Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rajesh Raman

dblp:03/6704 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Cloud and datacenter computing · 54% Distributed systems · 44% High-performance computing · 2%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › distributed resource management
matchmaking
0.132003
Policy Driven Heterogeneous Resource Co-Allocation with Gangmatching · HPDC 2003
Resource Management through Multilateral Matchmaking · HPDC 2000
Matchmaking: Distributed Resource Management for High Throughput Computing · HPDC 1998
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management
0.132003
Policy Driven Heterogeneous Resource Co-Allocation with Gangmatching · HPDC 2003
Resource Management through Multilateral Matchmaking · HPDC 2000
Matchmaking: Distributed Resource Management for High Throughput Computing · HPDC 1998
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource allocation › multi-resource allocation
resource co-allocation
0.122003
Policy Driven Heterogeneous Resource Co-Allocation with Gangmatching · HPDC 2003
Resource Management through Multilateral Matchmaking · HPDC 2000
Distributed systems
distributed scheduling
0.011998
Matchmaking: Distributed Resource Management for High Throughput Computing · HPDC 1998
Distributed systems › distributed database
federated systems
0.022003
Policy Driven Heterogeneous Resource Co-Allocation with Gangmatching · HPDC 2003
Resource Management through Multilateral Matchmaking · HPDC 2000
High-performance computing
high-throughput computing
0.011998
Matchmaking: Distributed Resource Management for High Throughput Computing · HPDC 1998
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Policy Driven Heterogeneous Resource Co-Allocation with Gangmatching
abstract
Dynamic, heterogeneous and distributively owned resource environments present unique challenges to the problems of resource representation, allocation and management. Conventional resource management methods that rely on static models of resource allocation policy and behavior fail to address these challenges. We previously argued that Matchmaking provides an elegant and robust solution to resource management in such dynamic and federated environments. However, Matchmaking is limited by its purely bilateral formalism of matching a single customer with a single resource, precluding more advanced resource management services such as co-allocation. In this paper, we present Gangmatching, a multilateral extension to the Matchmaking model, and discuss the Gangmatching model and its associated implementation and performance issues in context of a real-world license management co-allocation problem.
Rajesh Raman, Miron Livny, Marvin H. Solomon
HPDC1
2000 Resource Management through Multilateral Matchmaking
abstract
Federated distributed systems present new challenges to resource management, which cannot be met by conventional systems that employ relatively static resource models and centralized allocators. We previously argued that matchmaking provides an elegant and robust resource management solution for these highly dynamic environments (R. Raman et al., 1998). Although powerful and flexible, multiparty policies (e.g., co-allocation) cannot be accommodated by matchmaking. The authors present Gang-Matching, a multilateral matchmaking formalism to address this deficiency.
Rajesh Raman, Miron Livny, Marvin H. Solomon
HPDC1
1998 Matchmaking: Distributed Resource Management for High Throughput Computing
abstract
Conventional resource management systems use a system model to describe resources and a centralized scheduler to control their allocation. We argue that this paradigm does not adapt well to distributed systems, particularly those built to support high throughput computing. Obstacles include heterogeneity of resources, which make uniform allocation algorithms difficult to formulate, and distributed ownership, leading to widely varying allocation policies. Faced with these problems, we developed and implemented the classified advertisement (classad) matchmaking framework, a flexible and general approach to resource management in distributed environment with decentralized ownership of resources. Novel aspects of the framework include a semi structured data model that combines schema, data, and query in a simple but powerful specification language, and a clean separation of the matching and claiming phases of resource allocation. The representation and protocols result in a robust, scalable and flexible framework that can evolve with changing resources. The framework was designed to solve real problems encountered in the deployment of Condor, a high throughput computing system developed at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Condor is heavily used by scientists at numerous sites around the world. It derives much of its robustness and efficiency from the matchmaking architecture.
Rajesh Raman, Miron Livny, Marvin H. Solomon
HPDC1