Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nora Pierstorff

dblp:01/6903 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › regulatory element discovery
cis-regulatory module prediction
0.112006
Identifying cis-regulatory modules by combining comparative and compositional analysis of DNA · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics
0.112006
Identifying cis-regulatory modules by combining comparative and compositional analysis of DNA · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.112006
Identifying cis-regulatory modules by combining comparative and compositional analysis of DNA · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
regulatory genomics
0.112006
Identifying cis-regulatory modules by combining comparative and compositional analysis of DNA · Bioinform. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ungapped sequence alignment · 0.1compositional analysis of DNA · 0.1comparative genomic analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Identifying cis-regulatory modules by combining comparative and compositional analysis of DNA
abstract
MOTIVATION: Predicting cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) in higher eukaryotes is a challenging computational task. Commonly used methods to predict CRMs based on the signal of transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) are limited by prior information about transcription factor specificity. More general methods that bypass the reliance on TFBS models are needed for comprehensive CRM prediction. RESULTS: We have developed a method to predict CRMs called CisPlusFinder that identifies high density regions of perfect local ungapped sequences (PLUSs) based on multiple species conservation. By assuming that PLUSs contain core TFBS motifs that are locally overrepresented, the method attempts to capture the expected features of CRM structure and evolution. Applied to a benchmark dataset of CRMs involved in early Drosophila development, CisPlusFinder predicts more annotated CRMs than all other methods tested. Using the REDfly database, we find that some 'false positive' predictions in the benchmark dataset correspond to recently annotated CRMs. Our work demonstrates that CRM prediction methods that combine comparative genomic data with statistical properties of DNA may achieve reasonable performance when applied genome-wide in the absence of an a priori set of known TFBS motifs. AVAILABILITY: The program CisPlusFinder can be downloaded at http://jakob.genetik.uni-koeln.de/bioinformatik/people/nora/nora.html. All software is licensed under the Lesser GNU Public License (LGPL).
Nora Pierstorff, Casey M. Bergman, Thomas Wiehe
Bioinform.1
2005 Genome comparison without alignment using shortest unique substrings
abstract
BACKGROUND: Sequence comparison by alignment is a fundamental tool of molecular biology. In this paper we show how a number of sequence comparison tasks, including the detection of unique genomic regions, can be accomplished efficiently without an alignment step. Our procedure for nucleotide sequence comparison is based on shortest unique substrings. These are substrings which occur only once within the sequence or set of sequences analysed and which cannot be further reduced in length without losing the property of uniqueness. Such substrings can be detected using generalized suffix trees. RESULTS: We find that the shortest unique substrings in Caenorhabditis elegans, human and mouse are no longer than 11 bp in the autosomes of these organisms. In mouse and human these unique substrings are significantly clustered in upstream regions of known genes. Moreover, the probability of finding such short unique substrings in the genomes of human or mouse by chance is extremely small. We derive an analytical expression for the null distribution of shortest unique substrings, given the GC-content of the query sequences. Furthermore, we apply our method to rapidly detect unique genomic regions in the genome of Staphylococcus aureus strain MSSA476 compared to four other staphylococcal genomes. CONCLUSION: We combine a method to rapidly search for shortest unique substrings in DNA sequences and a derivation of their null distribution. We show that unique regions in an arbitrary sample of genomes can be efficiently detected with this method. The corresponding programs shustring (SHortest Unique subSTRING) and shulen are written in C and available at http://adenine.biz.fh-weihenstephan.de/shustring/.
Bernhard Haubold, Nora Pierstorff, Friedrich Möller, Thomas Wiehe
BMC Bioinform.2