Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brendan Roof

dblp:06/8885 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
commonsense knowledge base
0.412019
ATOMIC: An Atlas of Machine Commonsense for If-Then Reasoning · AAAI 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.412019
ATOMIC: An Atlas of Machine Commonsense for If-Then Reasoning · AAAI 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge structures
inferential knowledge
0.412019
ATOMIC: An Atlas of Machine Commonsense for If-Then Reasoning · AAAI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural language model · 0.4multi-task learning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 ATOMIC: An Atlas of Machine Commonsense for If-Then Reasoning
abstract
We present ATOMIC, an atlas of everyday commonsense reasoning, organized through 877k textual descriptions of inferential knowledge. Compared to existing resources that center around taxonomic knowledge, ATOMIC focuses on inferential knowledge organized as typed if-then relations with variables (e.g., “if X pays Y a compliment, then Y will likely return the compliment”). We propose nine if-then relation types to distinguish causes vs. effects, agents vs. themes, voluntary vs. involuntary events, and actions vs. mental states. By generatively training on the rich inferential knowledge described in ATOMIC, we show that neural models can acquire simple commonsense capabilities and reason about previously unseen events. Experimental results demonstrate that multitask models that incorporate the hierarchical structure of if-then relation types lead to more accurate inference compared to models trained in isolation, as measured by both automatic and human evaluation.
Maarten Sap, Ronan Le Bras 0001, Emily Allaway, Chandra Bhagavatula, Nicholas Lourie, Hannah Rashkin, Brendan Roof, Noah A. Smith, Yejin Choi 0001
AAAI7