Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vijay Vasudevan
dblp:08/2793
· DBLP profile ↗
22ranked-venue papers
6as first author
4since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 9 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 5 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
14 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 23% Autonomous driving · 19% 3D vision · 18% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
5 papers |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 50% Distributed systems · 18% Storage systems · 16% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 45, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
1.4 | 4 | 2019 | Searching for MobileNetV3 · ICCV 2019 MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobile · CVPR 2019 Understanding and Simplifying One-Shot Architecture Search · ICML 2018 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection |
1.4 | 3 | 2021 | To the Point: Efficient 3D Object Detection in the Range Image With Graph Convolution Kernels · CVPR 2021 Improving 3D Object Detection Through Progressive Population Based Augmentation · ECCV (21) 2020 Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Dataset · CVPR 2020 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
trajectory prediction |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Scene Transformer: A unified architecture for predicting future trajectories of multiple agents · ICLR 2022 Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Dataset · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.9 | 2 | 2022 | When does dough become a bagel? Analyzing the remaining mistakes on ImageNet · NeurIPS 2022 Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognition · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Improving 3D Object Detection Through Progressive Population Based Augmentation · ECCV (21) 2020 AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Strategies From Data · CVPR 2019 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › trajectory prediction
multi-agent trajectory prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Scene Transformer: A unified architecture for predicting future trajectories of multiple agents · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-label classification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | When does dough become a bagel? Analyzing the remaining mistakes on ImageNet · NeurIPS 2022 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › trajectory prediction
interactive trajectory prediction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Dataset · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
2d object detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Dataset · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
multi-object tracking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Dataset · CVPR 2020 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Dataset · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection
point cloud object detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Streaming Object Detection for 3-D Point Clouds · ECCV (18) 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data augmentation
automated augmentation policy search |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Strategies From Data · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
mobile image classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Searching for MobileNetV3 · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Searching for MobileNetV3 · ICCV 2019 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Searching for MobileNetV3 · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning › neural architecture search
one-shot neural architecture search |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Understanding and Simplifying One-Shot Architecture Search · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter sharing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Understanding and Simplifying One-Shot Architecture Search · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning › neural architecture search
transferable architecture search |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognition · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learned optimizer |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Neural Optimizer Search with Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Neural Optimizer Search with Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2017 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit · ISCA 2017 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator › inference accelerator
neural network inference accelerator |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit · ISCA 2017 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › tensor accelerator
