Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mingxuan Li 0001
dblp:06/4211-1
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 64% Trustworthy machine learning · 28% Learning paradigms · 7% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › offline reinforcement learning
conservative value estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Automatic Reward Shaping from Confounded Offline Data · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Automatic Reward Shaping from Confounded Offline Data · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Confounding Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Causal Approach · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design › reward shaping
potential-based reward shaping |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Automatic Reward Shaping from Confounded Offline Data · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reward shaping |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Automatic Reward Shaping from Confounded Offline Data · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
causal reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Causally Aligned Curriculum Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
curriculum learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Causally Aligned Curriculum Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
algorithmic alignment |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Towards Sample Efficient Agents through Algorithmic Alignment (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › sample efficiency
sample-efficient reinforcement learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Towards Sample Efficient Agents through Algorithmic Alignment (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Towards Sample Efficient Agents through Algorithmic Alignment (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
adversarial defense |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Interpretability is a Kind of Safety: An Interpreter-based Ensemble for Adversary Defense · KDD 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Interpretability is a Kind of Safety: An Interpreter-based Ensemble for Adversary Defense · KDD 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial defense
ensemble defense |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Interpretability is a Kind of Safety: An Interpreter-based Ensemble for Adversary Defense · KDD 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Interpretability is a Kind of Safety: An Interpreter-based Ensemble for Adversary Defense · KDD 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
sensitivity analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Interpretability is a Kind of Safety: An Interpreter-based Ensemble for Adversary Defense · KDD 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
worst-case optimization · 0.9regret analysis · 0.9deep q-network · 0.9causal state value upper bound · 0.9causal inference · 0.9UCB exploration · 0.9causal graphical models · 0.8causal discovery · 0.8graph neural network · 0.5dynamic programming · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Automatic Reward Shaping from Confounded Offline DataabstractReward shaping has been demonstrated to be an effective technique for accelerating the learning process of reinforcement learning (RL) agents. While successful in empirical applications, the design of a good shaping function is less well understood in principle and thus often relies on domain expertise and manual design. To overcome this limitation, we propose a novel automated approach for designing reward functions from offline data, possibly contaminated with the unobserved confounding bias.We propose to use causal state value upper bounds calculated from offline datasets as a conservative optimistic estimation of the optimal state value, which is then used as state potentials in Potential-Based Reward Shaping (PBRS). When applying our shaping function to a model-free learner based on UCB principles, we show that it enjoys a better gap-dependent regret bound than the learner without shaping. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first gap-dependent regret bound for PBRS in model-free learning with online exploration. Simulations support the theoretical findings. Mingxuan Li 0001, Junzhe Zhang 0001, Elias Bareinboim |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | Confounding Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Causal ApproachabstractA key task in Artificial Intelligence is learning effective policies for controlling agents in unknown environments to optimize performance measures. Off-policy learning methods, like Q-learning, allow learners to make optimal decisions based on past experiences. This paper studies off-policy learning from biased data in complex and high-dimensional domains where \emph{unobserved confounding} cannot be ruled out a priori. Building on the well-celebrated Deep Q-Network (DQN), we propose a novel deep reinforcement learning algorithm robust to confounding biases in observed data. Specifically, our algorithm attempts to find a safe policy for the worst-case environment compatible with the observations. We apply our method to twelve confounded Atari games, and find that it consistently dominates the standard DQN in all games where the observed input to the behavioral and target policies mismatch and unobserved confounders exist. Mingxuan Li 0001, Junzhe Zhang 0001, Elias Bareinboim |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Causally Aligned Curriculum LearningabstractA pervasive challenge in Reinforcement Learning (RL) is the ``curse of dimensionality'' which is the exponential growth in the state-action space when optimizing a high-dimensional target task. The framework of curriculum learning trains the agent in a curriculum composed of a sequence of related and more manageable source tasks. The expectation is that when some optimal decision rules are shared across source tasks and the target task, the agent could more quickly pick up the necessary skills to behave optimally in the environment, thus accelerating the learning process.
However, this critical assumption of invariant optimal decision rules does not necessarily hold in many practical applications, specifically when the underlying environment contains unobserved confounders. This paper studies the problem of curriculum RL through causal lenses. We derive a sufficient graphical condition characterizing causally aligned source tasks, i.e., the invariance of optimal decision rules holds. We further develop an efficient algorithm to generate a causally aligned curriculum, provided with qualitative causal knowledge of the target environment. Finally, we validate our proposed methodology through experiments in confounded environments. Mingxuan Li 0001, Junzhe Zhang 0001, Elias Bareinboim |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Towards Sample Efficient Agents through Algorithmic Alignment (Student Abstract)abstractIn this work, we propose and explore Deep Graph Value Network (DeepGV) as a promising method to work around sample complexity in deep reinforcement-learning agents using a message-passing mechanism. The main idea is that the agent should be guided by structured non-neural-network algorithms like dynamic programming. According to recent advances in algorithmic alignment, neural networks with structured computation procedures can be trained efficiently. We demonstrate the potential of graph neural network in supporting sample efficient learning by showing that Deep Graph Value Network can outperform unstructured baselines by a large margin in solving Markov Decision Process (MDP). We believe this would open up a new avenue for structured agents design. See https://github.com/drmeerkat/Deep-Graph-Value-Network for the code. Mingxuan Li 0001, Michael L. Littman |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Interpretability is a Kind of Safety: An Interpreter-based Ensemble for Adversary DefenseabstractWhile having achieved great success in rich real-life applications, deep neural network (DNN) models have long been criticized for their vulnerability to adversarial attacks. Tremendous research efforts have been dedicated to mitigating the threats of adversarial attacks, but the essential trait of adversarial examples is not yet clear, and most existing methods are yet vulnerable to hybrid attacks and suffer from counterattacks. In light of this, in this paper, we first reveal a gradient-based correlation between sensitivity analysis-based DNN interpreters and the generation process of adversarial examples, which indicates the Achilles's heel of adversarial attacks and sheds light on linking together the two long-standing challenges of DNN: fragility and unexplainability. We then propose an interpreter-based ensemble framework called X-Ensemble for robust adversary defense. X-Ensemble adopts a novel detection-rectification process and features in building multiple sub-detectors and a rectifier upon various types of interpretation information toward target classifiers. Moreover, X-Ensemble employs the Random Forests (RF) model to combine sub-detectors into an ensemble detector for adversarial hybrid attacks defense. The non-differentiable property of RF further makes it a precious choice against the counterattack of adversaries. Extensive experiments under various types of state-of-the-art attacks and diverse attack scenarios demonstrate the advantages of X-Ensemble to competitive baseline methods. Jingyuan Wang 0001, Mingxuan Li 0001, Xin Lin 0005, Junjie Wu 0001, Chao Li 0001 |
KDD | 3 |