Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adilton G. Oliveira
dblp:07/1012
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure analysis › protein binding site analysis
protein interface analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | STING Contacts: a web-based application for identification and analysis of amino acid contacts within protein structure and across protein interfaces · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Defining 3D residue environment in protein structures using SCORPION and FORMIGA · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | STING Contacts: a web-based application for identification and analysis of amino acid contacts within protein structure and across protein interfaces · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein folding |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Defining 3D residue environment in protein structures using SCORPION and FORMIGA · Bioinform. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
knowledge-based force fields · 0.0atomic contact calculation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Defining 3D residue environment in protein structures using SCORPION and FORMIGAabstractSUMMARY: Two web-based applications to analyze amino acids three-dimensional (3D) local environment within protein structures-SCORPION and FORMIGA-are presented. SCORPION and FORMIGA produce a graphical presentation for simple statistical data showing the frequency of residue occurrence within a given sphere (defined here as the 3D contacts). The center of that sphere is placed at the Calpha and at the last heavy atom in the side chain of the selected amino acid. Further depth of detail is given in terms of a secondary structure to which the profiled amino acid belongs. Results obtained with those two applications are relevant for estimating the importance of the amino acid 3D local environment for protein folding and stability. Effectively, SCORPION and FORMIGA construct knowledge-based force fields. The difference between SCORPION and FORMIGA is in that the latter operates on protein interfaces, while the former only functions for a single protein chain. Both applications are implemented as stand-alone components of STING Millennium Suite. AVAILABILITY: http://sms.cbi.cnptia.embrapa.br/SMS, http://trantor.bioc.columbia.edu/SMS, http://mirrors.rcsb.org/SMS, http://www.es.embnet.org/SMS and http://www.ar.embnet.org/SMS. [options: Scorpion, Formiga] Roberto H. Higa, Adilton G. Oliveira, Luiz G. Horita, Ronald T. Miura, Marcus K. Inoue, Paula R. Kuser, Adauto L. Mancini, Michel Eduardo Beleza Yamagishi, Roberto C. Togawa, Goran Neshich |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2004 | STING Contacts: a web-based application for identification and analysis of amino acid contacts within protein structure and across protein interfacesabstractUNLABELLED: Amino acid contacts in terms of atomic interactions are essential factors to be considered in the analysis of the structure of a protein and its complexes. Consequently, molecular biologists do require specific tools for the identification and visualization of all such contacts. Graphical contacts (GC) and interface forming residue graphical contacts (IFRgc) presented here, calculate atomic contacts among amino acids based on a table of predefined pairs of the atom types and their distances, and then display them using number of different forms. The inventory of currently listed contact types by GC and IFRgc include hydrogen bonds (in nine different flavors), hydrophobic interactions, charge-charge interactions, aromatic stacking and disulfide bonds. Such extensive catalog of the interactions, representing the forces that govern protein folding, stability and binding, is the key feature of these two applications. GC and IFRgc are part of STING Millennium Suite. AVAILABILITY: http://sms.cbi.cnptia.embrapa.br/SMS, http://trantor.bioc.columbia.edu/SMS, http://mirrors.rcsb.org//SMS, http://www.es.embnet.org/SMS and http://www.ar.embnet.org/SMS (Options: Graphical Contacts and IFR Graphical Contacts). Adauto L. Mancini, Roberto H. Higa, Adilton G. Oliveira, Fabiana Dominiquini, Paula R. Kuser, Michel Eduardo Beleza Yamagishi, Roberto C. Togawa, Goran Neshich |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2003 | Working on the Problem of Sorting by Transpositions on Genome Rearrangements
Maria Emília M. T. Walter, Luiz Reginaldo A. F. Curado, Adilton G. Oliveira |
CPM | 3 |