tensor processing unit |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit · ISCA 2017 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
large-scale learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale Machine Learning · OSDI 2016 |
Distributed systems
large-scale machine learning systems |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale Machine Learning · OSDI 2016 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object annotation
3d bounding box annotation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Dataset · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolution |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | To the Point: Efficient 3D Object Detection in the Range Image With Graph Convolution Kernels · CVPR 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Dataset · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobile · CVPR 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 0.7transformer architecture · 0.6manual error categorization · 0.6transformer · 0.5pointnet · 0.5graph convolution kernels · 0.5edge convolution · 0.5cross-modality fusion · 0.5baseline prediction models · 0.5auto-labeling · 0.5data flow graph · 0.2log-structured storage · 0.1consistent hashing · 0.1measurement · 0.1analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Scene Transformer: A unified architecture for predicting future trajectories of multiple agents
Jiquan Ngiam, Vijay Vasudevan, Benjamin Caine, Hao-Tien Chiang, Jeffrey Ling, Rebecca Roelofs, Alex Bewley, Chenxi Liu 0001, Ashish Venugopal, David J. Weiss, Benjamin Sapp, Jonathon Shlens |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | When does dough become a bagel? Analyzing the remaining mistakes on ImageNetabstractImage classification accuracy on the ImageNet dataset has been a barometer for progress in computer vision over the last decade. Several recent papers have questioned the degree to which the benchmark remains useful to the community, yet innovations continue to contribute gains to performance, with today's largest models achieving 90%+ top-1 accuracy. To help contextualize progress on ImageNet and provide a more meaningful evaluation for today's state-of-the-art models, we manually review and categorize every remaining mistake that a few top models make in order to provide insight into the long-tail of errors on one of the most benchmarked datasets in computer vision. We focus on the multi-label subset evaluation of ImageNet, where today's best models achieve upwards of 97% top-1 accuracy. Our analysis reveals that nearly half of the supposed mistakes are not mistakes at all, and we uncover new valid multi-labels, demonstrating that, without careful review, we are significantly underestimating the performance of these models. On the other hand, we also find that today's best models still make a significant number of mistakes (40%) that are obviously wrong to human reviewers. To calibrate future progress on ImageNet, we provide an updated multi-label evaluation set, and we curate ImageNet-Major: a 68-example "major error" slice of the obvious mistakes made by today's top models -- a slice where models should achieve near perfection, but today are far from doing so. Vijay Vasudevan, Benjamin Caine, Raphael Gontijo Lopes, Sara Fridovich-Keil, Rebecca Roelofs |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | To the Point: Efficient 3D Object Detection in the Range Image With Graph Convolution Kernelsabstract3D object detection is vital for many robotics applications. For tasks where a 2D perspective range image exists, we propose to learn a 3D representation directly from this range image view. To this end, we designed a 2D convolutional network architecture that carries the 3D spherical coordinates of each pixel throughout the network. Its layers can consume any arbitrary convolution kernel in place of the default inner product kernel and exploit the underlying local geometry around each pixel. We outline four such kernels: a dense kernel according to the bag-of-words paradigm, and three graph kernels inspired by recent graph neural network advances: the Transformer, the PointNet, and the Edge Convolution. We also explore cross-modality fusion with the camera image, facilitated by operating in the perspective range image view. Our method performs competitively on the Waymo Open Dataset and improves the state-of-the-art AP for pedestrian detection from 69.7% to 75.5%. It is also efficient in that our smallest model, which still outperforms the popular PointPillars in quality, requires 180 times fewer FLOPS and model parameters. Yuning Chai, Jiquan Ngiam, Weiyue Wang 0002, Benjamin Caine, Vijay Vasudevan, Dragomir Anguelov |
CVPR | 6 |
