VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Suvrajeet Sen
dblp:03/3231
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-6285-8833ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 7 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Ensemble Variance Reduction Methods for Stochastic Mixed-Integer Programming and their Application to the Stochastic Facility Location ProblemabstractSample average approximation (SAA), the standard approach to stochastic mixed-integer programming, does not provide guidance for cases with limited computational budgets. In such settings, variance reduction is critical in identifying good decisions. This paper explores two closely related ensemble methods to determine effective decisions with a probabilistic guarantee. (a) The first approach recommends a decision by coordinating aggregation in the space of decisions as well as aggregation of objective values. This combination of aggregation methods generalizes the bagging method and the “compromise decision” of stochastic linear programming. Combining these concepts, we propose a stopping rule that provides an upper bound on the probability of early termination. (b) The second approach applies efficient computational budget allocation for objective function evaluation and contributes to identifying the best solution with a predicted lower bound on the probability of correct selection. It also reduces the variance of the upper bound estimate at optimality. Furthermore, it adaptively selects the evaluation sample size. Both approaches provide approximately optimal solutions even in cases with a huge number of scenarios, especially when scenarios are generated by using oracles/simulators. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of these methods via extensive computational results for “megascale” (extremely large scale) stochastic facility location problems. History: Accepted by Pascal Van Hentenryck, Area Editor for Computational Modeling: Methods & Analysis. Funding: This work was supported by The Office of Naval Research [Grant N00014-20-1-2077] and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research [Grant FA9550-20-1-0006]. Supplemental Material: The software that supports the findings of this study is available within the paper and its Supplemental Information ( https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/suppl/10.1287/ijoc.2021.0324 ) as well as from the IJOC GitHub software repository ( https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2021.0324 ). The complete IJOC Software and Data Repository is available at https://informsjoc.github.io/ . Suvrajeet Sen |
INFORMS J. Comput. | 2 |
| 2021 | Stochastic Decomposition for Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programs with Random Cost CoefficientsabstractStochastic decomposition (SD) has been a computationally effective approach to solve large-scale stochastic programming (SP) problems arising in practical applications. By using incremental sampling, this approach is designed to discover an appropriate sample size for a given SP instance, thus precluding the need for either scenario reduction or arbitrary sample sizes to create sample average approximations (SAA). When compared with the solutions obtained using the SAA procedure, SD provides solutions of similar quality in far less computational time using ordinarily available computational resources. However, previous versions of SD were not applicable to problems with randomness in second-stage cost coefficients. In this paper, we extend its capabilities by relaxing this assumption on cost coefficients in the second stage. In addition to the algorithmic enhancements necessary to achieve this, we also present the details of implementing these extensions, which preserve the computational edge of SD. Finally, we illustrate the computational results obtained from the latest implementation of SD on a variety of test instances generated for problems from the literature. We compare these results with those obtained from the regularized L-shaped method applied to the SAA function of these problems with different sample sizes. Harsha Gangammanavar, Suvrajeet Sen |
INFORMS J. Comput. | 3 |
| 2016 | Preface
Warren P. Adams, Suvrajeet Sen, J. Cole Smith |
J. Glob. Optim. | 2 |
| 2009 | Enhanced Cut Generation Methods for Decomposition-Based Branch and Cut for Two-Stage Stochastic Mixed-Integer ProgramsabstractThis paper is devoted to a study of computational speed-ups that may be possible in cut generation associated with decomposition-based branch-and-cut methods (e.g., D2-BAC) for stochastic mixed-integer programs (SMIPs). We discuss some bottlenecks in the cut generation process and suggest several enhancements to speed up this process. Our computational results show that significant improvements (approximately 50% reduction in computation times) may be possible by streamlining the computations associated with the cut generation process. This paper establishes new benchmarks for serial processing of two-stage SMIPs. Suvrajeet Sen |
INFORMS J. Comput. | 2 |
| 2005 | The Million-Variable "March" for Stochastic Combinatorial Optimization
Lewis Ntaimo, Suvrajeet Sen |
J. Glob. Optim. | 2 |
| 2000 | Duality Gaps in Stochastic Integer Programming
Suvrajeet Sen, Julia L. Higle, John R. Birge |
J. Glob. Optim. | 1 |
| 1985 | A branch and bound algorithm for extreme point mathematical programming problems
Suvrajeet Sen, Hanif D. Sherali |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 1 |