Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hugo J. W. L. Aerts
dblp:03/935
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2122-2003ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 65% Language models and text generation · 30% Information extraction and text analysis · 5% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 76% Medical and health informatics · 24% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Sparse Autoencoder Features for Classifications and Transferability · EMNLP 2025 Cross-Care: Assessing the Healthcare Implications of Pre-training Data on Language Model Bias · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sparse Autoencoder Features for Classifications and Transferability · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
sparse autoencoder |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sparse Autoencoder Features for Classifications and Transferability · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
demographic bias |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Cross-Care: Assessing the Healthcare Implications of Pre-training Data on Language Model Bias · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Cross-Care: Assessing the Healthcare Implications of Pre-training Data on Language Model Bias · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
abusive language detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Sparse Autoencoder Features for Classifications and Transferability · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Sparse Autoencoder Features for Classifications and Transferability · EMNLP 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational pharmacology
drug sensitivity analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | PharmacoGx: an R package for analysis of large pharmacogenomic datasets · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
pharmacogenomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | PharmacoGx: an R package for analysis of large pharmacogenomic datasets · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
toxicogenomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | diXa: a data infrastructure for chemical safety assessment · Bioinform. 2015 |
Data integration and cleaning
heterogeneous data integration |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | PharmacoGx: an R package for analysis of large pharmacogenomic datasets · Bioinform. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
benchmark framework · 1.5alignment method · 1.5sparse autoencoder · 0.9feature extraction · 0.9meta-analysis · 0.5connectivity map analysis · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Sparse Autoencoder Features for Classifications and TransferabilityabstractSparse Autoencoders (SAEs) provide potentials for uncovering structured, human-interpretable representations in Large Language Models (LLMs), making them a crucial tool for transparent and controllable AI systems.We systematically analyze SAE for interpretable feature extraction from LLMs in safety-critical classification tasks 1 .Our framework evaluates (1) model-layer selection and scaling properties, (2) SAE architectural configurations, including width and pooling strategies, and (3) the effect of binarizing continuous SAE activations.SAE-derived features achieve macro F1 > 0.8, outperforming hidden-state and BoW baselines while demonstrating cross-model transfer from Gemma 2 2B to 9B-IT models.These features generalize in a zero-shot manner to cross-lingual toxicity detection and visual classification tasks.Our analysis highlights the significant impact of pooling strategies and binarization thresholds, showing that binarization offers an efficient alternative to traditional feature selection while maintaining or improving performance.These findings establish new best practices for SAE-based interpretability and enable scalable, transparent deployment of LLMs in real-world applications. Jack Gallifant, Shan Chen 0004, Kuleen Sasse, Hugo J. W. L. Aerts, Thomas Hartvigsen, Danielle S. Bitterman |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2024 | Cross-Care: Assessing the Healthcare Implications of Pre-training Data on Language Model BiasabstractLarge language models (LLMs) are increasingly essential in processing natural languages, yet their application is frequently compromised by biases and inaccuracies originating in their training data.In this study, we introduce \textbf{Cross-Care}, the first benchmark framework dedicated to assessing biases and real world knowledge in LLMs, specifically focusing on the representation of disease prevalence across diverse demographic groups.We systematically evaluate how demographic biases embedded in pre-training corpora like $ThePile$ influence the outputs of LLMs.We expose and quantify discrepancies by juxtaposing these biases against actual disease prevalences in various U.S. demographic groups.Our results highlight substantial misalignment between LLM representation of disease prevalence and real disease prevalence rates across demographic subgroups, indicating a pronounced risk of bias propagation and a lack of real-world grounding for medical applications of LLMs.Furthermore, we observe that various alignment methods minimally resolve inconsistencies in the models' representation of disease prevalence across different languages.For further exploration and analysis, we make all data and a data visualization tool available at: \url{www.crosscare.net}. Shan Chen 0004, Jack Gallifant, Mingye Gao, Nikolaj Munch, Ajay Muthukkumar, Arvind Rajan, Jaya Kolluri, Amelia Fiske, Janna Hastings, Hugo J. W. L. Aerts, Brian Anthony 0001, Leo A. Celi, William G. La Cava, Danielle S. Bitterman |
