VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Hewlett
dblp:08/1024
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-2306-0957ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Graph learning · 45% Question answering and dialogue systems · 30% Reinforcement learning · 10% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Recommender systems · 78% Knowledge graphs · 22% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
heterogeneous graph learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LinkSAGE: Optimizing Job Matching Using Graph Neural Networks · KDD (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph representation learning › inductive representation learning
inductive graph learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LinkSAGE: Optimizing Job Matching Using Graph Neural Networks · KDD (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
machine reading comprehension |
0.9 | 3 | 2018 | Byte-Level Machine Reading Across Morphologically Varied Languages · AAAI 2018 Accurate Supervised and Semi-Supervised Machine Reading for Long Documents · EMNLP 2017 WikiReading: A Novel Large-scale Language Understanding Task over Wikipedia · ACL (1) 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
document question answering |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Coarse-to-Fine Question Answering for Long Documents · ACL (1) 2017 |
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph querying
knowledge graph question answering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | WikiReading: A Novel Large-scale Language Understanding Task over Wikipedia · ACL (1) 2016 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
autonomous exploration |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Blending Autonomous Exploration and Apprenticeship Learning · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Blending Autonomous Exploration and Apprenticeship Learning · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Blending Autonomous Exploration and Apprenticeship Learning · NIPS 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
morphologically rich languages |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Byte-Level Machine Reading Across Morphologically Varied Languages · AAAI 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
multilingual NLP |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Byte-Level Machine Reading Across Morphologically Varied Languages · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
hierarchical neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Accurate Supervised and Semi-Supervised Machine Reading for Long Documents · EMNLP 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transfer learning · 1.7graph neural network · 1.7encoder-decoder · 1.7transformer · 0.3seq2seq · 0.3sequence autoencoder · 0.3semi-supervised learning · 0.3RNN · 0.3mistake-bound model · 0.1KWIK learning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | LinkSAGE: Optimizing Job Matching Using Graph Neural NetworksabstractWe present LinkSAGE, an innovative framework that integrates Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) into large-scale personalized job matching systems, designed to address the complex dynamics of LinkedIn's extensive professional network. Our approach capitalizes on a novel job marketplace graph, the largest and most intricate of its kind in industry, with billions of nodes and edges. This graph is not merely extensive but also richly detailed, encompassing member and job nodes along with key attributes, thus creating an expansive and interwoven network. A key innovation in LinkSAGE is its training and serving methodology, which effectively combines inductive graph learning on a heterogeneous, evolving graph with an encoder-decoder GNN model. This methodology decouples the training of the GNN model from that of existing Deep Neural Network (DNN) models, eliminating the need for frequent GNN retraining while maintaining up-to-date graph signals in near real-time, allowing for the effective integration of GNN insights through transfer learning. The subsequent nearline inference system serves the GNN encoder within a real-world setting, significantly reducing online latency and obviating the need for costly real-time GNN infrastructure. Validated across multiple online A/B tests in diverse product scenarios, LinkSAGE demonstrates marked improvements in member engagement, relevance matching, and member retention, confirming its generalizability and practical impact. Ping Liu 0002, Haichao Wei, Xiaochen Hou, Jianqiang Shen, Shihai He, Qianqi Shen, Zhujun Chen, Fedor Borisyuk, Daniel Hewlett, Liang Wu 0006, Srikant Veeraraghavan, Alex Tsun, Chengming Jiang 0001 |
KDD (1) | 9 |
| 2018 | Byte-Level Machine Reading Across Morphologically Varied LanguagesabstractThe machine reading task, where a computer reads a document and answers questions about it, is important in artificial intelligence research. Recently, many models have been proposed to address it. Word-level models, which have words as units of input and output, have proven to yield state-of-the-art results when evaluated on English datasets. However, in morphologically richer languages, many more unique words exist than in English due to highly productive prefix and suffix mechanisms. This may set back word-level models, since vocabulary sizes too big to allow for efficient computing may have to be employed. Multiple alternative input granularities have been proposed to avoid large input vocabularies, such as morphemes, character n-grams, and bytes. Bytes are advantageous as they provide a universal encoding format across languages, and allow for a small vocabulary size, which, moreover, is identical for every input language. In this work, we investigate whether bytes are suitable as input units across morphologically varied languages. To test this, we introduce two large-scale machine reading datasets in morphologically rich languages, Turkish and Russian. We implement 4 byte-level models, representing the major types of machine reading models and introduce a new seq2seq variant, called encoder-transformer-decoder. We show that, for all languages considered, there are models reading bytes outperforming the current state-of-the-art word-level baseline. Moreover, the newly introduced encoder-transformer-decoder performs best on the morphologically most involved dataset, Turkish. The large-scale Turkish and Russian machine reading datasets are released to public. Tom Kenter, Llion Jones, Daniel Hewlett |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2017 | Coarse-to-Fine Question Answering for Long DocumentsabstractEunsol Choi, Daniel Hewlett, Jakob Uszkoreit, Illia Polosukhin, Alexandre Lacoste, Jonathan Berant. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2017. Eunsol Choi, Daniel Hewlett, Jakob Uszkoreit, Illia Polosukhin, Alexandre Lacoste, Jonathan Berant |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2017 | Accurate Supervised and Semi-Supervised Machine Reading for Long DocumentsabstractWe introduce a hierarchical architecture for machine reading capable of extracting precise information from long documents.The model divides the document into small, overlapping windows and encodes all windows in parallel with an RNN.It then attends over these window encodings, reducing them to a single encoding, which is decoded into an answer using a sequence decoder.This hierarchical approach allows the model to scale to longer documents without increasing the number of sequential steps.In a supervised setting, our model achieves state of the art accuracy of 76.8 on the WikiReading dataset.We also evaluate the model in a semi-supervised setting by downsampling the WikiReading training set to create increasingly smaller amounts of supervision, while leaving the full unlabeled document corpus to train a sequence autoencoder on document windows.We evaluate models that can reuse autoencoder states and outputs without finetuning their weights, allowing for more efficient training and inference. Izzeddin Gur, Daniel Hewlett, Alexandre Lacoste, Llion Jones |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2016 | WikiReading: A Novel Large-scale Language Understanding Task over WikipediaabstractDaniel Hewlett, Alexandre Lacoste, Llion Jones, Illia Polosukhin, Andrew Fandrianto, Jay Han, Matthew Kelcey, David Berthelot. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2016. Daniel Hewlett, Alexandre Lacoste, Llion Jones, Illia Polosukhin, Andrew Fandrianto, Jay Han, Matthew Kelcey, David Berthelot |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2011 | Word Segmentation as General Chunking
Daniel Hewlett, Paul R. Cohen |
CoNLL | 1 |
| 2011 | Blending Autonomous Exploration and Apprenticeship LearningabstractWe present theoretical and empirical results for a framework that combines the benefits of apprenticeship and autonomous reinforcement learning. Our approach modifies an existing apprenticeship learning framework that relies on teacher demonstrations and does not necessarily explore the environment. The first change is replacing previously used Mistake Bound model learners with a recently proposed framework that melds the KWIK and Mistake Bound supervised learning protocols. The second change is introducing a communication of expected utility from the student to the teacher. The resulting system only uses teacher traces when the agent needs to learn concepts it cannot efficiently learn on its own. Thomas J. Walsh 0001, Daniel Hewlett, Clayton T. Morrison |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2009 | Bootstrap Voting Experts
Daniel Hewlett, Paul R. Cohen |
IJCAI | 1 |