| 2021 | Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion DatasetabstractAs autonomous driving systems mature, motion forecasting has received increasing attention as a critical requirement for planning. Of particular importance are interactive situations such as merges, unprotected turns, etc., where predicting individual object motion is not sufficient. Joint predictions of multiple objects are required for effective route planning. There has been a critical need for high-quality motion data that is rich in both interactions and annotation to develop motion planning models. In this work, we introduce the most diverse interactive motion dataset to our knowledge, and provide specific labels for interacting objects suitable for developing joint prediction models. With over 100,000 scenes, each 20 seconds long at 10 Hz, our new dataset contains more than 570 hours of unique data over 1750 km of roadways. It was collected by mining for interesting interactions between vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists across six cities within the United States. We use a high-accuracy 3D auto-labeling system to generate high quality 3D bounding boxes for each road agent, and provide corresponding high definition 3D maps for each scene. Furthermore, we introduce a new set of metrics that provides a comprehensive evaluation of both single agent and joint agent interaction motion forecasting models. Finally, we provide strong baseline models for individual-agent prediction and joint-prediction. We hope that this new large-scale interactive motion dataset will provide new opportunities for advancing motion forecasting models. Scott Ettinger, Shuyang Cheng, Benjamin Caine, Chenxi Liu 0001, Hang Zhao 0021, Sabeek Pradhan, Yuning Chai, Benjamin Sapp, Charles R. Qi, Zoey Yang, Aurelien Chouard, Jiquan Ngiam, Vijay Vasudevan, Alexander McCauley, Jonathon Shlens, Dragomir Anguelov |
ICCV | 15 |
| 2020 | Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open DatasetabstractThe research community has increasing interest in autonomous driving research, despite the resource intensity of obtaining representative real world data. Existing self-driving datasets are limited in the scale and variation of the environments they capture, even though generalization within and between operating regions is crucial to the over-all viability of the technology. In an effort to help align the research community’s contributions with real-world self-driving problems, we introduce a new large scale, high quality, diverse dataset. Our new dataset consists of 1150 scenes that each span 20 seconds, consisting of well synchronized and calibrated high quality LiDAR and camera data captured across a range of urban and suburban geographies. It is 15x more diverse than the largest camera+LiDAR dataset available based on our proposed diversity metric. We exhaustively annotated this data with 2D (camera image) and 3D (LiDAR) bounding boxes, with consistent identifiers across frames. Finally, we provide strong baselines for 2D as well as 3D detection and tracking tasks. We further study the effects of dataset size and generalization across geographies on 3D detection methods. Find data, code and more up-to-date information at http://www.waymo.com/open. Henrik Kretzschmar, Xerxes Dotiwalla, Aurelien Chouard, Vijaysai Patnaik, Paul Tsui, James Guo, Yuning Chai, Benjamin Caine, Vijay Vasudevan, Wei Han 0002, Jiquan Ngiam, Hang Zhao 0021, Aleksei Timofeev, Scott Ettinger, Maxim Krivokon, Amy Gao, Yu Zhang 0033, Jonathon Shlens, Dragomir Anguelov |
CVPR | 11 |
| 2020 | Improving 3D Object Detection Through Progressive Population Based Augmentation
Shuyang Cheng, Zhaoqi Leng, Ekin Dogus Cubuk, Barret Zoph, Chunyan Bai, Jiquan Ngiam, Benjamin Caine, Vijay Vasudevan, Quoc V. Le, Jonathon Shlens, Dragomir Anguelov |
ECCV (21) | 9 |
| 2020 | Streaming Object Detection for 3-D Point Clouds
Wei Han 0002, Benjamin Caine, Brandon Yang, Christoph Sprunk, Ouais Alsharif, Jiquan Ngiam, Vijay Vasudevan, Jonathon Shlens |
ECCV (18) | 8 |
| 2019 | AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Strategies From DataabstractData augmentation is an effective technique for improving the accuracy of modern image classifiers. However, current data augmentation implementations are manually designed. In this paper, we describe a simple procedure called AutoAugment to automatically search for improved data augmentation policies. In our implementation, we have designed a search space where a policy consists of many sub-policies, one of which is randomly chosen for each image in each mini-batch. A sub-policy consists of two operations, each operation being an image processing function such as translation, rotation, or shearing, and the probabilities and magnitudes with which the functions are applied. We use a search algorithm to find the best policy such that the neural network yields the highest validation accuracy on a target dataset. Our