Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ian van der Linde

dblp:05/3092 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-8131-5906ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video coding · 53% Visualization and visual analytics · 47%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video coding
image quality assessment
0.112012
A Comparison of the Statistical Properties of IQA Databases Relative to a Set of Newly Captured High-Definition Images · ECCV (4) 2012
Visualization and visual analytics › visual saliency
fixation prediction
0.112008
GAFFE: A Gaze-Attentive Fixation Finding Engine · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2008
Visualization and visual analytics
visual attention
0.112008
GAFFE: A Gaze-Attentive Fixation Finding Engine · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2008
Image and video coding
image quality
0.012012
A Comparison of the Statistical Properties of IQA Databases Relative to a Set of Newly Captured High-Definition Images · ECCV (4) 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

low-level feature statistics · 0.1foveated analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Profiling human vulnerability to online scams: An integrative trait-based and cross-validated predictive model
Hossein Abroshan, Ian van der Linde, Elizabeth Kirk, Mahdi Maktabdar Oghaz, Jen Muir, Sreebhadra Vallukappully
Comput. Secur.2
2020 EMIP: The eye movements in programming dataset
abstract
A large dataset that contains the eye movements of N=216 programmers of different experience levels captured during two code comprehension tasks is presented. Data are grouped in terms of programming expertise (from none to high) and other demographic descriptors. Data were collected through an international collaborative effort that involved eleven research teams across eight countries on four continents. The same eye tracking apparatus and software was used for the data collection. The Eye Movements in Programming (EMIP) dataset is freely available for download. The varied metadata in the EMIP dataset provides fertile ground for the analysis of gaze behavior and may be used to make novel insights about code comprehension.
Roman Bednarik, Teresa Busjahn, Agostino Gibaldi, Alireza Ahadi, Mária Bieliková, Martha E. Crosby, Kai Essig, Fabian Fagerholm, Ahmad Jbara, Raymond Lister, Pavel A. Orlov, James H. Paterson, Bonita Sharif, Teemu Sirkiä, Jan Stelovsky, Jozef Tvarozek, Hana Vrzakova, Ian van der Linde
Sci. Comput. Program.18
2012 A Comparison of the Statistical Properties of IQA Databases Relative to a Set of Newly Captured High-Definition Images
Javier Silvestre-Blanes, Ian van der Linde, Rubén Pérez-Lloréns
ECCV (4)2
2008 GAFFE: A Gaze-Attentive Fixation Finding Engine
abstract
The ability to automatically detect visually interesting regions in images has many practical applications, especially in the design of active machine vision and automatic visual surveillance systems. Analysis of the statistics of image features at observers' gaze can provide insights into the mechanisms of fixation selection in humans. Using a foveated analysis framework, we studied the statistics of four low-level local image features: luminance, contrast, and bandpass outputs of both luminance and contrast, and discovered that image patches around human fixations had, on average, higher values of each of these features than image patches selected at random. Contrast-bandpass showed the greatest difference between human and random fixations, followed by luminance-bandpass, RMS contrast, and luminance. Using these measurements, we present a new algorithm that selects image regions as likely candidates for fixation. These regions are shown to correlate well with fixations recorded from human observers.
Umesh Rajashekar, Ian van der Linde, Alan C. Bovik, Lawrence K. Cormack
IEEE Trans. Image Process.2
2006 Foveated Analysis and Selection of Visual Fixations in Natural Scenes
abstract
The ability to automatically detect visually interesting regions in images has practical applications in the design of active machine vision systems. Analysis of the statistics of image features at observers gaze can provide insights into the mechanisms of fixation selection in humans. Using a novel foveated analysis framework, in which features were analyzed at the spatial resolution at which they were perceived, we studied the statistics of four low-level local image features: luminance, contrast, center-surround outputs of luminance and contrast, and discovered that the image patches around human fixations had, on average, higher values of each of these features than the image patches selected at random. Center-surround contrast showed the greatest difference between human and random fixations, followed by contrast, center-surround luminance, and luminance. Using these measurements, we present a new algorithm that selects image regions as likely candidates for fixation. These regions are shown to correlate well with fixations recorded from observers.
Umesh Rajashekar, Ian van der Linde, Alan C. Bovik, Lawrence K. Cormack
ICIP2