Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tara A. Estlin

dblp:07/479 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 9 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 37% Motion planning and robot control · 19% 3D vision · 18%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing
image registration
0.212016
Precision Instrument Targeting via Image Registration for the Mars 2020 Rover · IJCAI 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning and scheduling
0.122007
Increased Mars Rover Autonomy using AI Planning, Scheduling and Execution · ICRA 2007
Automated Planning for a Deep Space Communications Station · ICRA 1999
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › path planning
coverage path planning
0.112008
Spatial coverage planning for a planetary rover · ICRA 2008
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
0.112008
Spatial coverage planning for a planetary rover · ICRA 2008
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation
0.112016
Precision Instrument Targeting via Image Registration for the Mars 2020 Rover · IJCAI 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › scheduling
rover activity planning
0.112007
Increased Mars Rover Autonomy using AI Planning, Scheduling and Execution · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › field robotics
planetary rover
0.022008
Spatial coverage planning for a planetary rover · ICRA 2008
Increased Mars Rover Autonomy using AI Planning, Scheduling and Execution · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation
0.012000
Enhanced Mars Rover Navigation Techniques · ICRA 2000
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › path planning › mobile robot path planning
terrain-aware path planning
0.012000
Enhanced Mars Rover Navigation Techniques · ICRA 2000
Computer vision › 3D vision
visual localization
0.012000
Enhanced Mars Rover Navigation Techniques · ICRA 2000
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
autonomous science
0.012007
Increased Mars Rover Autonomy using AI Planning, Scheduling and Execution · ICRA 2007
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
learning for planning
0.011997
Learning to Improve both Efficiency and Quality of Planning · IJCAI 1997
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
dynamic planning
0.011999
Automated Planning for a Deep Space Communications Station · ICRA 1999
Physical-layer communications › wireless communication systems
deep-space communication
0.011999
Automated Planning for a Deep Space Communications Station · ICRA 1999
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource allocation
0.011997
A hierarchical architecture for resource allocation, plan execution, and revision for operation of a network of communications antennas · ICRA 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

image registration · 0.5onboard planning and execution · 0.1scheduling · 0.1execution · 0.1AI planning · 0.1ASPEN planning and scheduling · 0.0sensor constrained path planning · 0.0intelligent sequencing · 0.0machine learning · 0.0hierarchical architecture · 0.0execution monitoring · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Precision Instrument Targeting via Image Registration for the Mars 2020 Rover
Gary Doran, David R. Thompson 0001, Tara A. Estlin
IJCAI3
2012 AEGIS Automated Science Targeting for the MER Opportunity Rover
abstract
The Autonomous Exploration for Gathering Increased Science (AEGIS) system enables automated data collection by planetary rovers. AEGIS software was uploaded to the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) mission’s Opportunity rover in December 2009 and has successfully demonstrated automated onboard targeting based on scientist-specified objectives. Prior to AEGIS, images were transmitted from the rover to the operations team on Earth; scientists manually analyzed the images, selected geological targets for the rover’s remote-sensing instruments, and then generated a command sequence to execute the new measurements. AEGIS represents a significant paradigm shift---by using onboard data analysis techniques, the AEGIS software uses scientist input to select high-quality science targets with no human in the loop. This approach allows the rover to autonomously select and sequence targeted observations in an opportunistic fashion, which is particularly applicable for narrow field-of-view instruments (such as the MER Mini-TES spectrometer, the MER Panoramic camera, and the 2011 Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) ChemCam spectrometer). This article provides an overview of the AEGIS automated targeting capability and describes how it is currently being used onboard the MER mission Opportunity rover.
Tara A. Estlin, Benjamin J. Bornstein, Daniel M. Gaines, Robert C. Anderson, David R. Thompson 0001, Michael C. Burl, Rebecca Castaño, Michele Judd
ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol.1
2008 Spatial coverage planning for a planetary rover
abstract
We are developing onboard planning and execution technologies to support the exploration and characterization of geological features by autonomous rovers. In order to generate high quality mission plans, an autonomous rover must reason about the relative importance of the observations it can perform. In this paper we look at the scientific criteria of selecting observations that improve the quality of the area covered by samples. Our approach makes use of a priori information, if available, and allows scientists to mark sub-regions of the area with relative priorities for exploration. We use an efficient algorithm for prioritizing observations based on spatial coverage that allows the system to update observation rankings as new information is gained during execution.