method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, SVHN, and ImageNet (without additional data). On ImageNet, we attain a Top-1 accuracy of 83.5% which is 0.4% better than the previous record of 83.1%. On CIFAR-10, we achieve an error rate of 1.5%, which is 0.6% better than the previous state-of-the-art. Augmentation policies we find are transferable between datasets. The policy learned on ImageNet transfers well to achieve significant improvements on other datasets, such as Oxford Flowers, Caltech-101, Oxford-IIT Pets, FGVC Aircraft, and Stanford Cars. Ekin Dogus Cubuk, Barret Zoph, Dan Mané, Vijay Vasudevan, Quoc V. Le |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2019 | MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for MobileabstractDesigning convolutional neural networks (CNN) for mobile devices is challenging because mobile models need to be small and fast, yet still accurate. Although significant efforts have been dedicated to design and improve mobile CNNs on all dimensions, it is very difficult to manually balance these trade-offs when there are so many architectural possibilities to consider. In this paper, we propose an automated mobile neural architecture search (MNAS) approach, which explicitly incorporate model latency into the main objective so that the search can identify a model that achieves a good trade-off between accuracy and latency. Unlike previous work, where latency is considered via another, often inaccurate proxy (e.g., FLOPS), our approach directly measures real-world inference latency by executing the model on mobile phones. To further strike the right balance between flexibility and search space size, we propose a novel factorized hierarchical search space that encourages layer diversity throughout the network. Experimental results show that our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art mobile CNN models across multiple vision tasks. On the ImageNet classification task, our MnasNet achieves 75.2% top-1 accuracy with 78ms latency on a Pixel phone, which is 1.8× faster than MobileNetV2 with 0.5% higher accuracy and 2.3× faster than NASNet with 1.2% higher accuracy. Our MnasNet also achieves better mAP quality than MobileNets for COCO object detection. Code is at https://github.com/tensorflow/tpu/tree/master/models/official/mnasnet. Mingxing Tan, Bo Chen 0019, Ruoming Pang, Vijay Vasudevan, Mark Sandler 0002, Andrew G. Howard, Quoc V. Le |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2019 | Searching for MobileNetV3abstractWe present the next generation of MobileNets based on a combination of complementary search techniques as well as a novel architecture design. MobileNetV3 is tuned to mobile phone CPUs through a combination of hardware-aware network architecture search (NAS) complemented by the NetAdapt algorithm and then subsequently improved through novel architecture advances. This paper starts the exploration of how automated search algorithms and network design can work together to harness complementary approaches improving the overall state of the art. Through this process we create two new MobileNet models for release: MobileNetV3-Large and MobileNetV3-Small which are targeted for high and low resource use cases. These models are then adapted and applied to the tasks of object detection and semantic segmentation. For the task of semantic segmentation (or any dense pixel prediction), we propose a new efficient segmentation decoder Lite Reduced Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (LR-ASPP). We achieve new state of the art results for mobile classification, detection and segmentation. MobileNetV3-Large is 3.2% more accurate on ImageNet classification while reducing latency by 20% compared to MobileNetV2. MobileNetV3-Small is 6.6% more accurate compared to a MobileNetV2 model with comparable latency. MobileNetV3-Large detection is over 25% faster at roughly the same accuracy as MobileNetV2 on COCO detection. MobileNetV3-Large LRASPP is 34% faster than MobileNetV2 R-ASPP at similar accuracy for Cityscapes segmentation. Andrew G. Howard, Ruoming Pang, Hartwig Adam, Quoc V. Le, Mark Sandler 0002, Bo Chen 0019, Liang-Chieh Chen, Mingxing Tan, Grace Chu, Vijay Vasudevan, Yukun Zhu |
ICCV | 11 |
