Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Nino Shervashidze

dblp:05/7057 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Graph learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph kernel
0.332011
Weisfeiler-Lehman Graph Kernels · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Fast subtree kernels on graphs · NIPS 2009
The graphlet spectrum · ICML 2009
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph isomorphism
0.222011
Weisfeiler-Lehman Graph Kernels · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Fast subtree kernels on graphs · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph factorization
0.212013
Distributed large-scale natural graph factorization · WWW 2013
Distributed systems
distributed graph processing
0.212013
Distributed large-scale natural graph factorization · WWW 2013
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph kernel
weisfeiler-lehman kernel
0.112011
Weisfeiler-Lehman Graph Kernels · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory
graph parameters
0.112009
The graphlet spectrum · ICML 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph algorithms · 0.3distributed factorization · 0.3weisfeiler-lehman test · 0.2subtree kernels · 0.2group representation theory · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Distributed large-scale natural graph factorization
abstract
Natural graphs, such as social networks, email graphs, or instant messaging patterns, have become pervasive through the internet. These graphs are massive, often containing hundreds of millions of nodes and billions of edges. While some theoretical models have been proposed to study such graphs, their analysis is still difficult due to the scale and nature of the data.
Amr Ahmed 0001, Nino Shervashidze, Shravan M. Narayanamurthy, Vanja Josifovski, Alexander J. Smola
WWW2
2011 Efficient branch-and-bound techniques for two-locus association mapping
abstract
Material and methods For a large-scale dataset of over 200,000 SNPs from about 200 individuals together with several phenotypes, published by Atwell et al. [1], we develop efficient methods to find pairs of SNPs which are strongly associated with the phenotype. As an exhaustive search of all possible combinations of interacting SNPs is often unfeasible, even when only considering pairs of interacting SNPs, the challenge is to find methods which avoid an exhaustive search but can still guarantee to find the causal pair. We propose two distinct approaches to efficiently determine the t top-scoring pairs of SNPs.
Karin Klotzbücher, Yasushi Kobayashi, Nino Shervashidze, Oliver Stegle, Bertram Müller-Myhsok, Detlef Weigel, Karsten M. Borgwardt
BMC Bioinform.3
2011 Weisfeiler-Lehman Graph Kernels
Nino Shervashidze, Pascal Schweitzer, Erik Jan van Leeuwen, Kurt Mehlhorn, Karsten M. Borgwardt
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2010 Spatio-Spectral Remote Sensing Image Classification With Graph Kernels
abstract
This letter presents a graph kernel for spatio-spectral remote sensing image classification with support vector machines (SVMs). The method considers higher order relations in the neighborhood (beyond pairwise spatial relations) to iteratively compute a kernel matrix for SVM learning. The proposed kernel is easy to compute and constitutes a powerful alternative to existing approaches. The capabilities of the method are illustrated in several multi- and hyperspectral remote sensing images acquired over both urban and agricultural areas.
Gustau Camps-Valls, Nino Shervashidze, Karsten M. Borgwardt
IEEE Geosci. Remote. Sens. Lett.2
2009 The graphlet spectrum
abstract
Current graph kernels suffer from two limitations: graph kernels based on counting particular types of subgraphs ignore the relative position of these subgraphs to each other, while graph kernels based on algebraic methods are limited to graphs without node labels. In this paper we present the graphlet spectrum, a system of graph invariants derived by means of group representation theory that capture information about the number as well as the position of labeled subgraphs in a given graph. In our experimental evaluation the graphlet spectrum outperforms state-of-the-art graph kernels.
Risi Kondor, Nino Shervashidze, Karsten M. Borgwardt
ICML2
2009 Fast subtree kernels on graphs
abstract
In this article, we propose fast subtree kernels on graphs. On graphs with n nodes and m edges and maximum degree d, these kernels comparing subtrees of height h can be computed in O(mh), whereas the classic subtree kernel by Ramon & G¨artner scales as O(n24dh). Key to this efficiency is the observation that the Weisfeiler-Lehman test of isomorphism from graph theory elegantly computes a subtree kernel as a byproduct. Our fast subtree kernels can deal with labeled graphs, scale up easily to large graphs and outperform state-of-the-art graph ker- nels on several classification benchmark datasets in terms of accuracy and runtime.
Nino Shervashidze, Karsten M. Borgwardt
NIPS1