Daniel M. Gaines, Tara A. Estlin, Caroline Chouinard
ICRA2
2007 Increased Mars Rover Autonomy using AI Planning, Scheduling and Execution
abstract
This paper presents technology for performing autonomous commanding of a planetary rover. Through the use of AI planning, scheduling and execution techniques, the OASIS autonomous science system provides capabilities for the automated generation of a rover activity plan based on science priorities, the handling of opportunistic science, including new science targets identified by onboard data analysis software, other dynamic decision-making such as modifying the rover activity plan in response to problems or other state and resource changes. We first describe some of the particular challenges this work has begun to address and then describe our system approach. Finally, we report on our experience testing this software with a Mars rover prototype.
Tara A. Estlin, Daniel M. Gaines, Caroline Chouinard, Rebecca Castaño, Benjamin J. Bornstein, Michele Judd, Issa A. D. Nesnas, Robert C. Anderson
ICRA1
2003 CLARAty and challenges of developing interoperable robotic software
abstract
We present an overview of the Coupled Layered Architecture for Robotic Autonomy. CLARAty develops a framework for generic and reusable robotic components that can be adapted to a number of heterogeneous robot platforms. It also provides a framework that will simplify the integration of new technologies and enable the comparison of various elements. CLARAty consists of two distinct layers: a functional layer and a decision layer. The functional layer defines the various abstractions of the system and adapts the abstract components to real or simulated devices. It provides a framework and the algorithms for low- and mid-level autonomy. The decision layer provides the system's high-level autonomy, which reasons about global resources and mission constraints. The decision layer accesses information from the functional layer at multiple levels of granularity. We also present some of the challenges in developing interoperable software for various rover platforms.
Issa A. D. Nesnas, Anne Wright, Max Bajracharya, Reid G. Simmons, Tara A. Estlin
IROS5
2001 Balancing deliberation and reaction, planning and execution for space robotic applications
abstract
Intelligent behavior for robotic agents requires a careful balance of fast reactions and deliberate consideration of long-term ramifications. The need for this balance is particularly acute in space applications, where hostile environments demand fast reactions, and remote locations dictate careful management of consumables that cannot be replenished. However, fast reactions typically require procedural representations with limited scope and handling long-term considerations in a general fashion is often computationally expensive. We describe three major areas for autonomous systems for space exploration: free-flying spacecraft, planetary rovers, and ground communications stations. In each of these broad applications areas, we identify operational considerations requiring rapid response and considerations of long-term ramifications. We describe these issues in the context of ongoing efforts to deploy autonomous systems using planning and task execution systems.
Russell Knight, Forest Fisher, Tara A. Estlin, Barbara E. Engelhardt, Steve A. Chien
IROS3
2001 Toward developing reusable software components for robotic applications
abstract
We present an overview of the CLARAty architecture which aims at developing reusable software components for robotic systems. These components are to support autonomy software which plans and schedules robot activities. CLARAty modifies the conventional 3-level robotic architecture into a 2-layered design: the functional layer and the decision layer. The former provides a representation of the system components and an implementation of their functionalities. The latter is the decision-making engine that drives the former. It globally reasons about the goals, system resources, and system state. The functional layer is composed of a set of interrelated object-oriented hierarchies consisting of active and passive objects that represent the system abstraction levels. We present an overview of the design of the functional layer. It is decomposed into a set of reusable core components and a set of extended components that adapt the reusable set to different hardware implementations. The reusable components provide interface definitions and implementations of basic functionality, provide local executive capabilities, manage local resources, and support decision layer queries.