NeurIPS | 11 |
| 2024 | medBERT.de: A comprehensive German BERT model for the medical domainabstractThis paper presents medBERT.de , a pre-trained German BERT model specifically designed for the German medical domain. The model has been trained on a large corpus of 4.7 Million German medical documents and has been shown to achieve new state-of-the-art performance on eight different medical benchmarks covering a wide range of disciplines and medical document types. In addition to evaluating the overall performance of the model, this paper also conducts a more in-depth analysis of its capabilities. We investigate the impact of data deduplication on the model's performance, as well as the potential benefits of using more efficient tokenization methods. Our results indicate that domain-specific models such as medBERT.de are particularly useful for longer texts, and that deduplication of training data does not necessarily lead to improved performance. Furthermore, we found that efficient tokenization plays only a minor role in improving model performance, and attribute most of the improved performance to the large amount of training data. To encourage further research, the pre-trained model weights and new benchmarks based on radiological data are made publicly available for use by the scientific community. Keno Bressem, Jens-Michalis Papaioannou, Paul Grundmann, Florian Borchert, Lisa Adams, Leonhard Liu, Felix Busch, Jan P. Loyen, Stefan Markus Niehues, Moritz Augustin, Lennart Grosser, Marcus R. Makowski, Hugo J. W. L. Aerts, Alexander Löser |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 14 |
| 2024 | Evaluating the ChatGPT family of models for biomedical reasoning and classificationabstractOBJECTIVE: Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive ability in biomedical question-answering, but have not been adequately investigated for more specific biomedical applications. This study investigates ChatGPT family of models (GPT-3.5, GPT-4) in biomedical tasks beyond question-answering. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated model performance with 11 122 samples for two fundamental tasks in the biomedical domain-classification (n = 8676) and reasoning (n = 2446). The first task involves classifying health advice in scientific literature, while the second task is detecting causal relations in biomedical literature. We used 20% of the dataset for prompt development, including zero- and few-shot settings with and without chain-of-thought (CoT). We then evaluated the best prompts from each setting on the remaining dataset, comparing them to models using simple features (BoW with logistic regression) and fine-tuned BioBERT models. RESULTS: Fine-tuning BioBERT produced the best classification (F1: 0.800-0.902) and reasoning (F1: 0.851) results. Among LLM approaches, few-shot CoT achieved the best classification (F1: 0.671-0.770) and reasoning (F1: 0.682) results, comparable to the BoW model (F1: 0.602-0.753 and 0.675 for classification and reasoning, respectively). It took 78 h to obtain the best LLM results, compared to 0.078 and 0.008 h for the top-performing BioBERT and BoW models, respectively. DISCUSSION: The simple BoW model performed similarly to the most complex LLM prompting. Prompt engineering required significant investment. CONCLUSION: Despite the excitement around viral ChatGPT, fine-tuning for two fundamental biomedical natural language processing tasks remained the best strategy. Shan Chen 0004, Yingya Li, Hoang Van, Hugo J. W. L. Aerts, Guergana K. Savova, Danielle S. Bitterman |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 5 |
| 2016 | PharmacoGx: an R package for analysis of large pharmacogenomic datasetsabstractUNLABELLED: Pharmacogenomics holds great promise for the development of biomarkers of drug response and the design of new therapeutic options, which are key challenges in precision medicine. However, such data are scattered and lack standards for efficient access and analysis, consequently preventing the realization of the full potential of pharmacogenomics. To address these issues, we implemented PharmacoGx, an easy-to-use, open source package for integrative analysis of multiple pharmacogenomic datasets. We demonstrate the utility of our package in comparing large drug sensitivity datasets, such as the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer and the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia. Moreover, we show how to use our package to easily perform Connectivity Map analysis. With increasing availability of drug-related data, our package will open new avenues of research for meta-analysis of pharmacogenomic data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PharmacoGx is implemented in R and can be easily installed on any system. The package is available from CRAN and its source code is available from GitHub. CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Petr Smirnov, Zhaleh Safikhani, Nehme Hachem, Adrian She, Catharina Olsen, Mark Freeman 0002, Heather Marie Selby, Deena M. A. Gendoo, Patrick Grossmann, Andrew H. Beck, Hugo J. W. L. Aerts, Mathieu Lupien, Anna Goldenberg, Benjamin Haibe-Kains |
Bioinform. | 12 |
| 2016 | Increasing the impact of medical image computing using community-based open-access hackathons: The NA-MIC and 3D Slicer experience
