Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Charles P. Sandbank
dblp:04/1128
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1985
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 81% Image and video coding · 19% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Multimedia systems and quality of experience
high-definition television |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | The evolution towards high-definition television · Proc. IEEE 1985 |
Image and video coding
bandwidth compression |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | The evolution towards high-definition television · Proc. IEEE 1985 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
standards compatibility analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1985 | The evolution towards high-definition televisionabstractThe paper discusses the impact on our multimedia society of the recent practice of using different TV standards for the various parts of the chain from studio to receiver. This trend to optimize the standard for each stage rather than stick to one standard throughout paves the way for the evolutionary approach to HDTV. High-definition studio sources will also have to provide signals for existing terrestrial networks as well as the newer media distribution methods such as cable, DBS, tape, and disc. The paper discusses the relationship of possible HDTV studio standards to these other channels and attempts to quantify, the magnitude of the problems of achieving compatibility and "transparency." The main question of compatibility is identified as the need to solve the problem of using the same studio source as a signal for 60- as well as 50-Hz transmissions. "Transparency" can be achieved in a compatible way by adding bandwidth to carry the higher definition. However, if sophisticated bandwidth reduction techniques using picture storage in the receiver are to be used to achieve optimum spectrum usage a new starting point of standardization for transmission is required. Charles P. Sandbank, Ian Childs |
Proc. IEEE | 1 |