VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
W. Harry Plantinga
dblp:02/1772
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Computational geometry · 76% Automated reasoning and model checking · 12% Computational complexity · 12% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational geometry › visibility
aspect graphs |
0.0 | 2 | 1990 | Visibility, occlusion, and the aspect graph · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1990 An Algorithm for Constructing the Aspect Graph · FOCS 1986 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › spatial understanding
occlusion analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Visibility, occlusion, and the aspect graph · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1990 |
Computational geometry
motion planning |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | On the complexity of reachability and motion planning questions (extended abstract) · SCG 1985 |
Computational geometry › motion planning
motion planning complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | On the complexity of reachability and motion planning questions (extended abstract) · SCG 1985 |
Computational complexity › complexity classes › PSPACE
PSPACE-completeness |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | On the complexity of reachability and motion planning questions (extended abstract) · SCG 1985 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
reachability |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | On the complexity of reachability and motion planning questions (extended abstract) · SCG 1985 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
aspect graph construction · 0.0worst-case optimal algorithms · 0.0combinatorial bounds · 0.0complexity reduction · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | Visibility, occlusion, and the aspect graph
W. Harry Plantinga, Charles R. Dyer |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 1 |
| 1986 | An Algorithm for Constructing the Aspect GraphabstractIn this paper we present tight bounds on the maximum size of aspect graphs and give worstcase optimal algorithms for their construction, first in the convex case and then in the general case. In particular, we give upper and lower bounds on the maximum size (including vertex labels) of Θ(n3) and Θ(n5) and algorithms for constructing the aspect graph which run in time O(n3) and O(n5) for the convex and general cases respectively. The algorithm for the general case makes use of a new 3D object representation called the aspect representation or asp. We also show a different way to label the aspect graph in order to save a factor of n in the asymptotic size (at the expense of label retrieval time) in both the convex and general cases, and we suggest alternatives to the aspect graph which require less space and store more information. W. Harry Plantinga, Charles R. Dyer |
FOCS | 1 |
| 1985 | On the complexity of reachability and motion planning questions (extended abstract)abstractIn this paper we consider from a theoretical viewpoint the complexity of some reachability and motion planning questions. Specifically, we are interested in determining which generalizations of the basic mover's problem result in computationally intractable problems. It has been shown that for any set of motion-planning problems with bounded degree of freedom, there is a polynomial-time algorithm to solve the motion-planning problem (although the degree of the polynomial may be large), but the two most basic generalizations to the problem, multiple movable obstacles and conformable objects, result in much harder problems. It has been shown that the warehouseman's problem is P-space hard: in this paper we show that the reachability problem for one of the simplest types of conformable objects, a two-dimensional linear (“robot arm”) linkage, is P-space complete. In addition, we demonstrate some motion-planning problems that take exponential time. Deborah A. Joseph, W. Harry Plantinga |
SCG | 2 |