Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yajuan Duan

dblp:07/9282 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 75% Question answering and dialogue systems · 25%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
answer extraction
0.212013
Answer Extraction from Passage Graph for Question Answering · IJCAI 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
social media text analysis
0.212013
The Automated Acquisition of Suggestions from Tweets · AAAI 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text classification › social media text classification
tweet classification
0.212013
The Automated Acquisition of Suggestions from Tweets · AAAI 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph-based answer extraction · 0.2factorization machines · 0.2cost-sensitive learning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 The Automated Acquisition of Suggestions from Tweets
abstract
This paper targets at automatically detecting and classifying user's suggestions from tweets. The short and informal nature of tweets, along with the imbalanced characteristics of suggestion tweets, makes the task extremely challenging. To this end, we develop a classification framework on Factorization Machines, which is effective and efficient especially in classification tasks with feature sparsity settings. Moreover, we tackle the imbalance problem by introducing cost-sensitive learning techniques in Factorization Machines. Extensively experimental studies on a manually annotated real-life data set show that the proposed approach significantly improves the baseline approach, and yields the precision of 71.06% and recall of 67.86%. We also investigate the reason why Factorization Machines perform better. Finally, we introduce the first manually annotated dataset for suggestion classification.
Li Dong 0004, Furu Wei, Yajuan Duan, Ming Zhou 0001, Ke Xu 0001
AAAI3
2013 Answer Extraction from Passage Graph for Question Answering
Nan Duan 0001, Yajuan Duan, Ming Zhou 0001
IJCAI3
2012 Graph-based collective classification for tweets
abstract
In this paper, we address the problem of classifying tweets into topical categories. Because of the short, noisy and ambiguous nature of tweets, we propose to collectively conduct the classification by exploiting the context information (i.e. related tweets) other than individually as in conventional text classification methods. In particular, we augment the content-based representation of text with tweets sharing same #hashtag or URL, which results in a tweet graph. We then formulate the tweet classification task under a graph optimization framework. We investigate three popular approaches, namely, Loopy Belief Propagation (LBP), Relaxation Labeling (RL), and Iterative Classification Algorithm (ICA). Extensive experiment results show that the graph-based tweet classification approach remarkably improves the performance, while the ICA model with relationship of sharing the same #hashtag gives the best result on separate tweet graph.
Yajuan Duan, Furu Wei, Ming Zhou 0001, Harry Shum
CIKM1
2012 Twitter Topic Summarization by Ranking Tweets using Social Influence and Content Quality
Yajuan Duan, Furu Wei, Ming Zhou 0001, Harry Shum
COLING1
2010 An Empirical Study on Learning to Rank of Tweets
Yajuan Duan, Long Jiang, Tao Qin 0001, Ming Zhou 0001, Harry Shum
COLING1