Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
J. M. Leaton
dblp:07/3048
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing
combinatorial testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Model-Based Testing in Practice · ICSE 1999 |
Software testing
model-based testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Model-Based Testing in Practice · ICSE 1999 |
Software testing
test generation |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Model-Based Testing in Practice · ICSE 1999 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
combinatorial test generation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | Model-Based Testing in PracticeabstractModel-based testing is a new and evolving technique for generating a suite of test cases from requirements.Testers using this approach concentrate on a data model and generation infrastructure instead of hand-crafting individual tests.Several relatively small studies have demonstrated how combinatorial test generation techniques allow testers to achieve broad coverage of the input domain with a small number of tests.We have conducted several relatively large projects in which we applied these techniques to systems with millions of lines of code.Given the complexity of testing, the modelbased testing approach was used in conjunction with test automation harnesses.Since no large empirical study has been conducted to measure efficacy of this new approach, we report on our experience with developing tools and methods in support of model-based testing.The four case studies presented here offer details and results of applying combinatorial test-generation techniques on a large scale to diverse applications.Based on the four projects, we offer our insights into what works in practice and our thoughts about obstacles to transferring this technology into testing organizations. Siddhartha R. Dalal, Ashish Jain, Nachimuthu Karunanithi, J. M. Leaton, Christopher M. Lott, Gardner C. Patton, Bruce M. Horowitz |
ICSE | 4 |
| 1998 | Model-based testing of a highly programmable systemabstractThe paradigm of model based testing shifts the focus of testing from writing individual test cases to developing a model from which a test suite can be generated automatically. We report on our experience with model based testing of a highly programmable system that implements intelligent telephony services in the US telephone network. Our approach used automatic test case generation technology to develop sets of self checking test cases based on a machine readable specification of the messages in the protocol under test. The AETG/sup TM/ software system selected a minimal number of test data tuples that covered pairwise combinations of tuple elements. We found the combinatorial approach of covering pairwise interactions between input fields to be highly effective. Our tests revealed failures that would have been difficult to detect using traditional test designs. However, transferring this technology to the testing organization was difficult. Automatic generation of cases represents a significant departure from conventional testing practice due to the large number of tests and the amount of software development involved. Siddhartha R. Dalal, Ashish Jain, Nachimuthu Karunanithi, J. M. Leaton, Christopher M. Lott |
ISSRE | 4 |