Bob Rehder

dblp:07/6157 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
22ranked-venue papers
8as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 20 · 7 first-author · 5 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 19 · 6 first-author · 5 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Do Large Language Models Reason Causally Like Us? Even Better?
Hanna M. Dettki, Brenden M. Lake, Charley M. Wu, Bob Rehder
CogSci4
2024 Learning Type-Based Compositional Causal Rules
Bob Rehder
CogSci2
2024 Causal Information Seeking
Brian N. Yin, Bob Rehder
CogSci2
2021 Variability in causal judgments
Ivar R. Kolvoort, Zachary Davis 0001, Leendert van Maanen, Bob Rehder
CogSci4
2021 Testing a Process Model of Causal Reasoning With Inhibitory Causal Links
Bob Rehder, Zachary Davis 0001
CogSci1
2020 The Paradox of Time in Dynamic Causal Systems
Zachary Davis 0001, Neil Bramley, Bob Rehder
CogSci3
2020 Dynamic Control Under Changing Goals
Zachary Davis 0001, Neil Bramley, Bob Rehder, Todd M. Gureckis
CogSci3
2018 Causal Structure Learning with Continuous Variables in Continuous Time
Zachary Davis 0001, Neil Bramley, Bob Rehder
CogSci3
2018 A Causal Model Approach to Dynamic Control
Zachary Davis 0001, Neil Bramley, Bob Rehder, Todd M. Gureckis
CogSci3
2017 The Causal Sampler: A Sampling Approach to Causal Representation, Reasoning, and Learning
Zachary Davis 0001, Bob Rehder
CogSci2
2016 Beyond Markov: Accounting for Independence Violations in Causal Reasoning
Bob Rehder
CogSci1
2016 Evaluating Causal Hypotheses: The Curious Case of Correlated Cues
Bob Rehder, Zachary Davis 0001
CogSci1
2016 Modular versus Integrated Causal Learning
Bob Rehder, Kelly M. Goedert, Ciara L. Willett, Raymond Blattner
CogSci1
2014 Decisions to intervene on causal systems are adaptively selected
Anna Coenen, Bob Rehder, Todd M. Gureckis
CogSci2
2013 How does this thing work? Evaluating computational models of intervention-based causal learning
Anna Coenen, Bob Rehder, Todd M. Gureckis
CogSci2
2013 Reasoning with Inconsistent Causal Beliefs
John V. McDonnell, Pedro Tsividis, Bob Rehder
CogSci3
2011 Reasoning with Conjunctive Causes
Bob Rehder
CogSci1
2011 A Generative Model of Causal Cycles
Bob Rehder, Jay B. Martin
CogSci1
2011 Explaining drives the discovery of real and illusory patterns
Joseph Jay Williams, Tania Lombrozo, Bob Rehder
CogSci3
2001 Causal Categorization with Bayes Nets
abstract
A theory of categorization is presented in which knowledge of causal relationships between category features is represented as a Bayesian network. Referred to as causal-model theory, this theory predicts that objects are classified as category members to the extent they are likely to have been produced by a categorys causal model. On this view, people have models of the world that lead them to expect a certain distribution of features in category members (e.g., correlations between feature pairs that are directly connected by causal relationships), and consider exemplars good category members when they manifest those expectations. These expectations include sensitivity to higher-order feature interactions that emerge from the asymmetries inherent in causal relationships. Research on the topic of categorization has traditionally focused on the problem of learning new categories given observations of category members. In contrast, the theory-based view of categories emphasizes the influence of the prior theoretical knowledge that learners often contribute to their representations of categories [1]. However, in contrast to models accounting for the effects of empirical observations, there have been few models developed to account for the effects of prior knowledge. The purpose of this article is to present a model of categorization referred to as causal-model theory or CMT [2, 3]. According to CMT, people 's know ledge of many categories includes not only features, but also an explicit representation of the causal mechanisms that people believe link the features of many categories. In this article I apply CMT to the problem of establishing objects category membership. In the psychological literature one standard view of categorization is that objects are placed in a category to the extent they have features that have often been observed in members of that category. For example, an object that has most of the features of birds (e.g., wings, fly, build nests in trees, etc.) and few features of other categories is thought to be a bird. This view of categorization is formalized by prototype models in which classification is a function of the similarity (i.e. , number of shared features) between a mental representation of a category prototype and a to-be-classified object. However , a well-known difficulty with prototype models is that a features contribution to category membership is independent of the presence or absence of other features. In contrast , consideration of a categorys theoretical influence which combinations of features make for knowledge acceptable category members. For example , people believe that birds have nests in trees because they can fly , and in light of this knowledge an animal that doesnt fly
Bob Rehder
NIPS1
1997 Scoring the Completeness of Software Designs
Bob Rehder, Nancy Pennington, Adrienne Y. Lee
J. Syst. Softw.1
1995 Cognitive Activities and Levels of Abstraction in Procedural and Object-Oriented Design
Nancy Pennington, Adrienne Y. Lee, Bob Rehder
Hum. Comput. Interact.3