VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ashwin Ramachandran
dblp:07/1826
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Graph learning · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Charting the Design Space of Neural Graph Representations for Subgraph Matching · ICLR 2025 Iteratively Refined Early Interaction Alignment for Subgraph Matching based Graph Retrieval · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph matching
subgraph matching |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Charting the Design Space of Neural Graph Representations for Subgraph Matching · ICLR 2025 Iteratively Refined Early Interaction Alignment for Subgraph Matching based Graph Retrieval · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Charting the Design Space of Neural Graph Representations for Subgraph Matching · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Charting the Design Space of Neural Graph Representations for Subgraph Matching · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph querying
knowledge graph question answering |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Charting the Design Space of Neural Graph Representations for Subgraph Matching · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph neural network · 1.7attention · 1.7message passing · 0.8iterative refinement · 0.8injective alignment · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Charting the Design Space of Neural Graph Representations for Subgraph MatchingabstractSubgraph matching is vital in knowledge graph (KG) question answering, molecule design, scene graph, code and circuit search, etc.
Neural methods have shown promising results for subgraph matching.
Our study of recent systems suggests refactoring them into a unified design space for graph matching networks.
Existing methods occupy only a few isolated patches in this space, which remains largely uncharted.
We undertake the first comprehensive exploration of this space, featuring such axes as attention-based vs. soft permutation-based interaction between query and corpus graphs, aligning nodes vs. edges, and the form of the final scoring network that integrates neural representations of the graphs.
Our extensive experiments reveal that judicious and hitherto-unexplored combinations of choices in this space lead to large performance benefits.
Beyond better performance, our study uncovers valuable insights and establishes general design principles for neural graph representation and interaction, which may be of wider interest. Vaibhav Raj, Indradyumna Roy, Ashwin Ramachandran, Soumen Chakrabarti, Abir De |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | Iteratively Refined Early Interaction Alignment for Subgraph Matching based Graph RetrievalabstractGraph retrieval based on subgraph isomorphism has several real-world applications such as scene graph retrieval, molecular fingerprint detection and circuit design. Roy et al. [35] proposed IsoNet, a late interaction model for subgraph matching, which first computes the node and edge embeddings of each graph independently of paired graph and then computes a trainable alignment map. Here, we present $\texttt{IsoNet++}$, an early interaction graph neural network (GNN), based on several technical innovations. First, we compute embeddings of all nodes by passing messages within and across the two input graphs, guided by an *injective alignment* between their nodes. Second, we update this alignment in a lazy fashion over multiple *rounds*. Within each round, we run a layerwise GNN from scratch, based on the current state of the alignment. After the completion of one round of GNN, we use the last-layer embeddings to update the alignments, and proceed to the next round. Third, $\texttt{IsoNet++}$ incorporates a novel notion of node-pair partner interaction. Traditional early interaction computes attention between a node and its potential partners in the other graph, the attention then controlling messages passed across graphs. We consider *node pairs* (not single nodes) as potential partners. Existence of an edge between the nodes in one graph and non-existence in the other provide vital signals for refining the alignment. Our experiments on several datasets show that the alignments get progressively refined with successive rounds,
resulting in significantly better retrieval performance than existing methods. We demonstrate that all three innovations contribute to the enhanced accuracy. Our code and datasets are publicly available at https://github.com/structlearning/isonetpp. Ashwin Ramachandran, Vaibhav Raj, Indradyumna Roy, Soumen Chakrabarti, Abir De |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2005 | Providing intelligent help across applications in dynamic user and environment contextsabstractThe problem of providing help for complex application interfaces has been a source of interest for a number of researcher efforts. As the computational power of computers increases, typical applications not only increase in functionality but also in the degree of interaction with the computational environment in which they reside. This paper describes an ongoing project to design an Intelligent Help System (IHS) that provides context-sensitivity not only through its modeling of application states but also its modeling of the interaction between applications and between an application and the environment in which it resides. Ashwin Ramachandran, Robert Michael Young |
IUI | 1 |