Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Richard T. Hurley

dblp:03/3909 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 83% Cloud and datacenter computing · 8% Performance modeling and evaluation · 8%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems › file systems
distributed file system
0.011996
File Migration and File Replication: A Symbiotic Relationship · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1996
Storage systems › file systems › distributed file system
file replication
0.011996
File Migration and File Replication: A Symbiotic Relationship · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1996
Storage systems
storage reliability
0.011996
File Migration and File Replication: A Symbiotic Relationship · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1996
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management
0.011996
File Migration and File Replication: A Symbiotic Relationship · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1996
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › simulation-based evaluation
simulation-based performance analysis
0.011996
File Migration and File Replication: A Symbiotic Relationship · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0performance modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Performance Benefits of Partitioning in a Web-Caching Environment
Richard T. Hurley, Wenying Feng 0001, B. Y. Li
CAINE1
2003 Partitioning in Distributed and Hierarchical Web-Caching Architectures: A Performance Comparison
Richard T. Hurley, Wenying Feng 0001, B. Y. Li
CAINE1
1996 File Migration and File Replication: A Symbiotic Relationship
abstract
Much of the past research on file migration and file replication has examined these two resource management strategies in isolation or in an environment where they do not work together. We establish through simulation that these two strategies can be utilized simultaneously to potentially provide significant performance benefits over a system without file migration or replication. File replication can be viewed as a natural extension to file migration, and thus, we derive a dynamic file replication policy based on an established file migration heuristic: a file is migrated (or replicated) whenever a reduction in total mean response time of the file requests currently in the affected storage sites can be achieved. Through our performance model, we use simulation to establish the conditions under which our file migration/replication policies are beneficial in a distributed file system.
Richard T. Hurley, Soon Aun Yeap
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.1
1994 Limited Effects of Finite Storage on a Beneficial File Migration Policy
abstract
With the availability of high-speed local-area networks, file migration becomes an attractive option in a distributed file system. However, certain limitations may exist which restrict the movement of files. One such limitation is that storage space is finite and thus, storage sites (file servers) can only store a limited number of files. We use simulation to show that for a homogeneous distributed file system which transfers whole files, migrating files from congested to uncongested storage sites can result in significant performance gains over a system without file migration even in the case of finite storage. Our file migration policy is based on an instantaneous performance gain analysis: a file is migrated only if it leads to a decrease in the overall response time of the file requests currently in the system. Our results indicate that as the system load or coefficient of variation of the file request interarrival times increase, so does the percentage improvement of our file migration policy over a system without file migration. The degradation in performance caused by limited storage space is only significant when the storage restrictions are extreme.>
Richard T. Hurley, James P. Black, Johnny W. Wong
LCN1