Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tod Milam

dblp:05/3737 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Debugging and program repair · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Multi-agent systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › distributed coordination
multi-agent systems
0.012003
Demonstration: Liaison Agents for Distributed Space Operations · IJCAI 2003
Debugging and program repair › concurrent program debugging
distributed debugging
0.012002
A Suite of Tools for Debugging Distributed Autonomous Systems · ICRA 2002
Logic in computer science › temporal logic
interval temporal logic
0.012002
A Suite of Tools for Debugging Distributed Autonomous Systems · ICRA 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

runtime logging · 0.1interval logic · 0.1agent-based coordination · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 A Suite of Tools for Debugging Distributed Autonomous Systems
David Kortenkamp, Reid G. Simmons, Tod Milam, Joaquín Lopez Fernández
Formal Methods Syst. Des.3
2003 Demonstration: Liaison Agents for Distributed Space Operations
Debra Schreckenghost, R. Peter Bonasso, David Kortenkamp, Cheryl E. Martin, Tod Milam, Carroll Thronesbery
IJCAI5
2002 A Suite of Tools for Debugging Distributed Autonomous Systems
abstract
Describes a set of tools that allows a developer to instrument an autonomous control system to log data at run-time and then analyze that data to verify correct program behavior. Analysis is done using an interval logic that allows system engineers to express complex, temporal specifications to be checked against the logged data of the autonomous control program. A feature of both the logging and analysis is that they can work with distributed programs. All data is synchronized into a common database. The data logging tools and the interval logic are fully implemented. Results are given from a NASA distributed autonomous control system application.
David Kortenkamp, Reid G. Simmons, Tod Milam, Joaquín Lopez Fernández
ICRA3
2002 Supporting group interaction among humans and autonomous agents
abstract
An important aspect of interaction among groups of humans and software agents is supporting collaboration among these heterogeneous agents while they operate remotely and communicate asynchronously. We are developing an architecture that supports multiple humans interacting with multiple automated control agents in such a manner. We are evaluating this architecture with a group consisting of the crew of a space-based vehicle and the automated software agents controlling the vehicle systems. Such agent interaction is modelled as a loosely co-ordinated group because this model minimizes agent commitment to group goals and constraints while addressing a significant portion of crew and control agent group behaviours. In this paper, we give background on human interaction with space-based automation. We identify related research in multi-agent autonomous architectures and single agent human-computer interaction systems, we describe our architecture design for human-software agent groups and we identify research issues in loosely co-ordinated human-software groups.
Debra Schreckenghost, Cheryl E. Martin, R. Peter Bonasso, David Kortenkamp, Tod Milam, Carroll Thronesbery
Connect. Sci.5