Offline policy learning from logged data is a critical paradigm for enabling effective decision-making without costly online exploration. However, its application has been largely confined to single-objective problems, a stark contrast to real-world scenarios where decision-making inherently involves navigating multiple, often conflicting, objectives. This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for Offline Multi-Objective Bandits (OffMOB), providing a principled solution to the fundamental challenge of learning Pareto-optimal policies from a static dataset. Our core contribution is a novel algorithm that uniquely integrates the pessimism principle with multi-objective optimization to safely learn from off-policy data. Crucially, our approach transcends the primary limitation of scalarization techniques, which are restricted to finding a single policy for a pre-defined preference. Instead, OffMOB directly approximates the entire Pareto front, learning a single, flexible policy model capable of generating an optimal action for any desired trade-off. To rigorously evaluate performance, we introduce the Tchebycheff sub-optimality metric and establish the first finite-sample generalization bounds for this problem class, proving that our algorithm converges to the true Pareto front under practical data coverage assumptions. Extensive experiments on complex benchmarks demonstrate that OffMOB significantly outperforms existing methods, identifying the complete set of optimal trade-offs where naive extensions fail.

Parametric multi-objective optimization (PMO) addresses the challenge of solving an infinite family of multi-objective optimization problems, where optimal solutions must adapt to varying parameters. Traditional methods require re-execution for each parameter configuration, leading to prohibitive costs when objective evaluations are computationally expensive. To address this issue, we propose Parametric Pareto Set Learning with multi-objective Bayesian Optimization (PPSL-MOBO), a novel framework that learns a unified mapping from both preferences and parameters to Pareto-optimal solutions. PPSL-MOBO leverages a hypernetwork with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to efficiently capture parametric variations, while integrating Gaussian process surrogates and hypervolume-based acquisition to minimize expensive function evaluations. We demonstrate PPSL-MOBO's effectiveness on two challenging applications: multi-objective optimization with shared components, where certain design variables must be identical across solution families due to modular constraints, and dynamic multi-objective optimization, where objectives evolve over time. Unlike existing methods that cannot directly solve PMO problems in a unified manner, PPSL-MOBO learns a single model that generalizes across the entire parameter space. By enabling instant inference of Pareto sets for new parameter values without retraining, PPSL-BO provides an efficient solution for expensive PMO problems.

Reinforcement Learning (RL) with linear transition kernels and reward functions has recently attracted growing attention due to its computational efficiency and theoretical advancements. However, prior theoretical research in RL has primarily focused on single-objective problems, resulting in limited theoretical development for multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL). To bridge this gap, we examine MORL under lexicographic reward structures, where rewards comprise $m$ hierarchically ordered objectives. In this framework, the agent the agent maximizes objectives sequentially, prioritizing the highest-priority objective before considering subsequent ones. We introduce the first MORL algorithm with provable regret guarantees. For any objective $i \in \\{1, 2, \ldots, m\\}$, our algorithm achieves a regret bound of $\widetilde{O}(\Lambda^i(\lambda) \cdot \sqrt{d^2H^4 K})$, where $\Lambda^i(\lambda) = 1 + \lambda + \cdots + \lambda^{i-1}$, $\lambda$ quantifies the trade-off between conflicting objectives, $d$ is the feature dimension, $H$ is the episode length, and $K$ is the number of episodes. Furthermore, our algorithm can be applied in the misspecified setting, where the regret bound for the $i$-th objective becomes $\widetilde{O}(\Lambda^i(\lambda)\cdot(\sqrt{d^2H^4K}+\epsilon dH^2K))$, with $\epsilon$ denoting the degree of misspecification.

Multi-objective multi-armed bandit (MOMAB) problems are crucial for complex decision-making scenarios where multiple conflicting objectives must be simultaneously optimized. However, most existing works are based on the linear assumption of the feedback rewards, which significantly constrains their applicability and efficacy in capturing the intricate dynamics of real-world environments. This paper explores a multi-objective neural bandit (MONB) framework, which integrates the universal approximators, neural networks, with the classical MOMABs. We adopt random scalarization to accommodate the special needs of a practitioner by setting an appropriate distribution on the regions of interest. Using the trade-off capabilities of upper confidence bound (UCB) and Thompson sampling (TS) strategies, we propose two novel algorithms, MONeural-UCB and MONeural-TS. Theoretical and empirical analysis demonstrate the superiority of our methods in multi-objective or multi-task bandit problems, which makes great improvement over the classical linear MOMABs.

Multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs) are prevalent in numerous real-world applications. Recently, Pareto Set Learning (PSL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for solving MOPs. PSL can produce a neural network for modeling the set of all Pareto optimal solutions. However, applying PSL to black-box objectives, particularly those exhibiting non-separability, high dimensionality, and/or other complex properties, remains very challenging. To address this issue, we propose leveraging evolution strategies (ESs), a class of specialized black-box optimization algorithms, within the PSL paradigm. Traditional ESs capture the complex dimensional dependencies less efficiently, which can significantly hinder their performance in PSL. To tackle this issue, we suggest encapsulating the dependencies within a neural network, which is then trained using a novel gradient estimation method. The proposed method, termed Neural-ES, is evaluated using a bespoke benchmark suite for black-box PSL. Experimental comparisons with other methods demonstrate the efficiency of Neural-ES, underscoring its ability to learn the Pareto sets of challenging black-box MOPs.