| 2018 | Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image RecognitionabstractDeveloping neural network image classification models often requires significant architecture engineering. In this paper, we study a method to learn the model architectures directly on the dataset of interest. As this approach is expensive when the dataset is large, we propose to search for an architectural building block on a small dataset and then transfer the block to a larger dataset. The key contribution of this work is the design of a new search space (which we call the "NASNet search space") which enables transferability. In our experiments, we search for the best convolutional layer (or "cell") on the CIFAR-10 dataset and then apply this cell to the ImageNet dataset by stacking together more copies of this cell, each with their own parameters to design a convolutional architecture, which we name a "NASNet architecture". We also introduce a new regularization technique called ScheduledDropPath that significantly improves generalization in the NASNet models. On CIFAR-10 itself, a NASNet found by our method achieves 2.4% error rate, which is state-of-the-art. Although the cell is not searched for directly on ImageNet, a NASNet constructed from the best cell achieves, among the published works, state-of-the-art accuracy of 82.7% top-1 and 96.2% top-5 on ImageNet. Our model is 1.2% better in top-1 accuracy than the best human-invented architectures while having 9 billion fewer FLOPS - a reduction of 28% in computational demand from the previous state-of-the-art model. When evaluated at different levels of computational cost, accuracies of NASNets exceed those of the state-of-the-art human-designed models. For instance, a small version of NASNet also achieves 74% top-1 accuracy, which is 3.1% better than equivalently-sized, state-of-the-art models for mobile platforms. Finally, the image features learned from image classification are generically useful and can be transferred to other computer vision problems. On the task of object detection, the learned features by NASNet used with the Faster-RCNN framework surpass state-of-the-art by 4.0% achieving 43.1% mAP on the COCO dataset. Barret Zoph, Vijay Vasudevan, Jonathon Shlens, Quoc V. Le |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2018 | Understanding and Simplifying One-Shot Architecture SearchabstractThere is growing interest in automating neural network architecture design. Existing architecture search methods can be computationally expensive, requiring thousands of different architectures to be trained from scratch. Recent work has explored weight sharing across models to amortize the cost of training. Although previous methods reduced the cost of architecture search by orders of magnitude, they remain complex, requiring hypernetworks or reinforcement learning controllers. We aim to understand weight sharing for one-shot architecture search. With careful experimental analysis, we show that it is possible to efficiently identify promising architectures from a complex search space without either hypernetworks or RL. Gabriel Bender, Pieter-Jan Kindermans, Barret Zoph, Vijay Vasudevan, Quoc V. Le |
ICML | 4 |
| 2017 | Neural Optimizer Search with Reinforcement LearningabstractWe present an approach to automate the process of discovering optimization methods, with a focus on deep learning architectures. We train a Recurrent Neural Network controller to generate a string in a specific domain language that describes a mathematical update equation based on a list of primitive functions, such as the gradient, running average of the gradient, etc. The controller is trained with Reinforcement Learning to maximize the performance of a model after a few epochs. On CIFAR-10, our method discovers several update rules that are better than many commonly used optimizers, such as Adam, RMSProp, or SGD with and without Momentum on a ConvNet model. These optimizers can also be transferred to perform well on different neural network architectures, including Google’s neural machine translation system. Irwan Bello, Barret Zoph, Vijay Vasudevan, Quoc V. Le |
ICML | 3 |
| 2017 | In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing UnitabstractMany architects believe that major improvements in cost-energy-performance must now come from domain-specific hardware. This paper evaluates a custom ASIC---called a Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) --- deployed in datacenters since 2015 that accelerates the inference phase of neural networks (NN). The heart of the TPU is a 65,536 8-bit MAC matrix multiply unit that offers a peak throughput of 92 TeraOps/second (TOPS) and a large (28 MiB) software-managed on-chip memory. The TPU's deterministic execution model is a better match to the 99th-percentile response-time requirement of our NN applications than are the time-varying optimizations of CPUs and GPUs that help average throughput more than guaranteed latency. The lack of such features helps explain why, despite having myriad MACs and a big memory, the TPU is relatively small and low power. We compare the TPU to a server-class Intel Haswell CPU and an Nvidia K80 GPU, which are contemporaries deployed in the same datacenters. Our workload, written in the high-level TensorFlow framework, uses production NN applications (MLPs, CNNs, and LSTMs) that represent 95% of our datacenters' NN inference demand. Despite low utilization for some applications, the TPU is on average about 15X -- 30X faster than its