Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Hanke 0004
dblp:03/4509-4
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Audio and music processing · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
representational similarity analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Brains on Beats · NIPS 2016 |
Audio and music processing › music information retrieval
music tagging |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Brains on Beats · NIPS 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Brains on Beats · NIPS 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › neural coding
neural representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Brains on Beats · NIPS 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
representational similarity analysis · 0.8deep neural network · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Brains on BeatsabstractWe developed task-optimized deep neural networks (DNNs) that achieved state-of-the-art performance in different evaluation scenarios for automatic music tagging. These DNNs were subsequently used to probe the neural representations of music. Representational similarity analysis revealed the existence of a representational gradient across the superior temporal gyrus (STG). Anterior STG was shown to be more sensitive to low-level stimulus features encoded in shallow DNN layers whereas posterior STG was shown to be more sensitive to high-level stimulus features encoded in deep DNN layers. Umut Güçlü, Jordy Thielen, Michael Hanke 0004, Marcel van Gerven |
NIPS | 3 |