Bryan G. Hickerson

dblp:02/9517 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Electronic design automation · 89% Parallel and multicore computing · 11%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.422014
Coverage Learned Targeted Validation for Incremental HW Changes · DAC 2014
Verification of Transactional Memory in POWER8 · DAC 2014
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
coverage analysis
0.312017
Template Aware Coverage: Taking Coverage Analysis to the Next Level · DAC 2017
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › coverage-driven verification
coverage closure
0.312017
Template Aware Coverage: Taking Coverage Analysis to the Next Level · DAC 2017
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.312017
Template Aware Coverage: Taking Coverage Analysis to the Next Level · DAC 2017
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
processor verification
0.212014
Verification of Transactional Memory in POWER8 · DAC 2014
Parallel and multicore computing
transactional memory
0.212014
Verification of Transactional Memory in POWER8 · DAC 2014
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
coverage-driven verification
0.112014
Coverage Learned Targeted Validation for Incremental HW Changes · DAC 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pre-silicon simulation · 0.2post-silicon validation · 0.2machine learning · 0.2coverage learning · 0.2acceleration · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Template Aware Coverage: Taking Coverage Analysis to the Next Level
abstract
Understanding the relationship between coverage and test-templates (a generic term we use to describe the inputs for the random stimuli generator) is an important layer in understanding the state and progress of the verification process. Today, this is extremely hard to achieve and is based on expert knowledge. Template Aware Coverage (TAC) is a novel approach to meeting this challenge. Based on collecting statistics of the relations between coverage and test-templates, TAC maintains these statistics in efficient data structures. It also introduces analytics means to provide useful information based on this data. Template Aware Coverage is currently being used in the verification of a high-end processor systems, where it significantly helps hitting hard-to-hit coverage events as well as never hit events.
Raviv Gal, Einat Kermany, Bilal Saleh, Avi Ziv, Michael L. Behm, Bryan G. Hickerson
DAC6
2015 Data mining diagnostics and bug MRIs for HW bug localization
Monica Farkash, Bryan G. Hickerson, Balavinayagam Samynathan
DATE2
2014 Verification of Transactional Memory in POWER8
abstract
Transactional memory is a promising mechanism for synchronizing concurrent programs that eliminates locks at the expense of hardware complexity. Transactional memory is a hard feature to verify. First, transactions comprise several instructions that must be observed as a single global atomic operation. In addition, there are many reasons a transaction can fail. This results in a high level of non-determinism which must be tamed by the verification methodology. This paper describes the innovation that was applied to tools and methodology in pre-silicon simulation, acceleration and post-silicon in order to verify transactional memory in the IBM POWER8 processor core.
Allon Adir, Dave Goodman, Daniel Hershcovich, Oz Hershkovitz, Bryan G. Hickerson, Karen Holtz, Wisam Kadry, Anatoly Koyfman, John M. Ludden, Charles Meissner, Amir Nahir, Randall R. Pratt, Mike Schiffli, Brett St. Onge, Brian W. Thompto, Elena Tsanko, Avi Ziv
DAC5
2014 Coverage Learned Targeted Validation for Incremental HW Changes
abstract
This paper addresses the challenges of minimizing the time and resources required to validate the changes between two Hardware (HW) model iterations of the same design. It introduces CLTV (Coverage Learned Targeted Validation), an automatic framework which learns during the verification process of the HW and uses the learned information to target the areas of the design that are affected by the incremental HW model iterations.
Monica Farkash, Bryan G. Hickerson, Michael L. Behm
DAC2