfect Graph ApproachabstractWe consider the problem of covering simple orthogonal polygons with star polygons. A star polygon contains a point p, such that for every point q in the star polygon, there is an orthogonally convex polygon containing p and q. Rajeev Motwani 0001, Arvind Raghunathan, Huzur Saran |
SCG | 2 |
| 1988 | Constructive Results from Graph Minors: Linkless EmbeddingsabstractA formal study of three-dimensional topological graph theory is initiated. The problem of deciding whether a graph can be embedded in 3-space so that no collection of vertex-disjoint cycles is topologically linked is considered first. The Robertson-Seymour Theory of Graph Minors is applicable to this problem and guarantees the existence of an O(n/sup 3/) algorithm for the decision problem. However, not even a finite-time decision procedure was known for this problem. A small set of forbidden minors for linkless embeddable graphs is exhibited, and it is shown that any graph with these minors cannot be embedded without linked cycles. It is further established that any graph that does not contain these minors is embeddable without linked cycles. Thus, an O(n/sup 3/) algorithm for the decision problem is demonstrated. It is believed that the proof technique will lead to an algorithm for actually embedding a graph, provided it does not contain the forbidden minors.> Rajeev Motwani 0001, Arvind Raghunathan, Huzur Saran |
FOCS | 2 |