Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jan Oblój
dblp:02/9640
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-5686-5498ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Wasserstein distributional robustness of neural networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Wasserstein distributional robustness of neural networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributional robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Wasserstein distributional robustness of neural networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Wasserstein distributional robustness of neural networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributionally robust optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Wasserstein distributional robustness of neural networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
wasserstein distributionally robust optimization · 0.7projected gradient descent · 0.7fast gradient sign method · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Wasserstein distributional robustness of neural networksabstractDeep neural networks are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks (AA). For an image recognition task, this means that a small perturbation of the original can result in the image being misclassified. Design of such attacks as well as methods of adversarial training against them are subject of intense research. We re-cast the problem using techniques of Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization (DRO) and obtain novel contributions leveraging recent insights from DRO sensitivity analysis. We consider a set of distributional threat models. Unlike the traditional pointwise attacks, which assume a uniform bound on perturbation of each input data point, distributional threat models allow attackers to perturb inputs in a non-uniform way. We link these more general attacks with questions of out-of-sample performance and Knightian uncertainty. To evaluate the distributional robustness of neural networks, we propose a first-order AA algorithm and its multistep version. Our attack algorithms include Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) as special cases. Furthermore, we provide a new asymptotic estimate of the adversarial accuracy against distributional threat models. The bound is fast to compute and first-order accurate, offering new insights even for the pointwise AA. It also naturally yields out-of-sample performance guarantees. We conduct numerical experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, ImageNet datasets using DNNs on RobustBench to illustrate our theoretical results. Our code is available at https://github.com/JanObloj/W-DRO-Adversarial-Methods. Xingjian Bai, Guangyi He, Jan Oblój |
NeurIPS | 4 |