Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew Gelfand

dblp:03/9922 · also Andrew E. Gelfand · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 69% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 24% Coding theory · 8%
Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 70% Segmentation and scene understanding · 16% Learning theory · 14%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
linear programming relaxation
0.522018
Maximum Weight Matching Using Odd-Sized Cycles: Max-Product Belief Propagation and Half-Integrality · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
A Graphical Transformation for Belief Propagation: Maximum Weight Matchings and Odd-Sized Cycles · NIPS 2013
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph matching
maximum matching
0.522018
Maximum Weight Matching Using Odd-Sized Cycles: Max-Product Belief Propagation and Half-Integrality · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
A Graphical Transformation for Belief Propagation: Maximum Weight Matchings and Odd-Sized Cycles · NIPS 2013
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.312018
Maximum Weight Matching Using Odd-Sized Cycles: Max-Product Belief Propagation and Half-Integrality · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Mathematical optimization › integer programming
half-integrality
0.312018
Maximum Weight Matching Using Odd-Sized Cycles: Max-Product Belief Propagation and Half-Integrality · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.222011
Pushing the Power of Stochastic Greedy Ordering Schemes for Inference in Graphical Models · AAAI 2011
Stopping Rules for Randomized Greedy Triangulation Schemes · AAAI 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.212016
Geographic Segmentation via Latent Poisson Factor Model · WSDM 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › factor analysis
poisson factor analysis
0.212016
Geographic Segmentation via Latent Poisson Factor Model · WSDM 2016
Data mining › structured data mining
spatial data mining
0.212016
Geographic Segmentation via Latent Poisson Factor Model · WSDM 2016
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › iterative decoding
belief propagation
0.212013
A Graphical Transformation for Belief Propagation: Maximum Weight Matchings and Odd-Sized Cycles · NIPS 2013
Mathematical optimization › integer programming
cutting planes
0.212013
A Graphical Transformation for Belief Propagation: Maximum Weight Matchings and Odd-Sized Cycles · NIPS 2013
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
boundary-aware segmentation
0.112011
Integrating local classifiers through nonlinear dynamics on label graphs with an application to image segmentation · ICCV 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction
conditional random field
0.112011
Integrating local classifiers through nonlinear dynamics on label graphs with an application to image segmentation · ICCV 2011
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation
0.112011
Integrating local classifiers through nonlinear dynamics on label graphs with an application to image segmentation · ICCV 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic inference
0.112011
Stopping Rules for Randomized Greedy Triangulation Schemes · AAAI 2011
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
greedy algorithm
0.112011
Pushing the Power of Stochastic Greedy Ordering Schemes for Inference in Graphical Models · AAAI 2011
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.112010
On Herding and the Perceptron Cycling Theorem · NIPS 2010
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
perceptron
0.112010
On Herding and the Perceptron Cycling Theorem · NIPS 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weak supervision · 0.5poisson factor model · 0.5max-product belief propagation · 0.3linear programming relaxation · 0.3cutting-plane method · 0.3stochastic greedy ordering · 0.2iterative greedy variable ordering · 0.2graphical models · 0.2belief propagation · 0.2stopping rule · 0.1randomized greedy triangulation · 0.1pairwise boundary cues · 0.1minfill · 0.1local classifiers · 0.1chaotic dynamical system · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Maximum Weight Matching Using Odd-Sized Cycles: Max-Product Belief Propagation and Half-Integrality
abstract
We study the maximum weight matching (MWM) problem for general graphs through the max-product belief propagation (BP) and related Linear Programming (LP). The BP approach provides distributed heuristics for finding the maximum a posteriori (MAP) assignment in a joint probability distribution represented by a graphical model (GM), and respective LPs can be considered as continuous relaxations of the discrete MAP problem. It was recently shown that a BP algorithm converges to the correct MAP/MWM assignment under a simple GM formulation of MWM, as long as the corresponding LP relaxation is tight. First, under the motivation for forcing the tightness condition, we consider a new GM formulation of MWM, say C-GM, using non-intersecting odd-sized cycles in the graph; the new corresponding LP relaxation, say C-LP, becomes tight for more MWM instances. However, the tightness of C-LP now does not guarantee such convergence and correctness of the new BP on C-GM. To address the issue, we introduce a novel graph transformation applied to C-GM, which results in another GM formulation of MWM, and prove that the respective BP on it converges to the correct MAP/MWM assignment, as long as C-LP is tight. Finally, we also show that C-LP always has half-integral solutions, which leads to an efficient BP-based MWM heuristic consisting of making sequential, “cutting plane”, modifications to the underlying GM. Our experiments show that this BP-based cutting plane heuristic performs, as well as that based on traditional LP solvers.