contemporary GPU or CPU, with TOPS/Watt about 30X -- 80X higher. Moreover, using the CPU's GDDR5 memory in the TPU would triple achieved TOPS and raise TOPS/Watt to nearly 70X the GPU and 200X the CPU. Norman P. Jouppi, Cliff Young, Nishant Patil, David A. Patterson 0001, Gaurav Agrawal, Raminder Bajwa, Sarah Bates, Suresh Bhatia, Nan Boden, Al Borchers, Rick Boyle, Pierre-luc Cantin, Clifford Chao, Chris Clark, Jeremy Coriell, Mike Daley, Matt Dau, Jeffrey Dean, Ben Gelb, Tara Vazir Ghaemmaghami, Rajendra Gottipati, William Gulland, Robert Hagmann, Richard Ho 0001, Doug Hogberg, John Hu, Robert Hundt, Dan Hurt, Julian Ibarz, Aaron Jaffey, Alek Jaworski, Alexander Kaplan, Harshit Khaitan, Daniel Killebrew, Andy Koch, Steve Lacy, James Laudon, James Law, Diemthu Le, Chris Leary, Zhuyuan Liu, Kyle Lucke, Alan Lundin, Gordon MacKean, Adriana Maggiore, Maire Mahony, Kieran Miller, Rahul Nagarajan, Ravi Narayanaswami, Ray Ni, Kathy Nix, Thomas Norrie, Mark Omernick, Narayana Penukonda, Andy Phelps, Jonathan Ross, Amir Salek, Emad Samadiani, Chris Severn, Gregory Sizikov, Matthew Snelham, Jed Souter, Dan Steinberg, Andy Swing, Mercedes Tan, Gregory Thorson, Horia Toma, Erick Tuttle, Vijay Vasudevan, Richard Walter, Walter Wang, Eric Wilcox, Doe Hyun Yoon |
ISCA | 72 |
| 2016 | TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale Machine Learning
Martín Abadi, Paul Barham 0001, Jianmin Chen, Andy Davis, Jeffrey Dean, Matthieu Devin, Sanjay Ghemawat, Geoffrey Irving, Michael Isard, Manjunath Kudlur, Josh Levenberg, Rajat Monga, Sherry Moore, Derek Gordon Murray, Benoit Steiner, Paul A. Tucker, Vijay Vasudevan, Pete Warden, Martin Wicke, Xiaoqiang Zheng |
OSDI | 18 |
| 2012 | Using vector interfaces to deliver millions of IOPS from a networked key-value storage serverabstractThe performance of non-volatile memories (NVM) has grown by a factor of 100 during the last several years: Flash devices today are capable of over 1 million I/Os per second. Unfortunately, this incredible growth has put strain on software storage systems looking to extract their full potential. Vijay Vasudevan, Michael Kaminsky, David G. Andersen |
SoCC | 1 |
| 2011 | The Case for VOS: The Vector Operating System
Vijay Vasudevan, David G. Andersen, Michael Kaminsky |
HotOS | 1 |
| 2009 | FAWNdamentally Power-efficient Clusters
Vijay Vasudevan, Jason Franklin, David G. Andersen, Amar Phanishayee, Lawrence Tan, Michael Kaminsky, Iulian Moraru |
HotOS | 1 |
| 2009 | A First Look at Media Conferencing Traffic in the Global Enterprise
Vijay Vasudevan, Sudipta Sengupta, Jin Li 0001 |
PAM | 1 |
| 2009 | Safe and effective fine-grained TCP retransmissions for datacenter communicationabstractThis paper presents a practical solution to a problem facing high-fan-in, high-bandwidth synchronized TCP workloads in datacenter Ethernets---the TCP incast problem. In these networks, receivers can experience a drastic reduction in application throughput when simultaneously requesting data from many servers using TCP. Inbound data overfills small switch buffers, leading to TCP timeouts lasting hundreds of milliseconds. For many datacenter workloads that have a barrier synchronization requirement (e.g., filesystem reads and parallel data-intensive queries), throughput is reduced by up to 90%. For latency-sensitive applications, TCP timeouts in the datacenter impose delays of hundreds of milliseconds in networks with round-trip-times in microseconds. Vijay Vasudevan, Amar Phanishayee, Hiral Shah, Elie Krevat, David G. Andersen, Gregory R. Ganger, Garth A. Gibson, Brian Mueller |
SIGCOMM | 1 |
| 2009 | FAWN: a fast array of wimpy nodesabstractThis paper presents a new cluster architecture for low-power data-intensive computing. FAWN couples low-power embedded CPUs to small amounts of local flash storage, and balances computation and I/O capabilities to enable efficient, massively parallel access to data.The key contributions of this paper are the principles of the FAWN architecture and the design and implementation of FAWN-KV--a consistent, replicated, highly available, and high-performance key-value storage system built on a FAWN prototype. Our design centers around purely log-structured datastores that provide the basis for high performance on flash storage, as well as for replication and consistency obtained using chain replication on a consistent hashing ring. Our evaluation demonstrates that FAWN clusters can handle roughly 350 key-value queries per Joule of energy--two orders of magnitude more than a disk-based system. David G. Andersen, Jason Franklin, Michael Kaminsky, Amar Phanishayee, Lawrence Tan, Vijay Vasudevan |
SOSP | 6 |
| 2008 | Measurement and Analysis of TCP Throughput Collapse in Cluster-based Storage Systems
Amar Phanishayee, Elie Krevat, Vijay Vasudevan, David G. Andersen, Gregory R. Ganger, Garth A. Gibson, Srinivasan Seshan |
FAST | 3 |