Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Remko Bonnema

dblp:06/408 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › statistical parsing
data-oriented parsing
0.011997
A DOP Model for Semantic Interpretation · ACL 1997
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › natural language semantics
semantic interpretation
0.011997
A DOP Model for Semantic Interpretation · ACL 1997
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic analysis
0.011997
A DOP Model for Semantic Interpretation · ACL 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 0.1stochastic grammar · 0.0corpus fragment combination · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Learning effective and engaging strategies for advice-giving human-machine dialogue
abstract
Abstract We describe a system that automatically learns effective and engaging dialogue strategies, generated from a library of dialogue content, using reinforcement learning from user feedback. Besides the more usual clarification and verification components of dialogue, this library contains various social elements like greetings, apologies, small talk, relational questions and jokes. We tested the method through an experimental dialogue system that encourages take-up of exercise and shows that the learned dialogue policy performs as well as one built by human experts for this system.
Martijn Spitters, Marco De Boni, Jakub Zavrel, Remko Bonnema
Nat. Lang. Eng.4
2007 Learning to Compose Effective Strategies from a Library of Dialogue Components
Martijn Spitters, Marco De Boni, Jakub Zavrel, Remko Bonnema
ACL4
1997 A DOP Model for Semantic Interpretation
abstract
In data-oriented language processing, an annotated language corpus is used as a stochastic grammar. The most probable analysis of a new sentence is constructed by combining fragments from the corpus in the most probable way. This approach has been successfully used for syntactic analysis, using corpora with syntactic annotations such as the Penn Tree-bank. If a corpus with semantically annotated sentences is used, the same approach can also generate the most probable semantic interpretation of an input sentence. The present paper explains this semantic interpretation method. A data-oriented semantic interpretation algorithm was tested on two semantically annotated corpora: the English ATIS corpus and the Dutch OVIS corpus. Experiments show an increase in semantic accuracy if larger corpus-fragments are taken into consideration.
Remko Bonnema, Rens Bod, Remko Scha
ACL1