Tina Kapur, Steven D. Pieper, Andriy Fedorov, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin, Michael Halle, Lauren O'Donnell, Andras Lasso, Tamas Ungi, Csaba Pinter, Julien Finet, Sonia Pujol, Jayender Jagadeesan, Junichi Tokuda, Isaiah Norton, Raúl San José Estépar, David T. Gering, Hugo J. W. L. Aerts, Marianna Jakab, Nobuhiko Hata, Luiz Ibáñez, Daniel J. Blezek, Jim Miller, Stephen R. Aylward, W. Eric L. Grimson, Gabor Fichtinger, William M. Wells III, William E. Lorensen, William J. Schroeder, Ron Kikinis |
Medical Image Anal. | 17 |
| 2015 | diXa: a data infrastructure for chemical safety assessmentabstractMOTIVATION: The field of toxicogenomics (the application of '-omics' technologies to risk assessment of compound toxicities) has expanded in the last decade, partly driven by new legislation, aimed at reducing animal testing in chemical risk assessment but mainly as a result of a paradigm change in toxicology towards the use and integration of genome wide data. Many research groups worldwide have generated large amounts of such toxicogenomics data. However, there is no centralized repository for archiving and making these data and associated tools for their analysis easily available. RESULTS: The Data Infrastructure for Chemical Safety Assessment (diXa) is a robust and sustainable infrastructure storing toxicogenomics data. A central data warehouse is connected to a portal with links to chemical information and molecular and phenotype data. diXa is publicly available through a user-friendly web interface. New data can be readily deposited into diXa using guidelines and templates available online. Analysis descriptions and tools for interrogating the data are available via the diXa portal. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://www.dixa-fp7.eu CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Diana M. Hendrickx, Hugo J. W. L. Aerts, Florian Caiment, Dominic Clark, Timothy M. D. Ebbels, Chris T. A. Evelo, Hans Gmuender, Dennie G. A. J. Hebels, Ralf Herwig, Jürgen Hescheler, Danyel Jennen, Marlon J. A. Jetten, Stathis Kanterakis, Hector C. Keun, Vera Matser, John P. Overington, Ekaterina Pilicheva, Ugis Sarkans, Marcelo P. Segura-Lepe, Isaia Sotiriadou, Timo Wittenberger, Clemens Wittwehr, Antonella Zanzi, Jos Kleinjans |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2013 | Research and applications: Comparison and validation of genomic predictors for anticancer drug sensitivityabstractBACKGROUND: An enduring challenge in personalized medicine lies in selecting the right drug for each individual patient. While testing of drugs on patients in large trials is the only way to assess their clinical efficacy and toxicity, we dramatically lack resources to test the hundreds of drugs currently under development. Therefore the use of preclinical model systems has been intensively investigated as this approach enables response to hundreds of drugs to be tested in multiple cell lines in parallel. METHODS: Two large-scale pharmacogenomic studies recently screened multiple anticancer drugs on over 1000 cell lines. We propose to combine these datasets to build and robustly validate genomic predictors of drug response. We compared five different approaches for building predictors of increasing complexity. We assessed their performance in cross-validation and in two large validation sets, one containing the same cell lines present in the training set and another dataset composed of cell lines that have never been used during the training phase. RESULTS: Sixteen drugs were found in common between the datasets. We were able to validate multivariate predictors for three out of the 16 tested drugs, namely irinotecan, PD-0325901, and PLX4720. Moreover, we observed that response to 17-AAG, an inhibitor of Hsp90, could be efficiently predicted by the expression level of a single gene, NQO1. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that genomic predictors could be robustly validated for specific drugs. If successfully validated in patients' tumor cells, and subsequently in clinical trials, they could act as companion tests for the corresponding drugs and play an important role in personalized medicine. Simon Papillon-Cavanagh, Nicolas De Jay, Nehme Hachem, Catharina Olsen, Gianluca Bontempi, Hugo J. W. L. Aerts, John Quackenbush, Benjamin Haibe-Kains |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 6 |
| 2013 | Automated delineation of lung tumors from CT images using a single click ensemble segmentation approach
Yuhua Gu, Lawrence O. Hall, Dmitry B. Goldgof, Ching-Yen Li, René Korn, Claus Bendtsen, Emmanuel Rios Velazquez, Andre Dekker, Hugo J. W. L. Aerts, Philippe Lambin, Xiuli Li, Robert A. Gatenby, Robert J. Gillies |
Pattern Recognit. | 10 |
| 2008 | Improving physical behavior in image registrationabstractDuring the past years, many different registration methods have emerged. These usually lead to different results and one faces the problem of choosing the most appropriate. To mitigate this issue, several algorithms have been developed to include prior knowledge in order to force the registration to have a physical behavior. The use of most of these methods in daily practice is cumbersome because of the need to create data-specific meshes. This paper introduces a local convolutive filter in order to iteratively make the result of any registration method converge towards a linear elastic solution. This method was tested and validated on virtual data and on a real silicone rubber cube. Guillaume Janssens, Jonathan Orban de Xivry, Hugo J. W. L. Aerts, Geert Bosmans, Andre Dekker, Benoît Macq |
ICIP | 3 |