Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

R. Nelson

dblp:02/1383 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 87% Distributed systems · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation › parallel system performance
parallel performance modeling
0.011995
Bounds on the Speedup and Efficiency of Partial Synchronization in Parallel Processing Systems · J. ACM 1995
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.011995
Bounds on the Speedup and Efficiency of Partial Synchronization in Parallel Processing Systems · J. ACM 1995
Distributed systems › consensus
partial synchrony
0.011995
Bounds on the Speedup and Efficiency of Partial Synchronization in Parallel Processing Systems · J. ACM 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic modeling · 0.0queueing theory · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 The future of networks and network security
R. Nelson
SEC1
1995 Bounds on the Speedup and Efficiency of Partial Synchronization in Parallel Processing Systems
abstract
In this paper, we derive bounds on the speedup and efficiency of applications that schedule tasks on a set of parallel processors. We assume that the application runs an algorithm that consists of N iterations and before starting its i +1st iteration, a processor must wait for data (i.e., synchronize) calculated in the i th iteration by a subset of the other processors of the system. Processing times and interconnections between iterations are modeled by random variables with possibly deterministic distributions. Scientific applications consisting of iterations of recursive equations are examples of such applications that can be modeled within this formulation. We consider the efficiency of applications and show that, although efficiency decreases with an increase in the number of processors, it has a nonzero limit when the number of processors increases to infinity. We obtain a lower bound for the efficiency by solving an equation that depends on the distribution of task service times and the expected number of tasks needed to be synchronized. We also show that the lower bound is approached if the topology of the processor graph is ldquo;spread-out,” a notion we define in the paper.
R. Nelson
J. ACM2