Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jan Oblój

dblp:02/9640 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-5686-5498ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack
0.712023
Wasserstein distributional robustness of neural networks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.712023
Wasserstein distributional robustness of neural networks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributional robustness
0.712023
Wasserstein distributional robustness of neural networks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
Wasserstein distributional robustness of neural networks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributionally robust optimization
0.212023
Wasserstein distributional robustness of neural networks · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wasserstein distributionally robust optimization · 0.7projected gradient descent · 0.7fast gradient sign method · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Wasserstein distributional robustness of neural networks
abstract
Deep neural networks are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks (AA). For an image recognition task, this means that a small perturbation of the original can result in the image being misclassified. Design of such attacks as well as methods of adversarial training against them are subject of intense research. We re-cast the problem using techniques of Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization (DRO) and obtain novel contributions leveraging recent insights from DRO sensitivity analysis. We consider a set of distributional threat models. Unlike the traditional pointwise attacks, which assume a uniform bound on perturbation of each input data point, distributional threat models allow attackers to perturb inputs in a non-uniform way. We link these more general attacks with questions of out-of-sample performance and Knightian uncertainty. To evaluate the distributional robustness of neural networks, we propose a first-order AA algorithm and its multistep version. Our attack algorithms include Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) as special cases. Furthermore, we provide a new asymptotic estimate of the adversarial accuracy against distributional threat models. The bound is fast to compute and first-order accurate, offering new insights even for the pointwise AA. It also naturally yields out-of-sample performance guarantees. We conduct numerical experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, ImageNet datasets using DNNs on RobustBench to illustrate our theoretical results. Our code is available at https://github.com/JanObloj/W-DRO-Adversarial-Methods.
Xingjian Bai, Guangyi He, Jan Oblój
NeurIPS4