This paper studies a multiobjective bandit problem under lexicographic ordering, wherein the learner aims to maximize $m$ objectives, each with different levels of importance. First, we introduce the local trade-off, $\lambda_*$, which depicts the trade-off between different objectives. For the case when an upper bound of $\lambda_*$ is known, i.e., $\lambda\geq\lambda_*$, we develop an algorithm that achieves a general regret bound of $\widetilde{O}(\Lambda^i(\lambda)T^{(d_z^i+1)/(d_z^i+2)})$ for the $i$-th objective, where $i\in\{1,2,\ldots,m\}$, $\Lambda^i(\lambda)=1+\lambda+\cdots+\lambda^{i-1}$, $d_z^i$ is the zooming dimension for the $i$-th objective, and $T$ is the time horizon. Next, we provide a matching lower bound for the lexicographic Lipschitz bandit problem, proving that our algorithm is optimal in terms of $\lambda_*$ and $T$. Finally, for the case where $m=2$, we remove the dependence on the knowledge about $\lambda_*$, albeit at the cost of increasing the regret bound to $\widetilde{O}(\Lambda^i(\lambda_*)T^{(3d_z^i+4)/(3d_z^i+6)})$, which remains optimal in terms of $\lambda_*$. Compared to existing work on lexicographic multi-armed bandits, our approach improves the current regret bound of $\widetilde{O}(T^{2/3})$ and extends the number of arms to infinity. Numerical experiments confirm the effectiveness of our algorithms.

Multi-objective Stochastic Linear bandit (MOSLB) plays a critical role in the sequential decision-making paradigm, however, most existing methods focus on the Pareto dominance among different objectives without considering any priority. In this paper, we study bandit algorithms under mixed Pareto-lexicographic orders, which can reflect decision makers' preferences. We adopt the Grossone approach to deal with these orders and develop the notion of Pareto-lexicographic optimality to evaluate the learners' performance. Our work represents a first attempt to address these important and realistic orders in bandit algorithms. To design algorithms under these orders, the upper confidence bound (UCB) policy and the prior free lexicographical filter are adapted to approximate the optimal arms at each round. Moreover, the framework of the algorithms involves two stages in pursuit of the balance between exploration and exploitation. Theoretical analysis as well as numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithms.

This paper studies the multiobjective bandit problem under lexicographic ordering, wherein the learner aims to simultaneously maximize ? objectives hierarchically. The only existing algorithm for this problem considers the multi-armed bandit model, and its regret bound is O((KT)^(2/3)) under a metric called priority-based regret. However, this bound is suboptimal, as the lower bound for single objective multi-armed bandits is Omega(KlogT). Moreover, this bound becomes vacuous when the arm number K is infinite. To address these limitations, we investigate the multiobjective Lipschitz bandit model, which allows for an infinite arm set. Utilizing a newly designed multi-stage decision-making strategy, we develop an improved algorithm that achieves a general regret bound of O(T^((d_z^i+1)/(d_z^i+2))) for the i-th objective, where d_z^i is the zooming dimension for the i-th objective, with i in {1,2,...,m}. This bound matches the lower bound of the single objective Lipschitz bandit problem in terms of T, indicating that our algorithm is almost optimal. Numerical experiments confirm the effectiveness of our algorithm.

Contrastive learning has been effectively utilized to enhance the training of sequential recommendation models by leveraging informative self-supervised signals. Most existing approaches generate augmented views of the same user sequence through random augmentation and subsequently maximize their agreement in the representation space. However, these methods often neglect the rationality of the augmented samples. Due to significant uncertainty, random augmentation can disrupt the semantic information and interest evolution patterns inherent in the original user sequences. Moreover, pulling semantically inconsistent sequences closer in the representation space can render the user sequence embeddings insensitive to variations in user preferences, which contradicts the primary objective of sequential recommendation. To address these limitations, we propose the Context-aware Diffusion-based Contrastive Learning for Sequential Recommendation, named CaDiRec. The core idea is to leverage context information to generate more reasonable augmented views. Specifically, CaDiRec employs a context-aware diffusion model to generate alternative items for the given positions within a sequence. These generated items are aligned with their respective context information and can effectively replace the corresponding original items, thereby generating a positive view of the original sequence. By considering two different augmentations of the same user sequence, we can construct a pair of positive samples for contrastive learning. To ensure representation cohesion, we train the entire framework in an end-to-end manner, with shared item embeddings between the diffusion model and the recommendation model. Extensive experiments on five benchmark datasets demonstrate the advantages of our proposed method over existing baselines.

Neural Network-based active learning (NAL) is a cost-effective data selection technique that utilizes neural networks to select and train on a small subset of samples. While existing work successfully develops various effective or theory-justified NAL algorithms, the understanding of the two commonly used query criteria of NAL: uncertainty-based and diversity-based, remains in its infancy. In this work, we try to move one step forward by offering a unified explanation for the success of both query criteria-based NAL from a feature learning view. Specifically, we consider a feature-noise data model comprising easy-to-learn or hard-to-learn features disrupted by noise, and conduct analysis over 2-layer NN-based NALs in the pool-based scenario. We provably show that both uncertainty-based and diversity-based NAL are inherently amenable to one and the same principle, i.e., striving to prioritize samples that contain yet-to-be-learned features. We further prove that this shared principle is the key to their success-achieve small test error within a small labeled set. Contrastingly, the strategy-free passive learning exhibits a large test error due to the inadequate learning of yet-to-be-learned features, necessitating resort to a significantly larger label complexity for a sufficient test error reduction. Experimental results validate our findings.