Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Hanke 0004

dblp:03/4509-4 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
representational similarity analysis
0.212016
Brains on Beats · NIPS 2016
Audio and music processing › music information retrieval
music tagging
0.212016
Brains on Beats · NIPS 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.112016
Brains on Beats · NIPS 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › neural coding
neural representation
0.112016
Brains on Beats · NIPS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

representational similarity analysis · 0.8deep neural network · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Brains on Beats
abstract
We developed task-optimized deep neural networks (DNNs) that achieved state-of-the-art performance in different evaluation scenarios for automatic music tagging. These DNNs were subsequently used to probe the neural representations of music. Representational similarity analysis revealed the existence of a representational gradient across the superior temporal gyrus (STG). Anterior STG was shown to be more sensitive to low-level stimulus features encoded in shallow DNN layers whereas posterior STG was shown to be more sensitive to high-level stimulus features encoded in deep DNN layers.
Umut Güçlü, Jordy Thielen, Michael Hanke 0004, Marcel van Gerven
NIPS3