Sungsoo Ahn, Michael Chertkov, Andrew Gelfand, Jinwoo Shin
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3
2016 Geographic Segmentation via Latent Poisson Factor Model
abstract
Discovering latent structures in spatial data is of critical importance to understanding the user behavior of location-based services. In this paper, we study the problem of geographic segmentation of spatial data, which involves dividing a collection of observations into distinct geo-spatial regions and uncovering abstract correlation structures in the data. We introduce a novel, Latent Poisson Factor (LPF) model to describe spatial count data. The model describes the spatial counts as a Poisson distribution with a mean that factors over a joint item-location latent space. The latent factors are constrained with weak labels to help uncover interesting spatial dependencies. We study the LPF model on a mobile app usage data set and a news article readership data set. We empirically demonstrate its effectiveness on a variety of prediction tasks on these two data sets.
Rose Yu, Andrew Gelfand, Suju Rajan, Cyrus Shahabi, Yan Liu 0002
WSDM2
2013 Belief Propagation for Linear Programming
abstract
Belief Propagation (BP) is a popular, distributed heuristic for performing MAP computations in Graphical Models. BP can be interpreted, from a variational perspective, as minimizing the Bethe Free Energy (BFE). BP can also be used to solve a special class of Linear Programming (LP) problems. For this class of problems, MAP inference can be stated as an integer LP with an LP relaxation that coincides with minimization of the BFE at “zero temperature”. We generalize these prior results and establish a tight characterization of the LP problems that can be formulated as an equivalent LP relaxation of MAP inference. Moreover, we suggest an efficient, iterative annealing BP algorithm for solving this broader class of LP problems. We demonstrate the algorithm's performance on a set of weighted matching problems by using it as a cutting plane method to solve a sequence of LPs tightened by adding “blossom” inequalities.
Andrew Gelfand, Jinwoo Shin, Michael Chertkov
ISIT1
2013 A Graphical Transformation for Belief Propagation: Maximum Weight Matchings and Odd-Sized Cycles
abstract
Max-product ‘belief propagation’ (BP) is a popular distributed heuristic for finding the Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) assignment in a joint probability distribution represented by a Graphical Model (GM). It was recently shown that BP converges to the correct MAP assignment for a class of loopy GMs with the following common feature: the Linear Programming (LP) relaxation to the MAP problem is tight (has no integrality gap). Unfortunately, tightness of the LP relaxation does not, in general, guarantee convergence and correctness of the BP algorithm. The failure of BP in such cases motivates reverse engineering a solution – namely, given a tight LP, can we design a ‘good’ BP algorithm. In this paper, we design a BP algorithm for the Maximum Weight Matching (MWM) problem over general graphs. We prove that the algorithm converges to the correct optimum if the respective LP relaxation, which may include inequalities associated with non-intersecting odd-sized cycles, is tight. The most significant part of our approach is the introduction of a novel graph transformation designed to force convergence of BP. Our theoretical result suggests an efficient BP-based heuristic for the MWM problem, which consists of making sequential, “cutting plane”, modifications to the underlying GM. Our experiments show that this heuristic performs as well as traditional cutting-plane algorithms using LP solvers on MWM problems.
