Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Raymond H. Lin

dblp:05/6086 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet architecture and protocols · 50% Routing and switching · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols › ATM networks
ATM switch
0.011997
Performance and Complexity of Multicast Cross-Path ATM Switches · INFOCOM 1997
Routing and switching › switching networks
multicast switching
0.011997
Performance and Complexity of Multicast Cross-Path ATM Switches · INFOCOM 1997
Performance modeling and evaluation › network performance analysis
switch performance
0.011997
Performance and Complexity of Multicast Cross-Path ATM Switches · INFOCOM 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

queueing analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Performance and Complexity of Multicast Cross-Path ATM Switches
abstract
A newly proposed large-scale ATM switch called the cross-path switch has been shown to be capable of handling multirate traffic efficiently. We study two replication approaches to enhance the switch to support multicasting. The first approach replicates multicast cells at both the input and output stages, while the second one replicates cells at the input stage only. A feasible configuration for each scheme is considered and the effect of multicast traffic on the switch performance in terms of the throughput and cell loss probability is studied. We observed that, to achieve the same throughput and loss requirement, the second architecture may require fewer switching elements than the first one.
Raymond H. Lin, Cheuk H. Lam, Tony T. Lee
INFOCOM1