Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alireza Farhangfar
dblp:06/310
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 50% Efficient and distributed learning · 25% Vision and language · 25% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Learning to segment from a few well-selected training images · ICML 2009 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › annotation-efficient segmentation
active learning for segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Learning to segment from a few well-selected training images · ICML 2009 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
image selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Learning to segment from a few well-selected training images · ICML 2009 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Learning to segment from a few well-selected training images · ICML 2009 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis
brain tumor segmentation |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Learning to segment from a few well-selected training images · ICML 2009 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Learning to segment from a few well-selected training images · ICML 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
discriminative random field · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Learning to segment from a few well-selected training imagesabstractWe address the task of actively learning a segmentation system: given a large number of unsegmented images, and access to an oracle that can segment a given image, decide which images to provide, to quickly produce a segmenter (here, a discriminative random field) that is accurate over this distribution of images. We extend the standard models for active learner to define a system for this task that first selects the image whose expected label will reduce the uncertainty of the other unlabeled images the most, and then after greedily selects, from the pool of unsegmented images, the most informative image. The results of our experiments, over two real-world datasets (segmenting brain tumors within magnetic resonance images; and segmenting the sky in real images) show that training on very few informative images (here, as few as 2) can produce a segmenter that is as good as training on the entire dataset. Alireza Farhangfar, Russell Greiner, Csaba Szepesvári |
ICML | 1 |
| 2008 | Impact of imputation of missing values on classification error for discrete data
Alireza Farhangfar, Lukasz A. Kurgan, Jennifer G. Dy |
Pattern Recognit. | 1 |
| 2007 | A Novel Framework for Imputation of Missing Values in DatabasesabstractMany of the industrial and research databases are plagued by the problem of missing values. Some evident examples include databases associated with instrument maintenance, medical applications, and surveys. One of the common ways to cope with missing values is to complete their imputation (filling in). Given the rapid growth of sizes of databases, it becomes imperative to come up with a new imputation methodology along with efficient algorithms. The main objective of this paper is to develop a unified framework supporting a host of imputation methods. In the development of this framework, we require that its usage should (on average) lead to the significant improvement of accuracy of imputation while maintaining the same asymptotic computational complexity of the individual methods. Our intent is to provide a comprehensive review of the representative imputation techniques. It is noticeable that the use of the framework in the case of a low-quality single-imputation method has resulted in the imputation accuracy that is comparable to the one achieved when dealing with some other advanced imputation techniques. We also demonstrate, both theoretically and experimentally, that the application of the proposed framework leads to a linear computational complexity and, therefore, does not affect the asymptotic complexity of the associated imputation method. Alireza Farhangfar, Lukasz A. Kurgan, Witold Pedrycz |
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A | 1 |