Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michal Rimon

dblp:07/6040 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers
Electronic design automation · 92% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 8%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.222011
Learning microarchitectural behaviors to improve stimuli generation quality · DAC 2011
Constraint-Based Random Stimuli Generation for Hardware Verification · AAAI 2006
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
coverage-driven verification
0.112011
Learning microarchitectural behaviors to improve stimuli generation quality · DAC 2011
Electronic design automation › hardware test
test stimulus generation
0.112011
Learning microarchitectural behaviors to improve stimuli generation quality · DAC 2011
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.122005
VLIW: a case study of parallelism verification · DAC 2005
Industrial experience with test generation languages for processor verification · DAC 2004
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
processor verification
0.122005
VLIW: a case study of parallelism verification · DAC 2005
Industrial experience with test generation languages for processor verification · DAC 2004
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › instruction-level parallelism › VLIW
VLIW processor
0.112005
VLIW: a case study of parallelism verification · DAC 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

decision tree learning · 0.1constraint solving · 0.1test program generator · 0.1parallel generation technique · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Generating instruction streams using abstract CSP
abstract
One of the challenges that processor level stimuli generators are facing is the need to generate stimuli that exercise microarchitectural mechanisms deep inside the verified processor. These scenarios require specific relations between the instructions participating in them. We present a new approach for processor-level scenario generation. The approach is based on creating an abstract constraint satisfaction problem, which captures the essence of the requested scenario. The generation of stimuli is done by interleaving between progress in the solution of the abstract CSP and generation of instructions. Compared with existing solutions of scenario generation, this approach yields improved coverage and reduced generation fail rate.
Yoav Katz, Michal Rimon, Avi Ziv
DATE2
2011 Learning microarchitectural behaviors to improve stimuli generation quality
abstract
Microarchitectural information regarding various aspects of instruction execution can help processor-level stimuli generators more easily reach verification goals. While many such aspects are based on common microarchitectural concepts, their specific manifestations are highly design-specific. We propose using an automatic method for acquiring such microarchitectural knowledge and integrating it into the stimuli generator. We start by extracting microarchitectural data from simulation traces. This data is fed to a decision tree learning algorithm that produces rules for microarchitectural behavior of instructions; these rules are then integrated into the testing knowledge of the stimuli generator. This testing knowledge can provide users with the ability to better control the microarchitectural behavior of generated instructions, leading to higher quality test cases. Experimental results on the POWER7 processor showed that our proposed method can improve the microarchitectural coverage of the design.
Yoav Katz, Michal Rimon, Avi Ziv, Gai Shaked
DAC2
2010 Ontology-Based Tools in the Service of Hardware Verification
Eyal Bin, Alaa Ghanayim, Karen Holtz, Eitan Marcus, Ronny Morad, Ofer Peled, Michal Rimon, Gil Shurek, Elena Tsanko
SEKE7
2006 Constraint-Based Random Stimuli Generation for Hardware Verification
Yehuda Naveh, Michal Rimon, Itai Jaeger, Yoav Katz, Michael Vinov, Eitan Marcus, Gil Shurek
AAAI2
2005 VLIW: a case study of parallelism verification
abstract
Parallelism in processor architecture and design imposes a verification challenge as the exponential growth in the number of execution combinations becomes unwieldy. In this paper we report on the verification of a Very Large Instruction Word processor. The verification team used a sophisticated test program generator that modeled the parallel aspects as sequential constraints, and augmented the tool with manually written test templates. The system created large numbers of legal stimuli, however the quality of the tests was proved insufficient by several post silicon bugs. We analyze this experience and suggest an alternative, parallel generation technique. We show through experiments the feasibility of the new technique and its superior quality along several dimensions. We claim that the results apply to other parallel architectures and verification environments.
Allon Adir, Yaron Arbetman, Bella Dubrov, Yossi Lichtenstein, Michal Rimon, Michael Vinov, Massimo A. Calligaro, Andrew Cofler, Gabriel Duffy
DAC5
2004 Industrial experience with test generation languages for processor verification
abstract
We report on our experience with a new test generation language for processor verification. The verification of two superscalar multiprocessors is described and we show the ease of expressing complex verification tasks. The cost and benefit are demonstrated: training takes up to six months; the simulation time required for a desired level of coverage has decreased by a factor of twenty; the number of escape bugs has been reduced.
Michael L. Behm, John M. Ludden, Yossi Lichtenstein, Michal Rimon, Michael Vinov
DAC4
1994 A knowledge-based prototyping environment for construction of scientific modeling software
Richard M. Keller, Michal Rimon, Aseem Das
Autom. Softw. Eng.2