Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anatoli B. Juditsky

dblp:07/6588 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 52% Information theory · 48%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 43% Learning theory · 28% Optimization for machine learning · 28%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.632016
Structure-Blind Signal Recovery · NIPS 2016
Adaptive Recovery of Signals by Convex Optimization · COLT 2015
Accuracy Guarantees for ℓ1-Recovery · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Information theory › statistical inference
oracle inequalities
0.532016
Structure-Blind Signal Recovery · NIPS 2016
Adaptive Recovery of Signals by Convex Optimization · COLT 2015
Accuracy Guarantees for ℓ1-Recovery · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Mathematical optimization
statistical estimation
0.532016
Structure-Blind Signal Recovery · NIPS 2016
Adaptive Recovery of Signals by Convex Optimization · COLT 2015
Accuracy Guarantees for ℓ1-Recovery · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Information theory › signal processing
signal recovery
0.212016
Structure-Blind Signal Recovery · NIPS 2016
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing › sparse recovery
basis pursuit
0.112011
Accuracy Guarantees for ℓ1-Recovery · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Information theory › signal processing
compressed sensing
0.112011
Accuracy Guarantees for ℓ1-Recovery · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › norm optimization
l1 minimization
0.112011
Accuracy Guarantees for ℓ1-Recovery · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
sparse recovery
0.112011
Accuracy Guarantees for ℓ1-Recovery · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Data mining
dimensionality reduction
0.112010
Sparse non-Gaussian component analysis · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction
0.112008
A New Algorithm for Estimating the Effective Dimension-Reduction Subspace · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.112005
Generalization Error Bounds for Aggregation by Mirror Descent with Averaging · NIPS 2005
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
mirror descent
0.112005
Generalization Error Bounds for Aggregation by Mirror Descent with Averaging · NIPS 2005
Data mining
high-dimensional data analysis
0.012010
Sparse non-Gaussian component analysis · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

convex optimization · 0.5linear estimators · 0.2oracle inequalities · 0.2non-euclidean basis pursuit · 0.1lasso · 0.1dantzig selector · 0.1convex projection · 0.1PCA-based subspace identification · 0.1mirror descent · 0.1averaging · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Stochastic Mirror Descent for Large-Scale Sparse Recovery
abstract
We discuss an application of Stochastic Approximation to statistical estimation of high-dimensional sparse parameters. The proposed solution reduces to resolving a penalized stochastic optimization problem on each stage of a multistage algorithm; each problem being solved to a prescribed accuracy by the non-Euclidean Composite Stochastic Mirror Descent (CSMD) algorithm. Assuming that the problem objective is smooth and quadratically minorated and stochastic perturbations are sub-Gaussian, our analysis prescribes the method parameters which ensure fast convergence of the estimation error (the radius of a confidence ball of a given norm around the approximate solution). This convergence is linear during the first “preliminary” phase of the routine and is sublinear during the second “asymptotic” phase. We consider an application of the proposed approach to sparse Generalized Linear Regression problem. In this setting, we show that the proposed algorithm attains the optimal convergence of the estimation error under weak assumptions on the regressor distribution. We also present a numerical study illustrating the performance of the algorithm on high-dimensional simulation data.
Sasila Ilandarideva, Yannis Bekri, Anatoli B. Juditsky, Vianney Perchet
AISTATS3
2016 Structure-Blind Signal Recovery
abstract
We consider the problem of recovering a signal observed in Gaussian noise. If the set of signals is convex and compact, and can be specified beforehand, one can use classical linear estimators that achieve a risk within a constant factor of the minimax risk. However, when the set is unspecified, designing an estimator that is blind to the hidden structure of the signal remains a challenging problem. We propose a new family of estimators to recover signals observed in Gaussian noise. Instead of specifying the set where the signal lives, we assume the existence of a well-performing linear estimator. Proposed estimators enjoy exact oracle inequalities and can be efficiently computed through convex optimization. We present several numerical illustrations that show the potential of the approach.
Dmitry Ostrovsky, Zaïd Harchaoui, Anatoli B. Juditsky, Arkadi Nemirovski
NIPS3
2015 Adaptive Recovery of Signals by Convex Optimization
abstract
We present a theoretical framework for adaptive estimation and prediction of signals of unknown structure in the presence of noise. The framework allows to address two intertwined challenges: (i) designing optimal statistical estimators; (ii) designing efficient numerical algorithms. In particular, we establish oracle inequalities for the performance of adaptive procedures, which rely upon convex optimization and thus can be efficiently implemented. As an application of the proposed approach, we consider denoising of harmonic oscillations.
