Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brendan Roof
dblp:06/8885
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
commonsense knowledge base |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | ATOMIC: An Atlas of Machine Commonsense for If-Then Reasoning · AAAI 2019 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | ATOMIC: An Atlas of Machine Commonsense for If-Then Reasoning · AAAI 2019 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge structures
inferential knowledge |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | ATOMIC: An Atlas of Machine Commonsense for If-Then Reasoning · AAAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural language model · 0.4multi-task learning · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | ATOMIC: An Atlas of Machine Commonsense for If-Then ReasoningabstractWe present ATOMIC, an atlas of everyday commonsense reasoning, organized through 877k textual descriptions of inferential knowledge. Compared to existing resources that center around taxonomic knowledge, ATOMIC focuses on inferential knowledge organized as typed if-then relations with variables (e.g., “if X pays Y a compliment, then Y will likely return the compliment”). We propose nine if-then relation types to distinguish causes vs. effects, agents vs. themes, voluntary vs. involuntary events, and actions vs. mental states. By generatively training on the rich inferential knowledge described in ATOMIC, we show that neural models can acquire simple commonsense capabilities and reason about previously unseen events. Experimental results demonstrate that multitask models that incorporate the hierarchical structure of if-then relation types lead to more accurate inference compared to models trained in isolation, as measured by both automatic and human evaluation. Maarten Sap, Ronan Le Bras 0001, Emily Allaway, Chandra Bhagavatula, Nicholas Lourie, Hannah Rashkin, Brendan Roof, Noah A. Smith, Yejin Choi 0001 |
AAAI | 7 |