Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

W. Harry Plantinga

dblp:02/1772 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Computational geometry · 76% Automated reasoning and model checking · 12% Computational complexity · 12%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational geometry › visibility
aspect graphs
0.021990
Visibility, occlusion, and the aspect graph · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1990
An Algorithm for Constructing the Aspect Graph · FOCS 1986
Computer vision › 3D vision › spatial understanding
occlusion analysis
0.011990
Visibility, occlusion, and the aspect graph · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1990
Computational geometry
motion planning
0.011985
On the complexity of reachability and motion planning questions (extended abstract) · SCG 1985
Computational geometry › motion planning
motion planning complexity
0.011985
On the complexity of reachability and motion planning questions (extended abstract) · SCG 1985
Computational complexity › complexity classes › PSPACE
PSPACE-completeness
0.011985
On the complexity of reachability and motion planning questions (extended abstract) · SCG 1985
Automated reasoning and model checking
reachability
0.011985
On the complexity of reachability and motion planning questions (extended abstract) · SCG 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

aspect graph construction · 0.0worst-case optimal algorithms · 0.0combinatorial bounds · 0.0complexity reduction · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 Visibility, occlusion, and the aspect graph
W. Harry Plantinga, Charles R. Dyer
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1
1986 An Algorithm for Constructing the Aspect Graph
abstract
In this paper we present tight bounds on the maximum size of aspect graphs and give worstcase optimal algorithms for their construction, first in the convex case and then in the general case. In particular, we give upper and lower bounds on the maximum size (including vertex labels) of Θ(n3) and Θ(n5) and algorithms for constructing the aspect graph which run in time O(n3) and O(n5) for the convex and general cases respectively. The algorithm for the general case makes use of a new 3D object representation called the aspect representation or asp. We also show a different way to label the aspect graph in order to save a factor of n in the asymptotic size (at the expense of label retrieval time) in both the convex and general cases, and we suggest alternatives to the aspect graph which require less space and store more information.
W. Harry Plantinga, Charles R. Dyer
FOCS1
1985 On the complexity of reachability and motion planning questions (extended abstract)
abstract
In this paper we consider from a theoretical viewpoint the complexity of some reachability and motion planning questions. Specifically, we are interested in determining which generalizations of the basic mover's problem result in computationally intractable problems. It has been shown that for any set of motion-planning problems with bounded degree of freedom, there is a polynomial-time algorithm to solve the motion-planning problem (although the degree of the polynomial may be large), but the two most basic generalizations to the problem, multiple movable obstacles and conformable objects, result in much harder problems. It has been shown that the warehouseman's problem is P-space hard: in this paper we show that the reachability problem for one of the simplest types of conformable objects, a two-dimensional linear (“robot arm”) linkage, is P-space complete. In addition, we demonstrate some motion-planning problems that take exponential time.
Deborah A. Joseph, W. Harry Plantinga
SCG2