Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Phillip J. Windley
dblp:03/603
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Electronic design automation · 76% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 24% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Formal Modeling and Verification of Microprocessors · IEEE Trans. Computers 1995 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
processor verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Formal Modeling and Verification of Microprocessors · IEEE Trans. Computers 1995 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | A Hierarchical Methodology for Verifying Microprogrammed Microprocessors · S&P 1990 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
microprogramming |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | A Hierarchical Methodology for Verifying Microprogrammed Microprocessors · S&P 1990 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction set architecture |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Formal Modeling and Verification of Microprocessors · IEEE Trans. Computers 1995 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hierarchical abstraction · 0.0abstract theories · 0.0HOL theorem proving · 0.0hierarchical verification · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | Alexandria: A Tool for Hierarchical Verification
Annette Bunker, Trent N. Larson, Michael D. Jones, Phillip J. Windley |
FMCAD | 4 |
| 1996 | Mechanically Checking a Lemma Used in an Automatic Verification Tool
Phillip J. Windley, Jerry R. Burch |
FMCAD | 1 |
| 1995 | Formal Modeling and Verification of MicroprocessorsabstractThis paper presents a methodology for microprocessor verification that significantly reduces the learning curve for performing verification. The methodology is formalized in the HOL theorem-proving system. The paper includes a description of a large case study performed to evaluate the methodology. The novel aspects of this research include the use of abstract theories to formalize hardware models. Because our model is described using abstract theories, it provides a framework for both the specification and the verification. This framework reduces the number of ad hoc modeling decisions that must be made to complete the verification. Another unique aspect of our research is the use of hierarchical abstractions to reduce the number of difficult lemmas in completing the verification. Our formalism frees the user from directly reasoning about the difficult aspects of modeling the hierarchy, namely the temporal and data abstractions. We believe that our formalism, coupled with case studies and tools, allows microprocessor verification to be done by engineers with relatively little experience in microprocessor specification or logic. We are currently testing that hypothesis by using the methodology to teach graduate students formal microprocessor modeling.> Phillip J. Windley |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 1 |
| 1990 | A Hierarchical Methodology for Verifying Microprogrammed Microprocessors
Phillip J. Windley |
S&P | 1 |