Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joël Janin
dblp:02/6550
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 79% Computational science and engineering · 21% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
machine learning classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | DiMoVo: a Voronoi tessellation-based method for discriminating crystallographic and biological protein-protein interactions · Bioinform. 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis
protein-protein interaction |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | DiMoVo: a Voronoi tessellation-based method for discriminating crystallographic and biological protein-protein interactions · Bioinform. 2008 |
Computational science and engineering › computational geometry
voronoi tessellation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | DiMoVo: a Voronoi tessellation-based method for discriminating crystallographic and biological protein-protein interactions · Bioinform. 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein-protein docking |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | A new protein-protein docking scoring function based on interface residue properties · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › molecular modeling
scoring function |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | A new protein-protein docking scoring function based on interface residue properties · Bioinform. 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
voronoi tessellation · 0.2machine learning · 0.1support vector machine · 0.1logistic regression · 0.1genetic algorithm · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | DiMoVo: a Voronoi tessellation-based method for discriminating crystallographic and biological protein-protein interactionsabstractMOTIVATION: Knowledge of the oligomeric state of a protein is often essential for understanding its function and mechanism. Within a protein crystal, each protein monomer is in contact with many others, forming many small interfaces and a few larger ones that are biologically significant if the protein is a homodimer in solution, but not if the protein is monomeric. Telling such 'crystal dimers' from real ones remains a difficult task. RESULTS: It has already been demonstrated that the interfaces of native and non-native protein-protein complexes can be distinguished using a combination of parameters computed with a method on the Voronoi tessellation. We show in this article that the same parameters highlight significant differences between the interfaces of biological and crystal dimers. Using these parameters as descriptors in machine learning methods leads to accurate classification of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces. AVAILABILITY: Software is available at http://fifi.ibbmc.u-psud.fr/DiMoVo. Julie Bernauer, Ranjit Prasad Bahadur, Francis Rodier, Joël Janin, Anne Poupon |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2007 | A new protein-protein docking scoring function based on interface residue propertiesabstractMOTIVATION: Protein-protein complexes are known to play key roles in many cellular processes. However, they are often not accessible to experimental study because of their low stability and difficulty to produce the proteins and assemble them in native conformation. Thus, docking algorithms have been developed to provide an in silico approach of the problem. A protein-protein docking procedure traditionally consists of two successive tasks: a search algorithm generates a large number of candidate solutions, and then a scoring function is used to rank them. RESULTS: To address the second step, we developed a scoring function based on a Voronoï tessellation of the protein three-dimensional structure. We showed that the Voronoï representation may be used to describe in a simplified but useful manner, the geometric and physico-chemical complementarities of two molecular surfaces. We measured a set of parameters on native protein-protein complexes and on decoys, and used them as attributes in several statistical learning procedures: a logistic function, Support Vector Machines (SVM), and a genetic algorithm. For the later, we used ROGER, a genetic algorithm designed to optimize the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. To further test the scores derived with ROGER, we ranked models generated by two different docking algorithms on targets of a blind prediction experiment, improving in almost all cases the rank of native-like solutions. AVAILABILITY: http://genomics.eu.org/spip/-Bioinformatics-tools- Julie Bernauer, Jérôme Azé, Joël Janin, Anne Poupon |
Bioinform. | 3 |