Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Phillip J. Windley

dblp:03/603 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 76% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 24%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.011995
Formal Modeling and Verification of Microprocessors · IEEE Trans. Computers 1995
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
processor verification
0.011995
Formal Modeling and Verification of Microprocessors · IEEE Trans. Computers 1995
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.011990
A Hierarchical Methodology for Verifying Microprogrammed Microprocessors · S&P 1990
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
microprogramming
0.011990
A Hierarchical Methodology for Verifying Microprogrammed Microprocessors · S&P 1990
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction set architecture
0.011995
Formal Modeling and Verification of Microprocessors · IEEE Trans. Computers 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hierarchical abstraction · 0.0abstract theories · 0.0HOL theorem proving · 0.0hierarchical verification · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Alexandria: A Tool for Hierarchical Verification
Annette Bunker, Trent N. Larson, Michael D. Jones, Phillip J. Windley
FMCAD4
1996 Mechanically Checking a Lemma Used in an Automatic Verification Tool
Phillip J. Windley, Jerry R. Burch
FMCAD1
1995 Formal Modeling and Verification of Microprocessors
abstract
This paper presents a methodology for microprocessor verification that significantly reduces the learning curve for performing verification. The methodology is formalized in the HOL theorem-proving system. The paper includes a description of a large case study performed to evaluate the methodology. The novel aspects of this research include the use of abstract theories to formalize hardware models. Because our model is described using abstract theories, it provides a framework for both the specification and the verification. This framework reduces the number of ad hoc modeling decisions that must be made to complete the verification. Another unique aspect of our research is the use of hierarchical abstractions to reduce the number of difficult lemmas in completing the verification. Our formalism frees the user from directly reasoning about the difficult aspects of modeling the hierarchy, namely the temporal and data abstractions. We believe that our formalism, coupled with case studies and tools, allows microprocessor verification to be done by engineers with relatively little experience in microprocessor specification or logic. We are currently testing that hypothesis by using the methodology to teach graduate students formal microprocessor modeling.>
Phillip J. Windley
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1990 A Hierarchical Methodology for Verifying Microprogrammed Microprocessors
Phillip J. Windley
S&P1