Issa A. D. Nesnas, Richard Volpe, Tara A. Estlin, Hari Das Nayar, Richard Petras, Darren Mutz
IROS3
2001 Autonomously generating operations sequences for a Mars rover using AI-based planning
abstract
This paper discusses a proof-of-concept prototype for ground-based automatic generation of validated rover command sequences. This prototype is based on ASPEN (Automated Scheduling and Planning Environment). This Artificial Intelligence (AI) based planning and scheduling system will automatically generate a command sequence that will execute: within resource constraints and satisfy flight rules. An automated planning and scheduling system encodes rover design knowledge and uses the search and reasoning techniques to automatically generate low-level command sequences while respecting the rover operability constraints. This prototype planning system has been field-tested using the Rocky-7 rover at JPL, and will be field-tested on more complex rovers to prove its effectiveness before transferring the technology to flight operations for an upcoming NASA mission. The goal-driven commanding of planetary rovers greatly reduces the requirements for highly skilled rover engineering personnel. This in turn greatly reduces mission operations costs and permits a faster response to changes in rover states.
Rob Sherwood, Andrew Mishkin, Tara A. Estlin, Steve A. Chien, Paul Backes, Jeffrey S. Norris, Brian K. Cooper, Scott Maxwell, Gregg R. Rabideau
IROS3
2001 Hierarchical task network and operator-based planning: two complementary approaches to real-world planning
abstract
Work on generative planning systems has focused on two diverse approaches to plan construction. Hierarchical task network (HTN) planners build plans by successively refining high-level goals into lower-level activities. Operator-based planners employ means-end analysis to directly formulate plans consisting of low-level activities. While many have argued the universal dominance of a single approach, this paper presents an alternative view: that in different situations either may be most appropriate. To support this view, a number of advantages and disadvantages of these approaches are described in light of experiences in developing two real-world, fielded planning systems.
Tara A. Estlin, Steve A. Chien
J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell.1
2000 Enhanced Mars Rover Navigation Techniques
abstract
Robust navigation through rocky terrain by small mobile robots is important for maximizing science return from missions to Mars. We are addressing this problem at multiple levels through the development of intelligent sequencing, sensor constrained path planning, natural terrain visual localization, and real-time state estimation. Each of these techniques is described and their complementary aspects discussed. Experimental results are provided from implementation on our Mars rover prototype operating in realistic scenarios.
Richard Volpe, Tara A. Estlin, Sharon L. Laubach, Clark F. Olson, J. Balaram
ICRA2
1999 Automated Planning for a Deep Space Communications Station
abstract
This paper describes the application of Artificial Intelligence planning techniques to the problem of antenna track plan generation for a NASA Deep Space Communications Station. Me described system enables an antenna communications station to automatically respond to a set of tracking goals by correctly configuring the appropriate hardware and software to provide the requested communication services. To perform this task, the Automated Scheduling and Planning Environment (ASPEN) has been applied to automatically produce antenna trucking plans that are tailored to support a set of input goals. In this paper, we describe the antenna automation problem, the ASPEN planning and scheduling system, how ASPEN is used to generate antenna track plans, the results of several technology demonstrations, and future work utilizing dynamic planning technology.
Tara A. Estlin, Forest Fisher, Darren Mutz, Steve A. Chien
ICRA1
1997 A hierarchical architecture for resource allocation, plan execution, and revision for operation of a network of communications antennas
abstract
This paper describes a hierarchical scheduling, planning, control, and execution monitoring architecture for automating operations of the Deep Space Network, a worldwide network of communications antennas. We describe the network automation problem and current mode of operations. We then describe a three layer hierarchical architecture for automating network operations. In particular we describe the notion of plan/schedule generation, execution, and revision at each level. Finally, we describe the current state of deployment for each segment of the automation architecture.
Steve A. Chien, Randall W. Hill Jr., Anita Govindjee, Tara A. Estlin, M. A. Griesel, Roberto Lam, Kristina V. Fayyad
ICRA5
1997 Learning to Improve both Efficiency and Quality of Planning
Tara A. Estlin, Raymond J. Mooney
IJCAI1