Jinwoo Shin, Andrew Gelfand, Michael Chertkov
NIPS2
2012 Generalized Belief Propagation on Tree Robust Structured Region Graphs
Andrew Gelfand, Max Welling
UAI1
2012 A Cluster-Cumulant Expansion at the Fixed Points of Belief Propagation
Max Welling, Andrew Gelfand, Alexander Ihler
UAI2
2011 Stopping Rules for Randomized Greedy Triangulation Schemes
abstract
Many algorithms for performing inference in graphical models have complexity that is exponential in the treewidth — a parameter of the underlying graph structure. Computing the (minimal) treewidth is NPcomplete, so stochastic algorithms are sometimes used to find low width tree decompositions. A common approach for finding good decompositions is iteratively executing a greedy triangulation algorithm (e.g. minfill) with randomized tie-breaking. However, utilizing a stochastic algorithm as part of the inference task introduces a new problem — namely, deciding how long the stochastic algorithm should be allowed to execute before performing inference on the best tree decomposition found so far. We refer to this dilemma as the Stopping Problem and formalize it in terms of the total time needed to answer a probabilistic query. We propose a rule for discontinuing the search for improved decompositions and demonstrate the benefit (in terms of time saved) of applying this rule to Bayes and Markov network instances.
Andrew Gelfand, Kalev Kask, Rina Dechter
AAAI1
2011 Pushing the Power of Stochastic Greedy Ordering Schemes for Inference in Graphical Models
abstract
We study iterative randomized greedy algorithms for generating (elimination) orderings with small induced width and state space size — two parameters known to bound the complexity of inference in graphical models. We propose and implement the Iterative Greedy Variable Ordering (IGVO) algorithm, a new variant within this algorithm class. An empirical evaluation using different ranking functions and conditions of randomness, demonstrates that IGVO finds significantly better orderings than standard greedy ordering implementations when evaluated within an anytime framework. Additional order of magnitude improvements are demonstrated on a multi-core system, thus further expanding the set of solvable graphical models. The experiments also confirm the superiority of the MinFill heuristic within the iterative scheme.
Kalev Kask, Andrew Gelfand, Lars Otten, Rina Dechter
AAAI2
2011 Integrating local classifiers through nonlinear dynamics on label graphs with an application to image segmentation
abstract
We present a new method to combine possibly inconsistent locally (piecewise) trained conditional models p(yα|xα) into pseudo-samples from a global model. Our method does not require training of a CRF, but instead generates samples by iterating forward a weakly chaotic dynamical system. The new method is illustrated on image segmentation tasks where classifiers based on local appearance cues are combined with pairwise boundary cues.
Yutian Chen 0001, Andrew Gelfand, Charless C. Fowlkes, Max Welling
ICCV2
2010 On Herding and the Perceptron Cycling Theorem
abstract
The paper develops a connection between traditional perceptron algorithms and recently introduced herding algorithms. It is shown that both algorithms can be viewed as an application of the perceptron cycling theorem. This connection strengthens some herding results and suggests new (supervised) herding algorithms that, like CRFs or discriminative RBMs, make predictions by conditioning on the input attributes. We develop and investigate variants of conditional herding, and show that conditional herding leads to practical algorithms that perform better than or on par with related classifiers such as the voted perceptron and the discriminative RBM.
Andrew Gelfand, Yutian Chen 0001, Laurens van der Maaten, Max Welling
NIPS1
2010 BEEM : Bucket Elimination with External Memory
Kalev Kask, Rina Dechter, Andrew Gelfand
UAI3
2009 Performance evaluation of decentralized estimation systems with uncertain communication
Andrew Gelfand, Mike Colony, Christopher Bowman
FUSION1
2007 Introduction of the hybrid inference tool (HIT)
abstract
The construction of belief networks is a widely used methodology for high level fusion modeling. While some of the components of a belief network deal with ambiguous (probabilistic) data, others may deal with vague (possibilistic) data. Given the need to represent both probabilistic and possibilistic components in a single belief network, a framework and toolset for building Hybrid networks, utilizing Bayesian techniques to represent ambiguous data components and Fuzzy logic for vague components, is highly desired. To address this shortfall, we introduce the hybrid inference tool (HIT) to aid in the construction, compilation and performing of inference on Hybrid networks. The design of HIT includes an application programming interface (API) to support the incorporation of different transformation methods, engines and modeling packages for each component type. The applications utilized for the development, testing and validation of HIT are Norsys' Netica API (Bayesian networks) and the NRC CIIT's Fuzzy J API.
K. David Lee, Andrew Gelfand, Eric Wiesenfeld, Brian Stepnitz
FUSION2