VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bob Rehder
dblp:07/6157
· DBLP profile ↗
22ranked-venue papers
8as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 20 · 7 first-author · 5 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 19 · 6 first-author · 5 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Do Large Language Models Reason Causally Like Us? Even Better?
Hanna M. Dettki, Brenden M. Lake, Charley M. Wu, Bob Rehder |
CogSci | 4 |
| 2024 | Learning Type-Based Compositional Causal Rules
Bob Rehder |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2024 | Causal Information Seeking
Brian N. Yin, Bob Rehder |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2021 | Variability in causal judgments
Ivar R. Kolvoort, Zachary Davis 0001, Leendert van Maanen, Bob Rehder |
CogSci | 4 |
| 2021 | Testing a Process Model of Causal Reasoning With Inhibitory Causal Links
Bob Rehder, Zachary Davis 0001 |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2020 | The Paradox of Time in Dynamic Causal Systems
Zachary Davis 0001, Neil Bramley, Bob Rehder |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2020 | Dynamic Control Under Changing Goals
Zachary Davis 0001, Neil Bramley, Bob Rehder, Todd M. Gureckis |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2018 | Causal Structure Learning with Continuous Variables in Continuous Time
Zachary Davis 0001, Neil Bramley, Bob Rehder |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2018 | A Causal Model Approach to Dynamic Control
Zachary Davis 0001, Neil Bramley, Bob Rehder, Todd M. Gureckis |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2017 | The Causal Sampler: A Sampling Approach to Causal Representation, Reasoning, and Learning
Zachary Davis 0001, Bob Rehder |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2016 | Beyond Markov: Accounting for Independence Violations in Causal Reasoning
Bob Rehder |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2016 | Evaluating Causal Hypotheses: The Curious Case of Correlated Cues
Bob Rehder, Zachary Davis 0001 |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2016 | Modular versus Integrated Causal Learning
Bob Rehder, Kelly M. Goedert, Ciara L. Willett, Raymond Blattner |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2014 | Decisions to intervene on causal systems are adaptively selected
Anna Coenen, Bob Rehder, Todd M. Gureckis |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2013 | How does this thing work? Evaluating computational models of intervention-based causal learning
Anna Coenen, Bob Rehder, Todd M. Gureckis |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2013 | Reasoning with Inconsistent Causal Beliefs
John V. McDonnell, Pedro Tsividis, Bob Rehder |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2011 | Reasoning with Conjunctive Causes
Bob Rehder |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2011 | A Generative Model of Causal Cycles
Bob Rehder, Jay B. Martin |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2011 | Explaining drives the discovery of real and illusory patterns
Joseph Jay Williams, Tania Lombrozo, Bob Rehder |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2001 | Causal Categorization with Bayes NetsabstractA theory of categorization is presented in which knowledge of causal relationships between category features is represented as a Bayesian network. Referred to as causal-model theory, this theory predicts that objects are classified as category members to the extent they are likely to have been produced by a categorys causal model. On this view, people have models of the world that lead them to expect a certain distribution of features in category members (e.g., correlations between feature pairs that are directly connected by causal relationships), and consider exemplars good category members when they manifest those expectations. These expectations include sensitivity to higher-order feature interactions that emerge from the asymmetries inherent in causal relationships. Research on the topic of categorization has traditionally focused on the problem of learning new categories given observations of category members. In contrast, the theory-based view of categories emphasizes the influence of the prior theoretical knowledge that learners often contribute to their representations of categories [1]. However, in contrast to models accounting for the effects of empirical observations, there have been few models developed to account for the effects of prior knowledge. The purpose of this article is to present a model of categorization referred to as causal-model theory or CMT [2, 3]. According to CMT, people 's know ledge of many categories includes not only features, but also an explicit representation of the causal mechanisms that people believe link the features of many categories. In this article I apply CMT to the problem of establishing objects category membership. In the psychological literature one standard view of categorization is that objects are placed in a category to the extent they have features that have often been observed in members of that category. For example, an object that has most of the features of birds (e.g., wings, fly, build nests in trees, etc.) and few features of other categories is thought to be a bird. This view of categorization is formalized by prototype models in which classification is a function of the similarity (i.e. , number of shared features) between a mental representation of a category prototype and a to-be-classified object. However , a well-known difficulty with prototype models is that a features contribution to category membership is independent of the presence or absence of other features. In contrast , consideration of a categorys theoretical influence which combinations of features make for knowledge acceptable category members. For example , people believe that birds have nests in trees because they can fly , and in light of this knowledge an animal that doesnt fly Bob Rehder |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1997 | Scoring the Completeness of Software Designs
Bob Rehder, Nancy Pennington, Adrienne Y. Lee |
J. Syst. Softw. | 1 |
| 1995 | Cognitive Activities and Levels of Abstraction in Procedural and Object-Oriented Design
Nancy Pennington, Adrienne Y. Lee, Bob Rehder |
Hum. Comput. Interact. | 3 |