Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shi Pu 0004

dblp:08/2753-4 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-5813-527XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 73% Distributed computing theory · 27%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › distributed optimization
decentralized optimization
0.812024
B-ary Tree Push-Pull Method is Provably Efficient for Distributed Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2024
Distributed systems
distributed machine learning
0.812024
B-ary Tree Push-Pull Method is Provably Efficient for Distributed Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2024
Distributed computing theory › information dissemination
push-pull protocol
0.812024
B-ary Tree Push-Pull Method is Provably Efficient for Distributed Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic gradient methods
stochastic gradient descent
0.812024
B-ary Tree Push-Pull Method is Provably Efficient for Distributed Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
decentralized optimization
0.412020
A General Framework for Decentralized Optimization With First-Order Methods · Proc. IEEE 2020
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
first-order methods
0.412020
A General Framework for Decentralized Optimization With First-Order Methods · Proc. IEEE 2020
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic first-order methods
0.412020
A General Framework for Decentralized Optimization With First-Order Methods · Proc. IEEE 2020
Distributed systems › communication optimization
communication-efficient distributed computing
0.212024
B-ary Tree Push-Pull Method is Provably Efficient for Distributed Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2024
Distributed systems
consensus
0.112020
A General Framework for Decentralized Optimization With First-Order Methods · Proc. IEEE 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic gradient · 1.5push-pull · 1.5b-ary spanning tree · 1.5variance reduction · 0.9gradient tracking · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 B-ary Tree Push-Pull Method is Provably Efficient for Distributed Learning on Heterogeneous Data
abstract
This paper considers the distributed learning problem where a group of agents cooperatively minimizes the summation of their local cost functions based on peer-to-peer communication. Particularly, we propose a highly efficient algorithm, termed ``B-ary Tree Push-Pull'' (BTPP), that employs two B-ary spanning trees for distributing the information related to the parameters and stochastic gradients across the network. The simple method is efficient in communication since each agent interacts with at most $(B+1)$ neighbors per iteration. More importantly, BTPP achieves linear speedup for smooth nonconvex objective functions with only $\tilde{O}(n)$ transient iterations, significantly outperforming the state-of-the-art results to the best of our knowledge.
Runze You, Shi Pu 0004
NeurIPS2
2020 A General Framework for Decentralized Optimization With First-Order Methods
abstract
Decentralized optimization to minimize a finite sum of functions, distributed over a network of nodes, has been a significant area within control and signal-processing research due to its natural relevance to optimal control and signal estimation problems. More recently, the emergence of sophisticated computing and large-scale data science needs have led to a resurgence of activity in this area. In this article, we discuss decentralized first-order gradient methods, which have found tremendous success in control, signal processing, and machine learning problems, where such methods, due to their simplicity, serve as the first method of choice for many complex inference and training tasks. In particular, we provide a general framework of decentralized first-order methods that is applicable to directed and undirected communication networks alike and show that much of the existing work on optimization and consensus can be related explicitly to this framework. We further extend the discussion to decentralized stochastic first-order methods that rely on stochastic gradients at each node and describe how local variance reduction schemes, previously shown to have promise in the centralized settings, are able to improve the performance of decentralized methods when combined with what is known as gradient tracking. We motivate and demonstrate the effectiveness of the corresponding methods in the context of machine learning and signal-processing problems that arise in decentralized environments.
Ran Xin, Shi Pu 0004, Angelia Nedic, Usman A. Khan
Proc. IEEE2