Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew D. Macdonald

dblp:08/1593 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 50% Compilers and program optimization · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems › logic programming
constraint logic programming
0.011998
Optimizing Compilation of CLP(R) · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 1998
Compilers and program optimization
optimizing compiler
0.011998
Optimizing Compilation of CLP(R) · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

program optimization · 0.0constraint solving · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Optimizing Compilation of CLP(R)
abstract
Constraint Logic Programming (CLP) languages extend logic programming by allowing the use of constraints from different domains such as real numbers or Boolean functions. They have proved to be ideal for expressing problems that require interactive mathematical modeling and complex combinatorial optimization problems. However, CLP languages have mainly been considered as research systems, useful for rapid prototyping, by not really competitive with more conventional programming languages where efficiency is a more important consideration. One promising approach to improving the performance of CLP systems is the use of powerful program optimizations to reduce the cost of constraint solving. We extend work in this area by describing a new optimizing compiler for the CLP language CLP(ℛ). The compiler implements six powerful optimizations: reordering of constraints, removal of redundant variables, and specialization of constraints which cannot fail. Each program optimization is designed to remove the overhead of constraint solving when possible and keep the number of constraints in the store as small as possible. We systematically evaluate the effectiveness of each optimization in isolation and in combination. Our empirical evaluation of the compiler verifies that optimizing compilation can be made efficient enough to allow compilation of real-world programs and that it is worth performing such compilation because it gives significant time and space performance improvements.
Andrew D. Kelly, Kim Marriott, Andrew D. Macdonald, Peter J. Stuckey, Roland H. C. Yap
ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst.3
1995 An Optimizing Compiler for CLP(R)
Andrew D. Kelly, Andrew D. Macdonald, Kim Marriott, Harald Søndergaard, Peter J. Stuckey, Roland H. C. Yap
CP2