MOTIVATION: Subtyping cancer is key to an improved and more personalized prognosis/treatment. The increasing availability of tumor related molecular data provides the opportunity to identify molecular subtypes in a data-driven way. Molecular subtypes are defined as groups of samples that have a similar molecular mechanism at the origin of the carcinogenesis. The molecular mechanisms are reflected by subtype-specific mutational and expression features. Data-driven subtyping is a complex problem as subtyping and identifying the molecular mechanisms that drive carcinogenesis are confounded problems. Many current integrative subtyping methods use global mutational and/or expression tumor profiles to group tumor samples in subtypes but do not explicitly extract the subtype-specific features. We therefore present a method that solves both tasks of subtyping and identification of subtype-specific features simultaneously. Hereto our method integrates` mutational and expression data while taking into account the clonal properties of carcinogenesis. Key to our method is a formalization of the problem as a rank matrix factorization of ranked data that approaches the subtyping problem as multi-view bi-clustering RESULTS: We introduce a novel integrative framework to identify subtypes by combining mutational and expression features. The incomparable measurement data is integrated by transformation into ranked data and subtypes are defined as multi-view bi-clusters We formalize the model using rank matrix factorization, resulting in the SRF algorithm. Experiments on simulated data and the TCGA breast cancer data demonstrate that SRF is able to capture subtle differences that existing methods may miss. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The implementation is available at: https://github.com/rankmatrixfactorisation/SRF CONTACT: [email protected], [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

BACKGROUND: With the advances in high throughput technologies, increasing amounts of cancer somatic mutation data are being generated and made available. Only a small number of (driver) mutations occur in driver genes and are responsible for carcinogenesis, while the majority of (passenger) mutations do not influence tumour biology. In this study, SomInaClust is introduced, a method that accurately identifies driver genes based on their mutation pattern across tumour samples and then classifies them into oncogenes or tumour suppressor genes respectively. RESULTS: SomInaClust starts from the observation that oncogenes mainly contain mutations that, due to positive selection, cluster at similar positions in a gene across patient samples, whereas tumour suppressor genes contain a high number of protein-truncating mutations throughout the entire gene length. The method was shown to prioritize driver genes in 9 different solid cancers. Furthermore it was found to be complementary to existing similar-purpose methods with the additional advantages that it has a higher sensitivity, also for rare mutations (occurring in less than 1% of all samples), and it accurately classifies candidate driver genes in putative oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes. Pathway enrichment analysis showed that the identified genes belong to known cancer signalling pathways, and that the distinction between oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes is biologically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: SomInaClust was shown to detect candidate driver genes based on somatic mutation patterns of inactivation and clustering and to distinguish oncogenes from tumour suppressor genes. The method could be used for the identification of new cancer genes or to filter mutation data for further data-integration purposes.

Abstract Summary: To facilitate the exploration of publicly available Zea mays expression data, we constructed a maize expression compendium, making use of an integration methodology and a consistent probe to gene mapping based on the 5b.60 sequence release of Z. mays. The compendium is made available through a web portal MAGIC that hosts a variety of analysis tools to easily browse and analyze the data. Our compendium is different from previous initiatives in combining expression values across different experiments by providing a consistent gene annotation across different platforms. Availability and implementation: http://bioinformatics.intec.ugent.be/magic/ Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

BACKGROUND: As an alternative to the frequently used "reference design" for two-channel microarrays, other designs have been proposed. These designs have been shown to be more profitable from a theoretical point of view (more replicates of the conditions of interest for the same number of arrays). However, the interpretation of the measurements is less straightforward and a reconstruction method is needed to convert the observed ratios into the genuine profile of interest (e.g. a time profile). The potential advantages of using these alternative designs thus largely depend on the success of the profile reconstruction. Therefore, we compared to what extent different linear models agree with each other in reconstructing expression ratios and corresponding time profiles from a complex design. RESULTS: On average the correlation between the estimated ratios was high, and all methods agreed with each other in predicting the same profile, especially for genes of which the expression profile showed a large variance across the different time points. Assessing the similarity in profile shape, it appears that, the more similar the underlying principles of the methods (model and input data), the more similar their results. Methods with a dye effect seemed more robust against array failure. The influence of a different normalization was not drastic and independent of the method used. CONCLUSION: Including a dye effect such as in the methods lmbr_dye, anovaFix and anovaMix compensates for residual dye related inconsistencies in the data and renders the results more robust against array failure. Including random effects requires more parameters to be estimated and is only advised when a design is used with a sufficient number of replicates. Because of this, we believe lmbr_dye, anovaFix and anovaMix are most appropriate for practical use.