Zaïd Harchaoui, Anatoli B. Juditsky, Arkadi Nemirovski, Dmitry Ostrovsky
COLT2
2013 Sparse non Gaussian component analysis by semidefinite programming
Elmar Diederichs, Anatoli B. Juditsky, Arkadi Nemirovski, Vladimir G. Spokoiny
Mach. Learn.2
2011 Accuracy Guarantees for ℓ1-Recovery
abstract
We discuss two new methods of recovery of sparse signals from noisy observation based onℓ1-minimization. While they are closely related to the well-known techniques such as Lasso and Dantzig Selector, these estimators come with efficiently verifiable guaranties of performance. By optimizing these bounds with respect to the method parameters we are able to construct the estimators which possess better statistical properties than the commonly used ones. We link our performance estimations to the well known results of Compressive Sensing and justify our proposed approach with an oracle inequality which links the properties of the recovery algorithms and the best estimation performance when the signal support is known. We also show how the estimates can be computed using the Non-Euclidean Basis Pursuit algorithm.
Anatoli B. Juditsky, Arkadi Nemirovski
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2010 Sparse non-Gaussian component analysis
abstract
Non-Gaussian component analysis (NGCA) introduced in offered a method for high-dimensional data analysis allowing for identifying a low-dimensional non-Gaussian component of the whole distribution in an iterative and structure adaptive way. An important step of the NGCA procedure is identification of the non-Gaussian subspace using principle component analysis (PCA) method. This article proposes a new approach to NGCA called sparse NGCA which replaces the PCA-based procedure with a new the algorithm we refer to as convex projection.
Elmar Diederichs, Anatoli B. Juditsky, Vladimir G. Spokoiny, Christof Schütte
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2008 A New Algorithm for Estimating the Effective Dimension-Reduction Subspace
Arnak S. Dalalyan, Anatoli B. Juditsky, Vladimir G. Spokoiny
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2005 Generalization Error Bounds for Aggregation by Mirror Descent with Averaging
abstract
We consider the problem of constructing an aggregated estimator from a finite class of base functions which approximately minimizes a con- vex risk functional under the ℓ1 constraint. For this purpose, we propose a stochastic procedure, the mirror descent, which performs gradient de- scent in the dual space. The generated estimates are additionally aver- aged in a recursive fashion with specific weights. Mirror descent algo- rithms have been developed in different contexts and they are known to be particularly efficient in high dimensional problems. Moreover their implementation is adapted to the online setting. The main result of the paper is the upper bound on the convergence rate for the generalization error.
Anatoli B. Juditsky, Alexander V. Nazin, Alexandre B. Tsybakov, Nicolas Vayatis
NIPS1
1999 Introduction to Special Issue on Mutliscale Statistical Signal Analysis and Its Application
Hamid Krim, Walter Willinger, Anatoli B. Juditsky, David Tse
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3
1998 An algorithm for tracking a random walk with unknown drift
abstract
We study the problem of tracking a random walk observed with noise when the variance of the walk increment is unknown. We describe a sequence of estimators of the random walk and we design an algorithm to choose the best estimator among all the sequence. We give also a bound for the mean square error of this estimator. Finally some simulations are presented and we compare our algorithm with the Kalman filter when the variance of the walk increment is estimated.
Jean Luc Le Calvez, Bernard Delyon, Anatoli B. Juditsky
ICASSP3
1995 Determination of singular points in 2D deformable flow fields
abstract
Digital image analysis appears to be more and more relevant to the study of physical phenomena involving fluid motion, and of their evolution over time. In that context, 2D deformable motion analysis is one of the important issues to be investigated. The interpretation of such deformable 2D flow fields can generally be stated as the characterization of linear models provided that first order approximations are considered in an adequate neighborhood of so-called singular points, where the velocity becomes null. This paper describes an efficient method, based on a statistical approach, which explicitly addresses these problems, and allows us to locate, characterize and track such singular points in an image sequence. It does not require the prior computation of the velocity field. The method has been validated by experiments carried out with synthetic and real examples corresponding to meteorological image sequences. In fact, the described approach can be of interest in different applications dealing with the characterization of vector fields.
Mariette Maurizot, Patrick Bouthemy, Bernard Delyon, Anatoli B. Juditsky, Jean-Marc Odobez
ICIP (3)4
1995 Accuracy analysis for wavelet approximations
abstract
"Constructive wavelet networks" are investigated as a universal tool for function approximation. The parameters of such networks are obtained via some "direct" Monte Carlo procedures. Approximation bounds are given. Typically, it is shown that such networks with one layer of "wavelons" achieve an L(2) error of order O(N(-(rho/d))), where N is the number of nodes, d is the problem dimension and rho is the number of summable derivatives of the approximated function. An algorithm is also proposed to estimate this approximation based on noisy input-output data observed from the function under consideration. Unlike neural network training, this estimation procedure does not rely on stochastic gradient type techniques such as the celebrated "backpropagation" and it completely avoids the problem of poor convergence or undesirable local minima.
Bernard Delyon, Anatoli B. Juditsky, Albert Benveniste
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks2